Majority wants both punishment for tax evaders and things to go fine for themselves
In most modern states, central institutions are funded by public taxation. This means, however, that tax evaders must also be punished. Once such a system has been established, it is also good for the community: it makes co-existence easier and it helps maintain common standards. However, such advantageous institutions do not come about by themselves. The community must first agree that such a common punishment authority makes sense and decide what powers it should be given. Climate protection is a case in point, demonstrating that this cannot always be achieved. But how can a community agree on sensible institutions and self-limitations?
The Max Planck researchers allowed participants in a modified public goods game to decide whether to pay taxes towards a policing institution with their starting capital. They were additionally able to pay money into a common pot. The total paid in was then tripled and paid out to all participants. If taxes had been paid beforehand, free riders who did not contribute to the group pot were punished by the police. In the absence of taxation, however, there would be no police and the group would run the risk that no-one would pay into the common pot.
Police punishment of both free riders and tax evaders quickly established cooperative behaviour in the experiment. If, however, tax evaders were not punished, the opposite happened and the participants avoided paying taxes. Without policing, there was no longer any incentive to pay into the group pot, so reducing the profits for the group members. Ultimately, each individual thus benefits if tax evaders are punished.
But can participants foresee this development? To find out, the scientists gave the participants a choice: they were now able to choose individually whether they joined a group in which the police also punish tax evaders. Alternatively, they could choose a group in which only those participants who did not pay into the common pot were penalised. Faced with this choice, the majority preferred a community without punishment for tax evaders – with the result that virtually no taxes were paid and, subsequently, that contributions to the group pot also fell.
In a second experimental scenario, the players were instead able to decide by democratic vote whether, for all subsequent rounds, the police should be authorised to punish tax evaders as well as free riders or only free riders. In this case, the players clearly voted for institutions in which tax evaders were also punished. “People are often prepared to impose rules on themselves, but only if they know that these rules apply to everyone,” summarises Christian Hilbe, the lead author of the study. A majority decision ensures that all participants are equally affected by the outcome of the vote. This makes it easier to introduce rules and institutions which, while demanding individual sacrifice, are best for the group.
The Latest on: Democracy
via Google News
The Latest on: Democracy
- Thai pro-democracy protesters warn of possible coupon November 27, 2020 at 11:51 am
Pro-democracy demonstrators in Thailand, undeterred by arrest warrants and the possibility of violent attacks, are staging another rally, poking fun at their critics and warning of the possibility of ...
- Republicans’ silence is complicity with Trump’s lying attacks on American democracyon November 27, 2020 at 4:00 am
All of us, liberals and conservatives, should loudly condemn those who have enabled Trump’s false claims by their words and by their silence.” | OPINION ...
- ‘Democracy Should Not Be Taken for Granted’on November 27, 2020 at 3:11 am
America has shown the world that democracy should not be taken for granted, that it requires our willingness to participate constantly in order to make sure it actually represents “The People.” As for ...
- Let's give thanks to Republican defenders of Democracyon November 26, 2020 at 8:30 am
We should thank those few Republicans who withstood pressure and personal attacks to protect the norms and laws of our political system.
- Republicans are right: democracy is rigged. But they are the beneficiarieson November 26, 2020 at 6:00 am
Conservatives relish the irony of Trump’s audacious reversal of the truth around rigging – because it distracts attention from their minority rule ...
- Column: Our democracy is fighting a bad case of ‘truth decay’on November 25, 2020 at 6:13 pm
To rebuild public trust, public officials and concerned media need to raise awareness of “truth decay” and work to close the information gaps that leave some Americans feeling like their lives and ...
- Give thanks for frontline workers who keep our loved ones, society, and democracy alive | Editorialon November 25, 2020 at 2:15 pm
Even as we recognize the pain and despair of this moment, we are grateful for many things — and for many people.
- Trump's coup failed – but US democracy has been given a scareon November 25, 2020 at 2:07 pm
The president pulled every lever to stay in power. It didn’t work, but how would the US handle a closer election?
- This tragic year, give thanks to those who safeguard our health and democracyon November 25, 2020 at 1:52 pm
IN THIS tragic year marked by death, disease, cowardice and dishonesty, we can still give thanks — perhaps even more heartfelt than in better times — for those who have worked so hard and given so ...
- The U.S. must show solidarity with those fighting for democracy in Belaruson November 25, 2020 at 1:48 pm
FOR NEARLY 16 weeks, the streets of Belarus have been testament to the sacrifice of its citizens and their determination to recover their stolen election. Thousands have been detained. Many have been ...
via Bing News