A Stanford law professor warns that in a world of 3-D printing, people may not be protected under traditional product liability law if they buy a risky home-printed object and get hurt. Rather, they could be left to pursue harder-to-prove negligence lawsuits.
While 3-D printing technology empowers people to create amazing objects once unimagined, it also raises red flags on the legal concept of strict product liability, according to a Stanford law professor.
Nora Freeman Engstrom, an associate professor, published her research in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, exploring how 3-D printing is poised to challenge the American litigation landscape.
3-D printers can produce elaborate three-dimensional products of almost any shape, working from designs on a computer screen. The technology has become affordable for individuals, allowing them in effect to become “manufacturers” of any number of objects, from plastic vases to bionic ears, and from high heels to handguns.
What does this mean for consumer protection? That’s the crux of Engstrom’s legal question.
“Following any significant technological breakthrough,” she wrote, “legal scholars, practitioners and policymakers must consider how the innovation meshes with – or poses challenges to – our existing laws and system of governance. Will it fit? What must change? Where are the pitfalls and opportunities? 3-D printing is no exception.”
Winning a lawsuit
Under current “strict liability” product law, a person who is injured by a defective product can win a lawsuit without necessarily showing that the maker or distributor of the product was negligent.
“This means,” she said, “if you fall ill from eating tainted peanut butter you purchased at, say, Wal-Mart, you can sue Wal-Mart for your injuries – and you can prevail in that lawsuit even if Wal-Mart used all possible care in the peanut butter’s selection, storage and sale.”
On the other hand, Engstrom said, a person injured by a home-printed product would likely only be left with a negligence-based lawsuit. Negligence focuses on proving that the manufacturer, distributor or seller of the product was careless – a higher hurdle.
Why is the legal treatment different for home-printed products? She said that part of the answer is due to the “commercial-casual divide” in product liability doctrine. “This divide refers to the fact that product liability law only applies to ‘commercial’ sellers – defined as those engaged in the business of selling or otherwise distributing products.”
Casual sellers, such as a housewife who makes and sells jam or a child who makes and sells lemonade, fall outside the scope of product liability laws. Engstrom said that hobbyist 3-D inventors, who print products in their garages and on their kitchen countertops, are arguably casual, rather than commercial sellers – so strict product liability laws likely won’t apply.
As a result, she said, if home 3-D printing “really does take off, product liability litigation as we know it may, in large measure, dry up.” At the least, she said, it will erode some of the protections under the current doctrine.
The Latest on: 3-D printing product liability issues
via Google News
The Latest on: 3-D printing product liability issues
- DWS Group Expands ESG ETF Offeringson May 12, 2020 at 2:00 pm
To provide investors with greater ESG exposure across asset classes, DWS Group, one of the world's leading asset managers, today announced changes to ...
- $2,000 Stimulus Checks - And What Happens To Social Security And Retirement When The Money Printer Goes Brrr?on May 12, 2020 at 11:28 am
Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders and Ed Markey introduced a bill Friday to give most Americans $2,000 a month during the coronavirus pandemic, as historic job losses leave millions scrambling to cover ...
- 3D Printing And The Shifting Legal Landscape For COVID-19on May 8, 2020 at 12:12 pm
As the 3D printing community steps in to address the shortage of critical medical supplies, attorneys at Arnold & Porter highlight key issues regarding the scope of new immunities, the evolving U.S.
- Creality 3D to Provide Most Hassle-free 3D Printing Experience with Launch of Latest 3D Printer CR-6 SE Featuring Innovative Auto-leveling Techon May 6, 2020 at 5:00 am
The Chinese 3D printer brand, Creality 3D, which is well-known for its economic consumer-grade desktop FDM DIY 3D printers Ender-3 series ...
- Millions of products have been 3-D printed for the coronavirus pandemic—but they bring riskson May 5, 2020 at 6:28 am
With the COVID-19 pandemic, an urgent need has risen worldwide for specialized health and medical products. In a scramble to meet demand, "makers" in Australia and internationally have turned to 3-D ...
- Mubadala Healthcare initiates 3D printing solution for critical medical supplies amid Covid-19 outbreakon May 4, 2020 at 4:43 am
In an ongoing effort to find innovative solutions to the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, Mubadala Healthcare has reached out to NYU Abu Dhabi (NYUAD) to utilize its 3D printing and Core ...
- 3D Printing Holds Promise And Risk During Pandemicon April 30, 2020 at 2:41 pm
The COVID-19 pandemic has stoked interest in using 3D printing to create personal protective equipment and other medical devices, but businesses and individuals should be aware of liability risks and ...
- Velo3D, a supplier of 3D printers to SpaceX, raises $28 millionon April 28, 2020 at 11:14 am
“We are creating the seeds with the first customers that are using our product ... issues manufacturing that using existing techniques,” said Buller. “SpaceX has been using 3D printing ...
- You Can't Print Storageon April 28, 2020 at 10:59 am
Market attention has focused on the recent downside implosion of the May WTI contract into negative territory. While historic, the current term structure of oil ...
- 3D Printing Could Help Now, Except for the IP Issueson April 15, 2020 at 10:20 am
3D printing is a perfect solution to address these issues. Currently ... is protecting the property rights of those creating product designs. Digital goods are notoriously difficult to protect.
via Bing News