Since 1955, The Journal of Irreproducible Results has offered “spoofs, parodies, whimsies, burlesques, lampoons and satires” about life in the laboratory.
Among its greatest hits: “Acoustic Oscillations in Jell-O, With and Without Fruit, Subjected to Varying Levels of Stress” and “Utilizing Infinite Loops to Compute an Approximate Value of Infinity.” The good-natured jibes are a backhanded celebration of science. What really goes on in the lab is, by implication, of a loftier, more serious nature.
It has been jarring to learn in recent years that a reproducible result may actually be the rarest of birds. Replication, the ability of another lab to reproduce a finding, is the gold standard of science, reassurance that you have discovered something true. But that is getting harder all the time. With the most accessible truths already discovered, what remains are often subtle effects, some so delicate that they can be conjured up only under ideal circumstances, using highly specialized techniques.
Fears that this is resulting in some questionable findings began to emerge in 2005, when Dr. John P. A. Ioannidis, a kind of meta-scientist who researches research, wrote a paper pointedly titled “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.”
Given the desire for ambitious scientists to break from the pack with a striking new finding, Dr. Ioannidis reasoned, many hypotheses already start with a high chance of being wrong. Otherwise proving them right would not be so difficult and surprising — and supportive of a scientist’s career. Taking into account the human tendency to see what we want to see, unconscious bias is inevitable. Without any ill intent, a scientist may be nudged toward interpreting the data so it supports the hypothesis, even if just barely.
The effect is amplified by competition for a shrinking pool of grant money and also by the design of so many experiments — with small sample sizes (cells in a lab dish or people in an epidemiological pool) and weak standards for what passes as statistically significant. That makes it all the easier to fool oneself.
Paradoxically the hottest fields, with the most people pursuing the same questions, are most prone to error, Dr. Ioannidis argued. If one of five competing labs is alone in finding an effect, that result is the one likely to be published. But there is a four in five chance that it is wrong. Papers reporting negative conclusions are more easily ignored.
Putting all of this together, Dr. Ioannidis devised a mathematical model supporting the conclusion that most published findings are probably incorrect.
The Latest on: Research results
via Google News
The Latest on: Research results
- VUNO Boasts its AI Solutions and Research Results at RSNA 2020on November 27, 2020 at 7:00 am
South Korean artificial intelligence (AI) developer VUNO Inc. announced that it will join the Radiological Society of North America 2020 (RSNA 2020), a week-long event scheduled to be open on Nov. 29.
- NMSU science centers provide agricultural industry with research-based solutionson November 27, 2020 at 1:45 am
New Mexico’s $3.17 billion agricultural industry is as diverse as the state’s environmental conditions. With four crop production regions, 11 plant hardiness zones, five defined watersheds and 126 ...
- World Leaders Welcome COVID-19 Positive Research Resultson November 13, 2020 at 12:15 am
World leaders welcomed the news from pharmaceutical firm Pfizer that Stage 3 trials showed its coronavirus vaccine was 90% effective in providing immunity to the disease. However scientists and ...
- Vitamin D And Fish Oil Supplements Mostly Disappoint In Long-Awaited Research Resultson November 10, 2020 at 7:01 am
Now, long-awaited government-funded research has produced some of the clearest evidence yet about the usefulness of taking the supplements. And the results — published in two papers — are ...
- Pueblo native pens historical work on Indian Warson November 5, 2020 at 12:25 pm
A retired college philosophy professor and Pueblo native with deep ties to the region has, after more than two decades of research, released the historical fruits of those labors. Jeff Broome's ...
- Specsavers across Cumbria will remain open during lockdown – following concerning research resultson November 4, 2020 at 9:08 pm
According to research carried out by the company, 32% of those asked found their eyesight worsened during the March-April lockdown. So the team is determined to be there for customers this month ...
- AMRA Medical Research Results Support Strengthening Sarcopenia Guidelineson October 28, 2020 at 9:02 am
This research is accepted for publication in JHEP ... AMRA expects to continue to release more results on how the growing societal burden of sarcopenia effects specific population groups in ...
- SPARK Taiwan helps TMU medical startup teams commercialize research resultson October 27, 2020 at 4:37 am
Among them, Taipei Medical University (TMU) was selected to join the program (named TMU SPARK) in 2014 and has incubated 51 research teams in six years. Having achieved outstanding results ...
- Relationship Between Conflicts of Interest and Research Resultson October 22, 2020 at 5:00 pm
Results: Depending on the COI criteria used ... and editors is an important and sensitive issue facing biomedical research. There is a need to comprehensively evaluate the degree of influence ...
- ERA-EDTA e-seminars spotlight on implementing new research results in clinical practiceon October 22, 2020 at 12:47 pm
London, UK – 22 October, 2020 – The underlying idea is to bridge the gap between research and practice ... study population and results, and, most importantly, to evaluate the results by ...
via Bing News