Introducing concept to undergrads could lead to more transparency in science
The ability to duplicate an experiment and its results is a central tenet of the scientific method, but recent research has shown an alarming number of peer-reviewed papers are irreproducible.
A team of math and statistics professors has proposed a way to address one root of that problem by teaching reproducibility to aspiring scientists, using software that makes the concept feel logical rather than cumbersome.
Researchers from Smith College, Duke University and Amherst College looked at how introductory statistics students responded to a curriculum modified to stress reproducibility. Their work is detailed in a paper published Feb. 25 in the journal Technological Innovations in Statistics Education.
In 2013, on the heels of several retraction scandals and studies showing reproducibility ratesas low as 10 percent for peer-reviewed articles, the prominent scientific journal Nature dedicated a special issue to the concerns over irreproducibility.
Nature’s editors announced measures to address the problem in its own pages, and encouraged the science community and funders to direct their attention to better training of young scientists.
“Too few biologists receive adequate training in statistics and other quantitative aspects of their subject,” the editors wrote. “Mentoring of young scientists on matters of rigour and transparency is inconsistent at best.”
The authors of the present study thus looked to their own classrooms for ways to incorporate the idea of reproducibility.
“Reproducing a scientific study usually has two components: reproducing the experiment, and reproducing the analysis,” said Ben Baumer, visiting assistant professor of math and statistics at Smith College. “As statistics instructors, we wanted to emphasize the latter to our students.”
The grade school maxim to “show your work” doesn’t hold in the average introductory statistics class, said Mine Cetinkaya-Rundel, assistant professor of the practice in the Duke statistics department. In a typical workflow, a college-level statistics student will perform data analysis in one software package, but transfer the results into something better suited to presentation, like Microsoft Word or Microsoft PowerPoint.
Though standard, this workflow divorces the raw data and analysis from the final results, making it difficult for students to retrace their steps. The process can give rise to errors, and in many cases, the authors write, “the copy-and-paste paradigm enables, and even encourages, selective reporting.”
“Usually, a data analysis report, even a published paper, isn’t going to include the code,” Cetinkaya-Rundel said. “But at the intro level, where this is the first time students are exposed to this workflow, it helps to keep intact both the final results and the code used to generate them.”
Enter R Markdown, a statistical package that integrates seamlessly with the programming language R. The team chose R Markdown for its ease of use — students wouldn’t have to learn a new computer syntax — and because it combines the raw data, computing and written analysis into one HTML document. The researchers hoped a single HTML file would give students a start-to-finish understanding of assignments, as well as make studying and grading easier.
The study introduced R Markdown to 417 introductory statistics students (272 from Duke University, 145 from Smith College) during the 2012-2013 school year. Instructors emphasized the lesson of reproducibility throughout each course and surveyed 70 students about their experience using R Markdown for homework assignments.
The Latest on: Scientific Reproducibility
via Google News
The Latest on: Scientific Reproducibility
- Brewing a better espresso, the scientific wayon January 22, 2020 at 10:17 am
"Though there are clear strategies to reduce waste and improve reproducibility, there is no obvious optimal espresso point," says computational chemist Christopher Hendon from the University of ...
- Software searches out reproducibility issues in scientific paperson January 22, 2020 at 10:15 am
In recent years, problems with identifying the antibodies used in research have been highlighted as a factor in the lack of reproducibility in the academic literature. “It is shocking that so many ...
- Measuring the world of social phenomenaon January 21, 2020 at 10:26 am
Economists working with Professor Marko Sarstedt from Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg are demanding that the same scientific standards be applied to economics and ... in measured values must be ...
- Capillary Electrophoresis Market showing footprints for Strong Annual Saleson January 21, 2020 at 12:13 am
Advance Market Analytics released the research report of Global Capillary Electrophoresis Market, offers a detailed overview of the factors influencing the global business scope. Global Capillary ...
- AMIA Urges NIH to Revise Proposed Data Management, Sharing Policyon January 16, 2020 at 10:02 am
With these recommendations, AMIA aims to help NIH better leverage data for research and reproducibility. “The opportunity inherent in this policy is to organize, categorize, and manage scientific data ...
- UK Group Tackles Reproducibility in Researchon January 7, 2020 at 10:44 am
These and other recent findings on the lack of reproducibility in scientific research have inspired the creation of groups such as the UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN). The Scientist spoke with ...
- OncoCyte Announces Successful Completion of CLIA Validation Study of DetermaDxon January 7, 2020 at 4:00 am
including demonstration of excellent reproducibility,” said Lyndal Hesterberg, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer of OncoCyte. “Every year more than 1.6 million lung nodules are detected on imaging, but ...
- Nobel Prize scientist and team retract scientific paperon January 4, 2020 at 10:51 am
Most importantly, it's the right thing to do," wrote another netizen and scientist Tim Triche Jr. The reproducibility of a scientific experiment's results is important in proving its validity.
- Scientific Reproducibility: Raising the Standards for Biomedicineon January 2, 2020 at 4:00 pm
At one level, a system for checking on scientific reproducibility could demand that each component be reproduced in specific detail. However, this demand seems unrealistic, particularly in ...
- ESIP Introduces New Data and Software Citation Guidelines Aimed at Making Earth Science Research FAIRon December 8, 2019 at 4:00 pm
but these citations are an increasingly important scientific practice and aid scientific reproducibility through direct, unambiguous reference to the precise software or service used in a ...
via Bing News