The geoengineering technique might have some unintended benefits, like more rainfall, but also consequences if ever interrupted
Researchers have wondered for years whether we will one day be able to re-engineer the planet and slow down, perhaps even pause, global warming. A recent study out of Norway is now the first to describe how that might be done.
There are many ways to try and climate engineer the planet, but many of them are so far-fetched that scientists aren’t sure if they would even be physically possible, let alone physically successful. Sea-salt climate engineering (SSCE) might be the most low-tech, and plausible, possibility.
In such a situation, specially designed unmanned boats would plow the seas, spraying salt water into the air. The water would evaporate and leave behind sea-salt particles, which may be lifted into the clouds, increasing their albedo, or reflecting power.
A study released last month in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheresused three different models to run the same SSCE scenario in which sea-salt engineering was used in the low-latitude oceans to keep top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing at the 2020 level for 50 years and was then abruptly turned off for 20 years.
It is widely believed to be the first study to use multiple models to determine the effects of a specific geoengineering experiment — most past experiments simply assume radiative forcing has been reduced, and model the effects, rather than applying a specific experiment — and it had one noticeable unexpected result.
Many past studies have determined that geoengineering experiments, while keeping the planet cool, also can disrupt the Earth’s hydrological cycle to dangerous degrees (ClimateWire, Nov. 6). The SSCE study found that sea-salt engineering, while reducing precipitation over low-latitude oceans, also increased precipitation over low-latitude land regions.
Jón Egill Kristjánsson, a meteorologist at the University of Oslo and a co-author of the study, said he was surprised by that result.
“That’s distinctly different from the simpler simulations where you just turn down the solar constant, which has been done in many studies,” he said.
As the logic — and science — goes, a cooler, geoengineered planet means less evaporation, and thus less rainfall. But Kristjánsson said their result could be explained by a monsoon circulation that shifts to land when only ocean areas get cooled down.
“It’s an interesting result, and all three models agree on that [result],” he said.
“We try to simulate in a more physically realistic manner — to the extent one can use such a term at this stage,” he added. “Right now, it’s all science fiction.”
The Latest on: Feasible Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Feasible Geoengineering
- Surviving Climate Change Will Require Geoengineering, Scientists Say [UPDATED]on November 13, 2020 at 11:47 am
“I am generally against geoengineering because of its unintended side effects,” Randers said. “But if the world continues to delay meaningful and feasible action to phase out fossil ...
- Any hope of keeping Earth habitable now requires sucking carbon back out of the atmosphere, a new study foundon November 12, 2020 at 2:33 pm
"I am generally against geoengineering because of its unintended side effects. But if the world continues to delay meaningful and feasible action to phase out fossil fuels, we may have to resort ...
- Climate change: We're 60 years too late to stop global warming, sea level rises - studyon November 12, 2020 at 8:23 am
We're perhaps between 50 and 60 years too late to prevent catastrophic climate change simply by ceasing emissions, scientists say. Temperatures will continue to rise for a long time after we reach ...
- Has ‘geoengineering’ arrived in China?on November 11, 2020 at 7:41 pm
“Maybe geoengineering is something that might provide a role ... 10 to 15 years of international research to decide if even “quick” methods like SRM are feasible, or how they might be governed. “And ...
- Solar geoengineering rises in the East - China Dialogueon November 11, 2020 at 5:27 am
Solar geoengineering rises in the East China is cautiously engaging in one of the most important scientific debates of the century, writes Lili Pike en ...
- Ocean CO2 collector could fight global warming and ocean acidificationon November 6, 2020 at 6:00 pm
“The new geoengineering technique will not be able ... Electrochemical Acceleration of Chemical Weathering as an Energetically Feasible Approach to Mitigating Anthropogenic Climate Change.
- Scientists Consider Whether to Cause Global Coolingon October 18, 2020 at 5:00 pm
“Geoengineering doesn’t do that ... would be and whether moving to real experiments or full deployment will be feasible. “There are some experiments you never want to do,” he says.
- Can Geoengineering Fix the Climate Crisis?on September 27, 2020 at 9:50 pm
Even though these techniques sound feasible, geoengineering is still pretty controversial among scientists. Both methods could have very unpredictable and potentially irreversible results.
via Bing News