Members of the public have a negative view of climate engineering, the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the environment to counteract climate change, according to a new study.
The results are from researchers from the University of Southampton and Massey University (New Zealand) who have undertaken the first systematic large-scale evaluation of the public reaction to climate engineering.
The work is published in Nature Climate Change this week (12 January 2014).
Some scientists think that climate engineering approaches will be required to combat the inexorable rise in atmospheric CO2 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Climate engineering could involve techniques that reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere or approaches that slow temperature rise by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth’s surface.
Co-author Professor Damon Teagle of the University of Southampton said: “Because even the concept of climate engineering is highly controversial, there is pressing need to consult the public and understand their concerns before policy decisions are made.”
Lead author, Professor Malcolm Wright of Massey University, said: “Previous attempts to engage the public with climate engineering have been exploratory and small scale. In our study, we have drawn on commercial methods used to evaluate brands and new product concepts to develop a comparative approach for evaluating the public reaction to a variety of climate engineering concepts.”
The results show that the public has strong negative views towards climate engineering. Where there are positive reactions, they favour approaches that reduce carbon dioxide over those that reflected sunlight.
“It was a striking result and a very clear pattern,” said Professor Wright. “Interventions such as putting mirrors in space or fine particles into the stratosphere are not well received. More natural processes of cloud brightening or enhanced weathering are less likely to raise objections, but the public react best to creating biochar (making charcoal from vegetation to lock in CO2) or capturing carbon directly from the air.”
Nonetheless, even the most well regarded techniques still has a net negative perception.
The work consulted large representative samples in both Australia and New Zealand. Co-author Pam Feetham said: “The responses are remarkably consistent from both countries, with surprisingly few variations except for a slight tendency for older respondents to view climate engineering more favourably.”
The Latest on: Climate Engineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Climate Engineering
- Making Climate a National Security Issue Downplays Human Coston November 27, 2020 at 3:29 am
Biden’s climate czar has a seat on the National Security Council, but environmentalists should be cautious of embracing the military’s approach ...
- Canada’s new climate plan: Q&A about Bill C-12on November 25, 2020 at 11:37 am
If Canada began to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by about four per cent per year, we could still meet our 2030 climate targets.
- So how much change can Biden bring on climate change?on November 23, 2020 at 4:27 pm
Still, Harvard experts in climate and the environment say much can be done, but the question is: How much? They do expect the incoming administration will be able to set some measures in place to ...
- Some Amazon rainforest regions more resistant to climate change than previously thoughton November 20, 2020 at 11:03 am
Forests can help mitigate climate change, by taking in carbon dioxide during photosynthesis and storing it in their biomass (tree trunks, roots, etc.). In fact, forests currently take in around 25-30% ...
- YCEC speaker series hosts climate science communicator John Abrahamon November 19, 2020 at 11:47 pm
On Thursday, the Yale Center for Environmental Communication virtually welcomed John Abraham, a professor and the program director of thermal sciences at the University of St. Thomas School of ...
- Why do Americans like it to be 72 degrees inside?on November 13, 2020 at 9:45 am
Erik Olsen leads the New York team of climate engineering company Transsolar KlimaEngineering. He is passionate about human comfort and low-impact solutions for our environment. Transsolar is ...
- Engineering a way out of climate change: Genetically modified organisms could be the keyon November 11, 2020 at 6:18 am
Fighting the imminent climate change crisis has now become a global priority. In this regard, scientists in the US have discussed how gene editing technology can modify plants and organisms to reduce ...
- Engineering a way out of climate change: Genetically modified organisms could be the keyon November 11, 2020 at 6:16 am
Climate change is a major global crisis ... is the Metcalf Professor of Science and Engineering at Boston University. He received a BA in History from the City College of New York and PhD in ...
- Climate Science on Tap Presents Climate Engineering: What Is It and Should It Be Field Tested?on November 1, 2020 at 4:00 pm
Hours: Kitchen: Sun noon-10pm, Mon 4 pm-10 pm, Tues-Fri 4 pm-11 pm, Sat noon-11 pm ...
- Could geo-engineering help reverse climate change?on March 14, 2019 at 1:26 am
argue that climate engineering could represent a temporary "corrective measure". Switzerland’s Federal Office for the Environment has said that the country would also prefer not to rely on a ...
via Bing News