Rising income inequality has set off fierce political and economic debates, but one important angle hasn’t been explored adequately. We need to ask whether market forces themselves might limit or reverse the trend.
Technology has contributed to the rise in inequality, but there are also some significant ways in which technology could reduce it.
For example, while computers have improved our lives in many ways, they haven’t yet done much to make health care and education cheaper. Over the next few decades, however, that may well change: We can easily imagine medical diagnosis by online artificial intelligence, greater use of online competitive procurement for health care services, more transparency in pricing and thus more competition, and much cheaper online education for many students, to cite just a few possibilities. In such a world, many wage gains would come from new and cheaper services, rather than from being able to cut a better deal with the boss at work.
It is a bit harder to see how information technology can lower housing costs, but perhaps the sharing economy can make it easier to live in much smaller spaces and rent needed items, rather than store them in a house or apartment. That would enable lower-income people to live closer to higher-paying urban jobs and at lower cost.
Another set of future gains, especially for lesser-skilled workers, may come as computers become easier to handle for people with rudimentary skill. Not everyone can work fruitfully with computers now. There is a generation gap when it comes to manipulating electronic devices, and many relevant tasks require knowledge of programming or, more ambitiously, the entrepreneurial skill of creating a start-up. That, in a nutshell, is how our dynamic sector has concentrated its gains among a relatively small number of employees, thus leading to more income inequality.
This particular type of inequality may very well change. As the previous generation retires from the work force, many more people will have grown up with intimate knowledge of computers. And over time, it may become easier to work with computers just by talking to them. As computer-human interfaces become simpler and easier to manage, that may raise the relative return to less-skilled labor.
The future may also extend a growing category of employment, namely workers who team up with smart robots that require human assistance. Perhaps a smart robot will perform some of the current functions of a factory worker, while the human companion will do what the robot cannot, such as deal with a system breakdown or call a supervisor. Such jobs would require versatility and flexible reasoning, a bit like some of the old manufacturing jobs, but not necessarily a lot of high-powered technical training, again because of the greater ease of the human-computer interface. That too could raise the returns to many relatively unskilled workers.
The Latest on: Income inequality
via Google News
The Latest on: Income inequality
- Thomas Piketty says pandemic is opportunity to address income inequalityon November 27, 2020 at 7:30 am
Economist Thomas Piketty told Hill.TV that the financial crisis prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic could provide an opportunity for U.S. leaders to address income inequality."I think that today after ...
- Inequality in Austria is higher than expected, new research revealson November 26, 2020 at 2:16 pm
The 10 percent of the Austrian population with the highest income earn more than three times the Austrian average and seven times more than the lowest-income half of the population, finds new research ...
- ‘Income inequality’ is a socioeconomic red herringon November 25, 2020 at 3:52 pm
It is perhaps a discouraging sign of the times that even an objectively neutral analyst such as Moody’s Investors Service — whose stock-in-trade is, after all, making formulaic assessments of various ...
- Moody’s: Pandemic shock to spur income inequalityon November 24, 2020 at 8:31 am
The shock from the coronavirus pandemic may spur income inequality with credit risks for fiscally weak countries like the Philippines, according to Moody’s Investors Service.
- Warren Buffett wants more small-business aid, less income inequality, and a robust economic recovery. He'll be happy to have Janet Yellen as treasury secretaryon November 24, 2020 at 5:21 am
Warren Buffett is likely pleased that President-elect Joe Biden intends to appoint Janet Yellen as treasury secretary. The billionaire investor and Berkshire Hathaway CEO praised the former Federal ...
- Covid-19 could worsen income inequality for fiscally weak countries in South-east Asiaon November 24, 2020 at 4:57 am
GOVERNMENTS with weak social systems and limited scope to raise fiscal spending amid the Covid-19 pandemic could face challenges in tackling income inequality, with Indonesia, Malaysia and the ...
- Monopoly Was Designed to Teach the 99% About Income Inequalityon November 24, 2020 at 3:35 am
Magie, by then married to a Virginia businessman (but still apparently a committed anti-monopolist), sold her patent to Parker Brothers for $500 the same year, initially thrilled that her tool for ...
- Regional income inequality seen worsening in countries spending less on welfareon November 24, 2020 at 3:13 am
INCOME INEQUALITY is expected to worsen in Asia Pacific economies that skimped on social safety nets and welfare spending during the pandemic, according to Moody’s Investors Service. “Governments with ...
- “Human Work” Is the Key to Ending Income Inequalityon November 23, 2020 at 11:32 am
Even before the pandemic, growing income inequality had become a stubborn feature of global economies. That doesn’t mean we should accept it.
- More income inequality means fewer items in grocery storeson November 20, 2020 at 9:27 am
"The conventional wisdom is that greater inequality means that we have greater diversity of desires, and that this should increase the number of product offerings in the store. Finding the opposite ...
via Bing News