BLUNT criticism is an essential part of science, for it is how bad ideas are winnowed from good ones.
So when Randy Schekman, one of the 2013 crop of Nobel prize-winners (for physiology or medicine, in his case), decided to criticise the way scientific journals are run, he did not hold back.
Dr Schekman chose the week of the prizegiving (the medals and cheques were handed over on December 10th) to announce that the laboratory he runs at the University of California, Berkeley, will boycott what he describes as “luxury journals”. By that he meant those commonly regarded as the most prestigious, such as Cell, Nature and Science.
He levels two charges against such journals. The first is that, aware of their pre-eminence and keen to protect it, they artificially restrict the number of papers they accept—acting, as he put it in an interview with the Guardian, a British newspaper, like “fashion designers who create limited-edition handbags or suits…know[ing] scarcity stokes demand”. Their behaviour, he says, is more conducive to the selling of subscriptions than the publishing of the best research.
Second, he argues that science as a whole is being distorted by perverse incentives, especially the tyranny of the “impact factor”, a number that purports to measure how important a given journal is. Researchers who publish in journals with a high impact factor—like the three named above—can expect promotion, pay rises and professional accolades. Those that do not can expect obscurity or even the sack, a Darwinian system known among academics as “publish or perish”.
The Latest on: What’s wrong with Science
via Google News
The Latest on: What’s wrong with Science
- How the coronavirus will permanently change healthcare, according to 26 top industry leaderson May 12, 2020 at 7:44 am
Coronavirus is changing the future of the healthcare industry.
- Science Fairs Are Canceled. Maybe That’s Just as Wellon May 10, 2020 at 7:00 am
It’s time to reconsider these earnest events—and find ways for kids to experience the joyous, collaborative nature of real scientific discovery.
- EVE SIMMONS: What’s so wrong with a doctor on the Covid front line enjoying a doughnut on his break?on May 2, 2020 at 3:01 pm
Becoming infected with coronavirus undoubtedly tops the list of current health fears for most Britons. But getting fat seems to come a close second.
- Gov. Larry Hogan is everywhere. What’s his game? And is there a downside?on April 30, 2020 at 6:05 am
Is Gov. Larry Hogan, a term-limited chief executive who turns 64 next month, positioning himself for life after his second term?
- What's Gone Wrong With Plastic Recyclingon April 29, 2020 at 5:00 pm
“That was absolutely the wrong message. The message should have ... is reducing the generation and use of plastic.” I'm a science journalist who writes about health for Consumer Reports.
- Piers Morgan blasts Home Office minister Victoria Atkins for 'laughing' over PPE shortageson April 28, 2020 at 2:21 am
One wrote on Twitter: "I am sick of hearing every Tory minister say 'we have followed the science' when they appear ... annihilating Victoria Atkins!! Whats wrong with this government that they ...
- Dr Hilary fears second wave of coronavirus deaths as he issues stark warning to Britson April 27, 2020 at 1:56 am
Good Morning Britain's Dr Hilary Jones has issued a stark warning to Brits after admitting he fears a second wave of coronavirus cases. The health expert was answering questions alongside Piers Morgan ...
- What’s wrong with my tree?on April 26, 2020 at 3:47 pm
What’s wrong with my tree? Sometimes crispy leaf margins are a sign of salt stress. Watering to a deeper depth a few times can help move the salts lower in the soil profile. Check out this story ...
- How Partner Are Coping with Isolation: EDM, Learning Music Production and Hating Capitalismon April 6, 2020 at 11:41 am
I particularly love this series called World Science Festival ... no kind of response will actually address whats wrong at the core, which is that capitalism sucks. And the most vulnerable ...
- “What’s Wrong With Equal Rights for Women”on February 12, 2017 at 7:45 pm
So what’s wrong with that? Well ... When his speech to the American Political Science Association Convention is stripped of its egghead verbiage, his argument is that men should eagerly look ...
via Bing News