Intellectual property: After being blamed for stymying innovation in America, vague and overly broad patents on software and business processes could get the chop
AT LAST, it seems, something is to be done about the dysfunctional way America’s patent system operates. Two recent developments suggest calls for patent reform are finally being heard at the highest levels. First, in 2013, defying expectations, the House of Representatives passed (by an overwhelming majority) the Innovation Act, a bill aimed squarely at neutralising so-called patent trolls. These are individuals or companies who buy up lots of patents and then use them to extract payments from unsuspecting victims. Second, the US Supreme Court agreed to rule on what is the most contentious issue of all: which inventions are actually eligible for patent protection.
Frivolous lawsuits filed by trolls cost American companies $29 billion in 2011 alone. Trolls (known in the legal world as “patent assertion entities” or “non-practising entities”) do not make anything, but send out thousands of “demand letters” to companies that allegedly infringe what are often vague and overly broad business-process and software patents. In recent years their targets have spread from high-tech firms to universities, retailers, hospitals, charities and even consumers. The trolls demand a settlement fee, which many of the victims pay rather than face the punitive cost of litigation—$2m or more these days.
Concern that the flood of frivolous patent suits in America is hobbling innovation and competition has caught Congress’s attention. Startups threatened by such actions frequently have to withdraw from the business or go bust. Bigger companies that choose to fight spend tens of millions of dollars on litigation that could otherwise go on research and development.
In a sense, the legal bullying by trolls is a symptom of a wider complaint: the poor quality of many patents granted by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in the past decade—especially those covering computer software and business transactions (themselves often based on software algorithms). One such patent covers simply upgrading computer software over the internet. That is admittedly useful, but hardly novel or non-obvious—the three fundamental requirements for eligibility adopted by patent jurisdictions everywhere.
Numerous corporations have started using their portfolios of poorly defined software patents to prevent rivals from entering the market. Witness the series of lengthy legal disputes between Apple and Samsung. Too often, it seems, software patents operate not as an incentive for innovation, but as a barrier to entry and a tax on new-product development. This is not what patent law was intended to do. Although the USPTO has been mainly at fault, America’s courts have not helped.
One of the worst offenders has been the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the appellate court that rules on patent disputes, among countless other things. Unlike its specialised counterparts in Europe and Japan, the Federal Circuit, with its grab-bag remit, has never acquired expertise in patent jurisprudence. As a consequence, it has issued some bizarre software rulings.
The Latest on: Patent trolls
via Google News
The Latest on: Patent trolls
- Open Invention Network comes to GNOME's aid in patent troll fighton October 28, 2019 at 9:07 am
It's just another day at the office for Rothschild, a Non-Practicing Entity (aka a patent troll), which has filed 714 lawsuits over the past six years. But for the non-profit GNOME Foundation, this ...
- The Debian Project stands with the GNOME Foundation in defense against patent trollson October 24, 2019 at 2:00 pm
Please read this blog post about GNOME's defense against this patent troll and consider making a donation to the GNOME Patent Troll Defense Fund.
- How Much Does a Patent Cost?on October 24, 2019 at 8:32 am
rent-seeking patent trolls. There is much about this system that Congress needs to update. It's a heck of a lot better than the alternative though. A patent is a monopoly over some idea or invention.
- A Response to Claims of Patent Propaganda and a Plea for Interpretive Charity in IP Debateon October 24, 2019 at 4:22 am
Malone’s objection to my characterization of the Wright Brothers as patent trolls is unresponsive. Her claim would give the impression that I deny that the Wright Brothers were essential to innovation ...
- How Those Memes You Just Posted Could Soon Cost You $30,000on October 23, 2019 at 11:05 am
Tribunals already exist; the Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent ... legal fees and up to $150,000 in damages. “The copyright troll’s job is really simple,” Ernesto Falcon, the Electronic ...
- 'Troll' Can't Keep Enforcing Abstract Patent, Nonprofit Sayson October 22, 2019 at 1:32 pm
Law360 (October 22, 2019, 4:20 PM EDT) -- After rebuffing a five-figure settlement offer from a "patent troll," a free-software nonprofit is asking a California federal court to invalidate the imaging ...
- Taking the STRONGER Patents Act critics seriouslyon October 22, 2019 at 10:01 am
Finally, the bill would inhibit “rogue and opaque” patent demand letters sent by so-called patent “trolls” looking to shake down would-be victims. At the Judiciary hearing, hosted by the Intellectual ...
- Another Memoji Patent was granted to Apple today that Originated with their Faceshift Teamon October 22, 2019 at 8:36 am
It's great that Apple's Memoji has another patent to protect it from patent trolls. Other patent reports covering Memoji patents that originated with Faceshift include these: 01 and 02. Google came ...
- GNOME Foundation steps up its open source patent defenseon October 22, 2019 at 7:35 am
As the GNOME Foundation went on to say in a statement: A month ago, GNOME was hit by a patent troll for developing the Shotwell image management application. It's the first time a free software ...
- GNOME sends message to 'patent trolls' and files defence against lawsuiton October 21, 2019 at 8:54 pm
The GNOME Foundation has filed a defence against the patent lawsuit it received a month ago, saying it wants to "send a message to all software patent trolls out there". The alleged "patent troll" in ...
via Bing News