The deliberate, large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system is not a “quick fix” for global warming, according to the findings of the UK’s first publicly funded studies on geoengineering.
The results of three projects – IAGP, led by the University of Leeds; SPICE, led by the University of Bristol; and CGG, led by the University of Oxford – are announced at an event held at The Royal Society, London, on 26 November 2014.
Professor Piers Forster, Professor of Physical Climate Change at the University of Leeds, and the principal investigator of the Integrated Assessment of Geoengineering Proposals (IAGP) project, said: “Our research shows that the devil is in the detail. Geoengineering will be much more expensive and challenging than previous estimates suggest and any benefits would be limited.
“For example, when simulating the spraying of sea salt particles into clouds to try to brighten them, we found that only a few clouds were susceptible and that the particles would tend to coagulate and fall out before reaching the cloud base.”
In September 2009, The Royal Society published a report, Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty. It influenced research worldwide, identified important gaps and called for a major UK funding programme into geoengineering. The IAGP and SPICE projects were funded the next year, and the CGG project followed in 2012.
IAGP is the UK’s first interdisciplinary research study into the controversial issue of geoengineering. It has brought together a range of expertise – climate modelling, philosophy and engineering – in addition to understanding public perceptions, to assess geoengineering within wider societal values.
“Cleverly designed simulations create less necessity for real-world testing.. My favourite part of the research involved creating a virtual reality in which we tried to rescue Arctic sea ice by dumping sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere from Stratotanker aircraft flying out of Svalbard in Norway,” said Professor Forster.
“Issues around monitoring and predicting the effects of our actions led to huge indecision and highlighted how challenging it would be to ever try and deploy these techniques in the real world.”
Researchers working on the Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (SPICE) project took a different tack, but came to a similar cautionary conclusion.
Rather than running simulations, SPICE researchers used volcanoes as models to mimic the effect of a solar geoengineering proposal, in which sulphate aerosols are pumped into the atmosphere to reflect more sunlight back into space. This is a process that also naturally occurs due to particles emitted from volcanic eruptions.
Dr Matthew Watson, a reader in natural hazards from the University of Bristol, and principal investigator for the SPICE project, said: “Whilst it is clear that temperatures could be reduced during deployment, the potential for misstep is considerable. By identifying risks, we hope to contribute to the evidence base around geoengineering that will determine whether deployment, in the face of the threat of climate change, has the capacity to do more good than harm.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Terra Verde – The Need for Anti-Racist Climate Leadership and the Politics of Solar Geoengineeringon June 26, 2020 at 3:01 pm
A discussion with Dr Jennie Stephens of Northeastern University of the injustices of climate geoengineering and the imperative of anti-racist, feminist leadership for climate and energy policy.
- New UCS White Paper Says Strong Public Input Needed on Solar Geoengineering Research, Experimentson June 25, 2020 at 9:22 am
The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) released a new white paper on the need to establish governance structures and ensure meaningful public participation in solar geoengineering research before ...
- Uncle Sky Stripes City On National Holiday; Should We Worry, Or Say Thanks? - And Response (5)on June 20, 2020 at 5:00 pm
The fix is on and operates entirely outside a laggardly scientific literature about stratospheric aerosol geoengineering. Academia assumes absolutely nothing has been done to armor up the higher ...
- The game theory of using geoengineering to fight climate changeon June 20, 2020 at 9:27 am
The possibility of employing geoengineering could help break the political deadlock on a global climate change deal, according to a new paper. Why it matters: Deliberately trying to engineer the ...
- Solar geoengineering could cause unwanted changes in climate, new modelling suggestson June 20, 2020 at 7:49 am
Solar geoengineering involves cooling the Earth by reflecting incoming sunlight and is seen by some scientists as a way of mitigating the effects of global warming. One popular strategy involves ...
- Climate Crisis: Keystone XL Supreme, Cap and Trade Takes Hit and California Geoengineeringon June 19, 2020 at 11:01 am
As recently reported by The Real News, the state’s climate leadership is toying with the idea of geoengineering in recent months by considering a technique called Direct Air Capture ...
- Availability of risky geoengineering can make an ambitious climate mitigation agreement more likelyon June 17, 2020 at 2:23 am
Table 1 Climate policy resulting from each pair of moves. High mitigation agreement (H) is only possible if both players choose H over low (L) mitigation. If all players agreed on either of the three ...
- Dimming the Skyon June 16, 2020 at 5:00 pm
But the method, called solar geoengineering, comes with some serious risks. Given the grim reality of the climate crisis, some scientists are seeking to artificially manipulate the environment to ...
- Ocean geoengineering tests violate UN convention: green groupson June 8, 2020 at 8:35 am
Experimental geoengineering schemes to protect areas such as Australia's Great Barrier Reef are "distracting technofixes" that violate an international moratorium on the largely untested tech projects ...
- Dyer: Geoengineering will buy us time to end greenhouse gas emissionson June 7, 2020 at 5:00 pm
What we will desperately need at that point is more time. That’s why we will need geoengineering. Geoengineering is not a cure; it is a way of temporarily counteracting the warming caused by our ...
via Bing News