Climate change is having an impact in every ecosystem, from equator to pole and from ocean to mountain.
“THE four horsemen of the apocalypse”: that was the disparaging appraisal by Richard Tol of the University of Sussex of a report published in Yokohama on March 31st by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a group of scientists (including Dr Tol) who provide governments round the world with mainstream scientific guidance on the climate. Every six or so years, the IPCC produces a monster three-part encyclopedia; the first instalment of its most recent assessment came out last September and argued that climate change was speeding up, even if global surface temperatures were flat. The new tranche looks at the even more pertinent matter of how the climate is affecting the Earth’s ecosystems, the economy and peoples’ livelihoods.
Profoundly, is the headline answer, even though temperatures have warmed by only 0.8°C since 1800. They are likely to warm by at least twice that amount (and probably much more) by 2100. The report—the first since the collapse in 2009 of attempts to draw up a global treaty to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions—argues that climate change is having an impact in every ecosystem, from equator to pole and from ocean to mountain. It says that while there are a few benefits to a warmer climate, the overwhelming effects are negative and will get worse. It talks of “extreme weather events leading to breakdown of…critical services such as electricity, water supply and health and emergency services”; about a “risk of severe ill-health and disrupted livelihoods for large urban populations due to inland flooding”; and sounds the alarm about “the breakdown of food systems, linked to warming”.
Behind such headline scares, though, lies a subtler story, in which the effects of global warming vary a lot, in which climate change is one risk among many, and in which the damage—and the possibility of reducing it—depends as much on the other factors, such as health systems or rural development, as it does on global warming itself.
Compared with previous IPCC reports—the last was in 2007—the new one is confident about its assessment of damages, and more willing to attribute the harm to human influence on the climate. Take the rise in sea levels, which (pushed up by thermal expansion) has been increasing more in the 14 years of this century than it did from 1971 to 2000. The report reckons that, at current rates, average sea levels could rise by another half a metre or more by the end of the century, if greenhouse gases are not significantly curtailed. That is nothing but bad news for the people living in cities vulnerable to flooding from the sea: they now number 271m, and may increase to 345m by 2050, says the IPCC (some estimates put the figures higher). Nor are there any benefits from ocean acidification (caused by the absorption of carbon dioxide in seawater) which the report calls “a fundamental challenge to marine organisms and ecosystems”.
Equally stressed are terrestrial ecosystems facing sudden and irreversible change: climate “tipping points”. In the Arctic, for example, which is warming faster than any other large environment on earth, new shrubs and plants are invading formerly inhospitable areas. The vast boreal forests or Siberia and Canada are dying back faster than was expected in 2007, and may be more sensitive to warming than was then thought.
On the other hand, there are substantial areas where the influence of the climate is modest compared with other factors. Health is one. Pollution from factories adds to global warming and causes health problems directly: a new report by the World Health Organisation linked around 7m deaths to air pollution. In a warmer world, some diseases, such as malaria, will spread their range. Heat-related deaths will rise but cold-related ones will fall. In parts of the world where there are more cold-related than heat-related deaths, such as northern Europe, warmer temperatures could actually reduce the number of early deaths. By and large, the report says, the negative impacts will outweigh the positive ones but, for good or ill, the climate is not the dominant influence on mortality and morbidity. Public health and nutrition matter more.
Something similar is true for civil conflicts. Poverty and economic shocks help cause conflicts and are themselves influenced by climate change. Global warming can bring about changes in land use, reduce water supplies, and push up food prices, all of which contribute to riots (arguably, all this happened in Darfur). But it is hard to show that climate change has had a direct impact on levels or patterns of violence. If anything, it is the other way around: conflict reduces peoples’ ability to cope with climate change by, for example, laying mines in farmland. Surprisingly, global warming does not seem to be the culprit in most extinctions, either. With the exception of some frog species in Central America, no recent extinctions have been attributed to climate change.
So climate change has been powerful (in the oceans) and secondary (in health). But there is a third category: areas where the climate has had a large distributional effect, which may be good or bad, but usually appears to be negative. Fish are the most mobile of creatures and as the seas warm, marine animals and plants follow the cooler waters, migrating from the tropics to temperate latitudes. Benthic (bottom-feeding) algae are moving polewards at a rate of 10km per decade; phytoplankton are moving at over 400km a decade. The result, says the report, is that by 2055, fish yields in temperate latitudes could be 30%-70% higher than they were in 2005 (assuming there are any fish left by then) whereas the tropical fish yield will fall 40-60%. A similar distributional change, the scientists argue, is affecting the hydrological cycle: the rate at which groundwater is recharged is likely to increase in temperate climes and fall in tropical ones, leading to further drying of the soil in the dry tropics.
The most important distributional change, the IPCC reckons, concerns food, especially cereal crops.
The Latest on: Climate change
via Google News
The Latest on: Climate change
- Young conservatives urge GOP to take lead on climate changeon February 27, 2020 at 10:13 pm
A group of young Republicans at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) advised attendees Thursday to take the lead on climate change — or else watch Democrats enact new rules of ...
- Shared concern over climate change among Democratic primary supporterson February 27, 2020 at 8:22 pm
About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, ...
- As climate change bites, NBN is looking to preinstall satellite links at evacuation centreson February 27, 2020 at 5:20 pm
In contrast to its political masters, the Australian government-owned broadband wholesaler has said it is taking the threat of climate change seriously. Speaking to the Joint Standing Committee on the ...
- Climate change, economic development highlight budgeton February 27, 2020 at 4:44 pm
HERKIMER -- Gov. Andrew Cuomo's executive budget proposal seeks to address climate change and bring about economic development in the state -- two things state Office of General Services Commissioner ...
- Trustee Who Funds Climate Change Skeptics Leaves Natural History Boardon February 27, 2020 at 3:18 pm
Rebekah Mercer, whose family foundation was a major Trump donor, stepped down from the museum when her term expired in December. Rebekah Mercer, an influential donor to conservative causes — including ...
- Tom Steyer bets his campaign on climate change in South Carolinaon February 27, 2020 at 2:48 pm
“The weather’s nice,” she said, “But I saw a lot of storms.” Climate change was on Collington’s mind on a damp Wednesday afternoon when she went to hear billionaire former hedge-fund manager and ...
- Court rules London Heathrow runway plan would violate climate change commitmentson February 27, 2020 at 11:38 am
Britain is hosting a major United Nations climate change conference later this year, and the U.K. will be keen to brandish its green credentials before world leaders descend on Glasgow in November.
- A.R. Rahman, Ken Kragen Gathering Stars for ‘We Are the World’-Style Climate Change Singleon February 27, 2020 at 11:11 am
He’s looking to marshal the same kind of all-star forces and populist appeal that came together in the mid-’80s for a new song, “Hands Around the World,” that’s designed to raise funds and awareness ...
- Democratic Primary Voters Increasingly Worried About Climate Changeon February 27, 2020 at 9:12 am
But as Super Tuesday approaches this presidential election year, the 80-year-old undecided voter can't stop thinking about climate change. "The winters are warmer than they used to be," she says. "We ...
- Jeff Bezos' climate change philanthropy has quite a few (hidden) strings attachedon February 27, 2020 at 5:11 am
The wealthy have a clear incentive to make minor tweaks to the existing system instead of overhauling it to create a truly sustainable society.
via Bing News