New power plant design could provide enhanced safety, easier siting, and centralized construction.
When an earthquake and tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant complex in 2011, neither the quake nor the inundation caused the ensuing contamination. Rather, it was the aftereffects — specifically, the lack of cooling for the reactor cores, due to a shutdown of all power at the station — that caused most of the harm.
A new design for nuclear plants built on floating platforms, modeled after those used for offshore oil drilling, could help avoid such consequences in the future. Such floating plants would be designed to be automatically cooled by the surrounding seawater in a worst-case scenario, which would indefinitely prevent any melting of fuel rods, or escape of radioactive material.
The concept is being presented this week at the Small Modular Reactors Symposium, hosted by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, by MIT professors Jacopo Buongiorno, Michael Golay, and Neil Todreas, along with others from MIT, the University of Wisconsin, and Chicago Bridge and Iron, a major nuclear plant and offshore platform construction company.
Such plants, Buongiorno explains, could be built in a shipyard, then towed to their destinations five to seven miles offshore, where they would be moored to the seafloor and connected to land by an underwater electric transmission line. The concept takes advantage of two mature technologies: light-water nuclear reactors and offshore oil and gas drilling platforms. Using established designs minimizes technological risks, says Buongiorno, an associate professor of nuclear science and engineering (NSE) at MIT.
Although the concept of a floating nuclear plant is not unique — Russia is in the process of building one now, on a barge moored at the shore — none have been located far enough offshore to be able to ride out a tsunami, Buongiorno says. For this new design, he says, “the biggest selling point is the enhanced safety.”
A floating platform several miles offshore, moored in about 100 meters of water, would be unaffected by the motions of a tsunami; earthquakes would have no direct effect at all. Meanwhile, the biggest issue that faces most nuclear plants under emergency conditions — overheating and potential meltdown, as happened at Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island — would be virtually impossible at sea, Buongiorno says: “It’s very close to the ocean, which is essentially an infinite heat sink, so it’s possible to do cooling passively, with no intervention. The reactor containment itself is essentially underwater.”
Buongiorno lists several other advantages. For one thing, it is increasingly difficult and expensive to find suitable sites for new nuclear plants: They usually need to be next to an ocean, lake, or river to provide cooling water, but shorefront properties are highly desirable. By contrast, sites offshore, but out of sight of land, could be located adjacent to the population centers they would serve. “The ocean is inexpensive real estate,” Buongiorno says.
In addition, at the end of a plant’s lifetime, “decommissioning” could be accomplished by simply towing it away to a central facility, as is done now for the Navy’s carrier and submarine reactors. That would rapidly restore the site to pristine conditions.
This design could also help to address practical construction issues that have tended to make new nuclear plants uneconomical: Shipyard construction allows for better standardization, and the all-steel design eliminates the use of concrete, which Buongiorno says is often responsible for construction delays and cost overruns.
There are no particular limits to the size of such plants, he says: They could be anywhere from small, 50-megawatt plants to 1,000-megawatt plants matching today’s largest facilities. “It’s a flexible concept,” Buongiorno says.
Most operations would be similar to those of onshore plants, and the plant would be designed to meet all regulatory security requirements for terrestrial plants. “Project work has confirmed the feasibility of achieving this goal, including satisfaction of the extra concern of protection against underwater attack,” says Todreas, the KEPCO Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Mechanical Engineering.
Buongiorno sees a market for such plants in Asia, which has a combination of high tsunami risks and a rapidly growing need for new power sources. “It would make a lot of sense for Japan,” he says, as well as places such as Indonesia, Chile, and Africa.
This is a “very attractive and promising proposal,” says Toru Obara, a professor at the Research Laboratory for Nuclear Reactors at the Tokyo Institute of Technology who was not involved in this research. “I think this is technically very feasible. … Of course, further study is needed to realize the concept, but the authors have the answers to each question and the answers are realistic.”
The Latest on: Nuclear plants
via Google News
The Latest on: Nuclear plants
- Contractors for nuclear fuel plant at Savannah River Site accused of misusing federal fundson January 17, 2020 at 1:08 pm
Those contractors were responsible for building a one-of-a-kind nuclear facility intended to turn weapons-grade plutonium into fuel for nuclear power plants. The massive project and nuclear program ...
- Could UAE nuclear reactors imperil the Gulf?on January 17, 2020 at 11:59 am
Those risks become even more ominous when a nuclear power plant is introduced into a tinderbox of geopolitical rivalries like the Arabian Peninsula. But that's where the region is headed. This week, ...
- Lithuania Fears A Russian-Built Nuclear Power Plant Next Door In Belaruson January 16, 2020 at 6:51 pm
Belarus built the plant to reduce its energy dependence on Russia The nuclear plant is being built by Russia’s state-owned nuclear company The International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, will journey ...
- How Safe Are The UAE’s Nuclear Power Plants?on January 16, 2020 at 10:26 am
Nuclear power is controversial in many parts of the world, but perhaps nowhere more than in the Gulf region, where it has been at the heart of the geopolitical storm involving Iran ...
- 5 Thrilling Tales of Deadly Nuclear Reactorson January 16, 2020 at 8:00 am
Heinlein’s Future History. Rising demand for energy justifies the construction of a cutting-edge nuclear reactor. There is little leeway between normal operation and atomic explodageddon, which puts a ...
- PG&E nuclear plant closure would cause electric bills to riseon January 13, 2020 at 2:50 pm
The closure of California’s last nuclear power plant would cost Pacific Gas and Electric Co. customers $112.5 million annually under a regulatory settlement the utility recently reached with various ...
- Canada Sends Nuclear Power Plant Warning to Millions — Before Admitting It Was an 'Error'on January 13, 2020 at 1:33 pm
Talk about a false alarm. Residents in Canada’s Ontario province woke up Sunday morning to a startling message that warned of an unspecified “incident” occurring at a nearby nuclear power plant.
- Lithuania Fears New Belarusian Nuclear Plant Hasn't 'Learned Lessons Of Chernobyl'on January 13, 2020 at 3:37 am
ASTRAVETS, Belarus -- Mikalay Ulasevich was running in municipal elections in July 2016 when a local resident alerted him to a major accident at a nuclear power plant under construction close to this ...
- Nuclear plant alert startles Canadianson January 12, 2020 at 11:16 pm
TORONTO -- People throughout the Canadian province of Ontario awoke Sunday to a cellphone alert of an "incident" at a nuclear plant just east of Toronto -- only to later be told the message was a ...
- 'Emergency alert' about nuclear plant in Ontario sent in erroron January 12, 2020 at 6:36 pm
Jan. 12 (UPI) --A "emergency alert" at a nuclear power plant in Ontario was "issued by mistake," the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission said Sunday. Millions of residents received the alert at 7:19 ...
via Bing News