Mean surface temperature change for 1999–2008 relative to the average temperatures from 1940 to 1980 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
As a range of climate change mitigation scenarios are discussed, Univ. of Washington researchers have found that the injection of sulfate particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and curb the effects of global warming could pose a severe threat if not maintained indefinitely and supported by strict reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
The new study, published Feb. 18, 2014, in IOP Publishing’s journal Environmental Research Letters, has highlighted the risks of large and spatially expansive temperature increases if solar radiation management (SRM) is abruptly stopped once it has been implemented.
SRM is a proposed method of geoengineering whereby tiny sulfate-based aerosols are released into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. The technique has been shown to be economically and technically feasible; however, its efficacy depends on its continued maintenance, without interruption from technical faults, global cooperation breakdown or funding running dry.
According to the study, global temperature increases could more than double if SRM is implemented for a multi-decadal period of time and then suddenly stopped, in relation to the temperature increases expected if SRM was not implemented at all.
The researchers used a global climate model to show that if an extreme emissions pathway—RCP8.5—is followed up until 2035, allowing temperatures to rise 1 C above the 1970–1999 mean, and then SRM is implemented for 25 years and suddenly stopped, global temperatures could increase by 4 C in the following decades.
This rate of increase, caused by the build-up of background greenhouse gas emissions, would be well beyond the bounds experienced in the last century and more than double the 2 C temperature increase that would occur in the same timeframe if SRM had not been implemented.
On a regional and seasonal scale, the temperature changes would be largest in an absolute sense in winter over high latitude land, but compared to historical fluctuations, temperature changes would be largest in the tropics in summertime, where there is usually very little variation.
Lead author of the research, Kelly McCusker, from the Univ. of Washington, said: “According to our simulations, tropical regions like South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are hit particularly hard, the very same regions that are home to many of the world’s most food insecure populations. The potential temperature changes also pose a severe threat to biodiversity.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Geoengineering is no climate fix. But calling it a moral hazard could be counterproductiveon December 10, 2019 at 3:21 am
These methods, lumped under the heading of geoengineering, aim to reduce the impact of greenhouse gases on global temperatures, and thus on sea-level rise. Many experts are already worried that public ...
- Turns Out A Wild Geoengineering Plan To Refreeze Arctic Sea Ice Isn't The Best Ideaon December 8, 2019 at 1:51 pm
As the world spins closer to climate catastrophe, fringe ideas are inching toward the mainstream. Geoengineering is among the topics that were once verboten but are now finding traction. And that ...
- Can solar geoengineering save us from climate change?on October 18, 2019 at 2:27 am
One of my favourite quotes on using solar geoengineering to combat global warming comes from agricultural economist Jonathan Proctor. Speaking to The Atlantic in August 2018, he said: “You’re in an ...
- In a climate crisis, is geoengineering worth the risks?on October 6, 2019 at 5:09 am
Geoengineering ideas — tinkering with the climate to delay or halt the worst effects of global warming — have been around for decades. Few such ideas have progressed past the thought experiment stage, ...
- Geoengineering is a Scamon October 4, 2019 at 1:47 am
And by stripping climate science of its political dimensions, oil and gas companies like the one Tillerson used to run will continue to blind many young scientists and engineers with one absurd idea: ...
- Saving Pacific Islanders from geoengineeringon September 29, 2019 at 11:39 am
SUVA – Geoengineering will save us from the climate crisis, its champions insist. By using technology either to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere or to deflect some solar radiation away from ...
- Why Solar Geoengineering May Be Our Only Hope To Reverse Global Warmingon September 10, 2019 at 3:01 am
Last Wednesday night, as I watched the climate discussions with each of the Democratic Party candidates on CNN’s Presidential Climate Town Hall, I kept asking, “Why is only Andrew Yang talking about ...
- What is geoengineering—and why should you care?on August 8, 2019 at 9:14 pm
Traditionally, geoengineering has encompassed two very different things: sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky so the atmosphere will trap less heat, and reflecting more sunlight away from the planet ...
- Geoengineering is very controversial. How can you do experiments? Harvard has some ideas.on July 29, 2019 at 7:43 am
Our ongoing series following a Harvard research team’s efforts to conduct one of the first outdoor geoengineering experiments, and exploring the scientific, ethical, environmental and political ...
- Could geoengineering really help us solve the climate crisis?on May 16, 2019 at 6:56 am
With activist Greta Thunberg and the Extinction Rebellion protestors leading the calls for urgent action on climate change, interest is turning once again to geoengineering. The Intergovernmental ...
via Bing News