Rising income inequality has set off fierce political and economic debates, but one important angle hasn’t been explored adequately. We need to ask whether market forces themselves might limit or reverse the trend.
Technology has contributed to the rise in inequality, but there are also some significant ways in which technology could reduce it.
For example, while computers have improved our lives in many ways, they haven’t yet done much to make health care and education cheaper. Over the next few decades, however, that may well change: We can easily imagine medical diagnosis by online artificial intelligence, greater use of online competitive procurement for health care services, more transparency in pricing and thus more competition, and much cheaper online education for many students, to cite just a few possibilities. In such a world, many wage gains would come from new and cheaper services, rather than from being able to cut a better deal with the boss at work.
It is a bit harder to see how information technology can lower housing costs, but perhaps the sharing economy can make it easier to live in much smaller spaces and rent needed items, rather than store them in a house or apartment. That would enable lower-income people to live closer to higher-paying urban jobs and at lower cost.
Another set of future gains, especially for lesser-skilled workers, may come as computers become easier to handle for people with rudimentary skill. Not everyone can work fruitfully with computers now. There is a generation gap when it comes to manipulating electronic devices, and many relevant tasks require knowledge of programming or, more ambitiously, the entrepreneurial skill of creating a start-up. That, in a nutshell, is how our dynamic sector has concentrated its gains among a relatively small number of employees, thus leading to more income inequality.
This particular type of inequality may very well change. As the previous generation retires from the work force, many more people will have grown up with intimate knowledge of computers. And over time, it may become easier to work with computers just by talking to them. As computer-human interfaces become simpler and easier to manage, that may raise the relative return to less-skilled labor.
The future may also extend a growing category of employment, namely workers who team up with smart robots that require human assistance. Perhaps a smart robot will perform some of the current functions of a factory worker, while the human companion will do what the robot cannot, such as deal with a system breakdown or call a supervisor. Such jobs would require versatility and flexible reasoning, a bit like some of the old manufacturing jobs, but not necessarily a lot of high-powered technical training, again because of the greater ease of the human-computer interface. That too could raise the returns to many relatively unskilled workers.
The Latest on: Income inequality
via Google News
The Latest on: Income inequality
- For small business, hindsight is 2020: Income inequality hits homeon May 12, 2020 at 8:00 am
Small business leaders in the United States are worried about income inequality, regardless of their politics.
- How to Use the Power of Urban Planning to Tackle Inequalityon May 8, 2020 at 10:44 pm
Income inequality creates both spatial and social divides and shows itself within cities in many ways. Gated communities in Indonesia have become a glaring example. However, legislation and urban ...
- Challenge Of A Generation: Inequality Makes For A Difficult Futureon May 7, 2020 at 9:43 am
The wealth gap is increasing in America, a historical look. It's no surprise that there's mass protesting over the government lockdown. Trust is failing. This c ...
- Study finds stronger links between automation and inequalityon May 6, 2020 at 10:05 am
A new study co-authored by an MIT economist suggests automation has a bigger impact on the labor market and income inequality than previous research would indicate -- and identifies the year 1987 as a ...
- Coronavirus pandemic has harmed lower-income workers the moston May 6, 2020 at 6:21 am
The coronavirus is deepening divides in the United States along income, race and gender lines—with lower-income women suffering the greatest losses.
- Bill Murray asked Warren Buffett a question, and the billionaire gave a powerful answer on income inequalityon May 5, 2020 at 3:38 am
We should 'try to create a society that under normal conditions with more than $60,000 of GDP per capita, that anybody that worked 40 hours a week can have a decent life without a second job,' says ...
- Warren Buffett, Challenged by Bill Murray, Speaks Out on Income Inequalityon May 4, 2020 at 8:42 am
At Berkshire Hathaway’s 2020 shareholders meeting on Saturday, which was streamed by Yahoo Finance, the 89-year-old billionaire investor was challenged by a question from the actor Bill Murray, ...
- China Has Completely Failed To Defeat Income Inequalityon May 2, 2020 at 4:38 pm
The descendants of the pre-revolution economic elite are significantly better off today than the descendants of the pre-revolution poor.
- Review: Income inequality? 'Capital in the Twenty-First Century' says the system needs fixingon April 30, 2020 at 12:32 pm
Filmmaker Justin Pemberton turns French economist Thomas Piketty's 2013 manifesto on inequality, "Capital in the Twenty-First Century," into an engaging documentary.
- Progressives’ analysis of income inequality is pretty lopsided | Opinionon April 29, 2020 at 3:45 pm
Inequality — that’s the foremost issue for so-called progressives these days, and here is what it means in their compassionate souls: not inequality under the law, which would be abhorrent in a just ...
via Bing News