In a digital world where many adults remember a time before personal computers and the internet existed, its not surprising that ethics policies and practices are still catching up to the technology, acknowledge an international team of research ethics scholars in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Using the recent debate over the Facebook-Cornell “emotional contagion” study as a starting point, they begin mapping the ethics terrain of large-scale social computing research.
“The emotive reaction to the Facebook experiment is proof of the public interest in this set of issues as well as an indication that best practices have yet to be identified,” the commentary states.
The authors address questions such as: What counts as research involving human participants? When is consent required and what approach is appropriate for use of information freely shared on social media? How should privately funded companies conducting internal research be regulated, since they fall outside of federal rules?
“The Internet as a virtual public space where people interact, and concerns about the privacy of those interactions, are concepts that were unimaginable in the late 1970s when foundational ethics frameworks for the protection of human research subjects were developed,” says Jeffrey Kahn, lead author of the commentary and the Levi Professor of Bioethics and Public Policy at the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics.
The commentary argues that the application of an appropriate ethics framework and some form of ethics oversight to large-scale social computing research is “a moral imperative” and that it is “in everyone’s interest not to attempt forcing a 20th century regulatory regime onto 21st century technologies and approaches to research and innovation.”
The commentary examines areas where current regulations fall short and offers take-away lessons for the development of a new research ethics paradigm for social computing research:
The Latest on: Bioethics
via Google News
The Latest on: Bioethics
- How 1 Family Persuaded U.S. Bioethics Body to List Japanese War Crimeson January 15, 2020 at 7:30 pm
Appalling medical experiments carried out by the Japanese on Korean and Chinese victims in World War II finally feature prominently in a mandatory U.S. bioethics text read by 300,000 scientists around ...
- High-priced specialty drugs: Exposing the flaws in the systemon January 13, 2020 at 4:09 pm
My husband, Andy, has Parkinson’s disease. A year ago, his neurologist recommended a new pill that he was to take at bedtime. We quickly learned that the medication would cost US$1,300 for a one-month ...
- Jonathan Moreno On Bioethics And The Transformation Of Health Care In Americaon January 13, 2020 at 9:13 am
Jonathan D. Moreno is a Penn Integrates Knowledge University Professor at the university. They both served on President Obama’s bioethics commission. Together they've written the book "Everybody Wants ...
- The foxes and the henhouseon January 10, 2020 at 5:36 am
this is precisely the difficulty in biomedicine today: namely, that there are few, if any, "bottom lines" when it comes to research ethics. Probably the biggest bioethics story of 2019 involved Dr.
- Bioethics expert calls for research into genetically modified babieson January 6, 2020 at 6:23 am
In the paper, published in medical ethics journal Bioethics, Dr. Smith argued that an ethically sound attempt could be less than two years away, and predicted such research could kick-start a ...
- Master's in Bioethics Onlineon September 30, 2019 at 5:00 pm
Bioethics professionals are at the forefront of public discussions about what constitutes ethical behavior in medical and scientific research. The following provides information about the type of ...
- Pence’s bioethics career explores ‘people making choices and learning from their mistakes’on August 29, 2019 at 6:09 am
In addition, Pence coached the UAB Ethics Bowl Team, which won the national championship in 2010, and continues to coach the UAB Bioethics Bowl Team, which won national championships in 2011, 2016 and ...
- Bioethics International's Good Pharma Scorecard Improved the Data-Sharing Practices of Large Pharmaceutical Companieson July 11, 2019 at 11:22 am
Novo Nordisk and Roche tied for the top rankings in overall transparency and data-sharing NEW HAVEN, Conn., July 10, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Bioethics International (BEI), a not-for-profit organization ...
- Bioethics International's Good Pharma Scorecard Improved the Data-Sharing Practices of Large Pharmaceutical Companieson July 10, 2019 at 8:16 am
NEW HAVEN, Conn., July 10, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Bioethics International (BEI), a not-for-profit organization dedicated to raising the bar on ethics, trustworthiness and patient-centricity in the ...
- New head of bioethics center says new technology raises moral questionson June 30, 2019 at 11:13 pm
When Church leaders in the United States face new bioethical questions – such as surrounding abortion, euthanasia, or gender identity – they often turn to the Philadelphia-based National Catholic ...
via Bing News