Non-experts have high rates of success of lie detection when viewing experts work
Determining deception is a tool of the trade for law enforcement. The Good Cop/Bad Cop routine is etched in our minds as an effective method of finding out the truth. But prior research has shown that lie detecting is a 50/50 shot for experts and non-experts alike. So what exactly can we do to find out the truth? A recent study published in Human Communication Research by researchers at Korea University, Michigan State University, and Texas State University – San Marcos found that using active questioning of individuals yielded near-perfect results, 97.8%, in detecting deception.
Timothy Levine, Hee Sun Park (University of Korea), David Daniel Clare, Steve McCornack, Kelly Morrison (Michigan State University), and J.Pete Blair (Texas State – San Marcos) published their findings in the journal Human Communication Research. The researchers conducted three studies based on sets of participants who were asked to play a trivia game. Unbeknownst to the participants, a confederate was placed with them offering an incentive and opportunity to cheat at the game, since cash prizes were involved. In the first experiment 12% of the subjects cheated; in the second experiment 44.9% cheated.
An expert using the Reid Technique interrogated participants in the first study, this expert was 100% accurate (33 of 33) in determining who had cheated and who had not. That kind of accuracy has 100 million to one odds. The second group of participants were then interviewed by five US federal agents with substantial polygraph and interrogation expertise. Using a more flexible and free approach (interviews lasted from three minutes to 17 minutes), these experts were able to accurately detect whether or not a participant cheated in 87 of 89 interviews (97.8%). In the third study, non-experts were shown taped interrogations of the experts from the previous two experiments. These non-experts were able to determine deception at a greater-than-chance rate – 79.1% (experiment 1), and 93.6% (experiment 2).
Previous studies with “experts” usually used passive deception detection where they watched videotapes. In the few studies where experts were allowed to question potential liars, either they had to follow questions scripted by researchers (this study had no scripts) or confession seeking was precluded. Previous studies found that accuracy was near chance – just above 50%.
“This research suggests that effective questioning is critical to deception detection,” Levine said. “Asking bad questions can actually make people worse than chance at lie detection, and you can make honest people appear guilty. But, fairly minor changes in the questions can really improve accuracy, even in brief interviews. This has huge implications for intelligence and law enforcement.”
The Latest on: Lie detection
via Google News
The Latest on: Lie detection
- Duque’s lie detector test: is Colombia’s government implementing peace deal? on June 18, 2019 at 5:15 am
Colombia Reports relies on your financial support. Please become our patron and support independent reporting from Colombia. Colombia’s President Duque insisted Monday that “evidence and results” show ... […]
- Telling Truth From Lies: Experts Explain How To Detect Deceit on June 17, 2019 at 9:17 am
Oxygen, the destination for high-quality crime programming, uncovers the extreme lengths individuals will go to keep their lies hidden when “A Lie to Die For” premieres on Sunday, June 23 at 8pm ET/PT ... […]
- Baby P’s mum Tracey Connelly offers to take lie detector test in bid to be freed from jail on June 15, 2019 at 4:47 am
THE evil mum of tortured Baby P has offered to take a lie detector test in a desperate bid to be freed from jail. Tracey Connelly, who was jailed over the death of little Peter Connelly, made the ... […]
- Lie Detector Test: Have thieves 'stolen' bridge in Russia? on June 12, 2019 at 11:04 am
Social media has emerged as a great influencer. Few people misuse it and spread rumours. They post fake pictures and videos on Facebook, Twitter and other platforms. Unfortunately, these posts go ... […]
- Love & Hip Hop ATL Episode 13 Recap: Karlie Redd & Pooh Take A Lie Detector Test on June 11, 2019 at 9:48 am
In this week's episode, secrets are uncovered and lie detector tests are brought out. In this week's Love & Hip Hop: Atlanta episode, the jig is up for Kirk's secret phone line and Rasheeda is furious ... […]
- Meet Freya: the UK's first newt detection dog on June 10, 2019 at 8:13 am
Freya has been trained specifically to detect the newts, and her trainers say her dedication to finding the animals make her a perfect employee. She works really well. She does a really nice ... […]
- The Charlotte Show 301 | Charlotte And Josh's Reli Is On The Line After They Take A Lie Detector Test on June 10, 2019 at 2:04 am
Charlotte Crosby Opens Up About A "Really Bad Time" In Her And Josh Ritchie's Relationship ... […]
- Paedophiles should be forced to take lie detector test before being released from prison, ex-police chief says on June 8, 2019 at 1:02 am
PAEDOPHILES should be forced to take a lie detector test before being released from jail, an ex-police chief has said. Jim Gamble QPM, the former head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection ... […]
- Paedophiles should have to pass a lie detector test to prove they are safe to leave prison, former police chief says on June 7, 2019 at 9:31 pm
A former child protection police chief has said paedophiles should have to pass a lie detector test before being released from prison. Jim Gamble QPM, former head of Child Exploitation and Online ... […]
- Paedophiles should face lie detector tests before being released from jail, former police chief says on June 7, 2019 at 2:30 pm
Paedophiles should have to pass a lie detector test before being released from prison, a former child protection police chief has said. Jim Gamble QPM, the former head of the Child Exploitation and ... […]
via Bing News