Researchers in the United States have suggested an alternative way to allocate science funding.
The method, which is described in EMBO reports, depends on a collective distribution of funding by the scientific community, requires only a fraction of the costs associated with the traditional peer review of grant proposals and, according to the authors, may yield comparable or even better results.
“Peer review of scientific proposals and grants has served science very well for decades. However, there is a strong sense in the scientific community that things could be improved,” said Johan Bollen, professor and lead author of the study from the School of Informatics and Computing at Indiana Univ. “Our most productive researchers invest an increasing amount of time, energy, and effort into writing and reviewing research proposals, most of which do not get funded. That time could be spent performing the proposed research in the first place.” He added: “Our proposal does not just save time and money but also encourages innovation.”
The new approach is possible due to recent advances in mathematics and computer technologies. The system involves giving all scientists an annual, unconditional fixed amount of funding to conduct their research. All funded scientists are, however, obliged to donate a fixed percentage of all of the funding that they previously received to other researchers. As a result, the funding circulates through the community, converging on researchers that are expected to make the best use of it. “Our alternative funding system is inspired by the mathematical models used to search the internet for relevant information,” said Bollen. “The decentralized funding model uses the wisdom of the entire scientific community to determine a fair distribution of funding.”
The authors believe that this system can lead to sophisticated behavior at a global level. It would certainly liberate researchers from the time-consuming process of submitting and reviewing project proposals, but could also reduce the uncertainty associated with funding cycles, give researchers much greater flexibility, and allow the community to fund risky but high-reward projects that existing funding systems may overlook.
“You could think of it as a Google-inspired crowd-funding system that encourages all researchers to make autonomous, individual funding decisions towards people, not projects or proposals,” said Bollen. “All you need is a centralized website where researchers could log-in, enter the names of the scientists they chose to donate to, and specify how much they each should receive.”
The Latest on: Science funding
via Google News
The Latest on: Science funding
- Cell C and Explore Data Science Academy provide training for South Africa’s futureon June 1, 2020 at 10:29 pm
In an increasingly digital world, South Africa is facing a growing challenge to upskill future generations entering the job market. According to a report from The Economist in 2017, data has replaced ...
- India's drug regulator grants Gilead Sciences marketing authorisation for remdesiviron June 1, 2020 at 8:23 pm
India's drug regulator has granted US pharma giant Gilead Sciences marketing authorisation for its anti-viral drug remdesivir for "restricted emergency use" on hospitalised COVID-19 patients.
- Hemlock Semiconductor awards grants to USS Edson Museum, Chesaning Future Farmerson June 1, 2020 at 2:21 pm
Operations recently awarded special grants to various community organizations throughout Saginaw, Bay and Midland counties. Ten recipients were chosen in May for Community and Regional Empowerment ...
- China’s Funding of U.S. University Scientists Requires a Watchdogon June 1, 2020 at 12:23 pm
President Gerald Ford signed an executive order establishing the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, otherwise known as “CFIUS,” which is an important tool for the Department of the ...
- With CPRIT funding, UTA cancer researcher establishes new labon June 1, 2020 at 10:03 am
With $2 million in support from the Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT), The University of Texas at Arlington has added an emerging leader in cancer biology to its faculty and ...
- Oncology Nursing Foundation Commits $420,000 to Support Oncology Nursing Research Grantson June 1, 2020 at 9:41 am
"Implementation science can help bridge the gap between what we know and how we practice in order ... Thanks to the generosity of individuals and institutions, the Oncology Nursing Foundation has ...
- How a new biotech rule will foster distrust with the public and impede progress in scienceon June 1, 2020 at 5:17 am
A new biotech regulation allows companies to self-police and decide which crops should be regulated. The new rule is likely to amplify greater distrust of GM crops.
- Peru’s war on drugs is an abject failure – here’s what it can learn from Boliviaon May 30, 2020 at 1:08 am
Production of coca leaf, the raw material in cocaine, is surging in Peru despite 40 years of forced eradication designed to convince farmers to abandon it. Bolivia shows a better way forward.
- 5 questions for Tony Mills on public science funding from World War II to presenton May 28, 2020 at 12:43 pm
Tony Mills discusses why policymakers should focus more on funding basic science, drawing upon the example of World War II-era innovation.
- Coronavirus Roundup: Pentagon Plans for Return to Normalcy; Lawmakers Seek More Research and Funding for Science Amid the Pandemicon May 27, 2020 at 10:42 am
Public health experts and politicians have been raising concerns that the coronavirus outbreak has a mental impact in addition to physical one due to increased isolation, fears of financial losses, ...
via Bing News