Revisions to Fisheries Act were unscientific, biologists at universities of Calgary and Dalhousie say
Federal government changes to Canada’s fisheries legislation have eviscerated the ability to protect habitat for most of the country’s fish species, scientists at the universities of Calgary and Dalhousie say in a new study.
The changes were politically motivated, unsupported by scientific advice – contrary to government policy – and are inconsistent with ecosystem-based management, fisheries biologists John Post and Jeffrey Hutchings say.
Their comprehensive assessment, in a peer-reviewed paper titled “Gutting Canada’s Fisheries Act: No fishery, no fish habitat protection,” is published in Fisheries, a journal of the 10,000-member American Fisheries Society.
“The biggest change is that habitat protection has been removed for all species other than those that have direct economic or cultural interests, through recreational, commercial and Aboriginal fisheries,” says Post, professor of biological sciences at the University of Calgary.
Habitat protection curtailed
Before, “there used to be a blanket habitat protection for all fish species,” he says. “Now there’s a protection just for species of economic importance which, from an ecological standpoint, makes no sense.”
Studies cited by Post and Hutchings show that not protecting habitat is the “single greatest factor” for the decline and loss of commercial and non-commercial species on land and in water.
Yet the changes to the Fisheries Act removed the “mandated legal protection” of habitat even for fish species that are in decline, Post says.
About three-quarters of approximately 80 freshwater fish species in Canada listed as being at risk, threatened or endangered “are not going to receive the protection that they did in the past,” Post says.
Hutchings is a former chair of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada while Post is a current member. Both scientists’ research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
A streamlined process for development projects
One reason the federal government gave for making the changes last year was to streamline environmental reviews and make the regulatory process more efficient for development projects.
But Post and Hutchings’ paper cites peer-reviewed scientific studies which found that between 2006 and 2011, only one project proposal among thousands was denied by the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Only 1.6 per cent of 1,238 convictions under the previous Fisheries Act between 2007 and 2011 pertained to the destruction of fish habitat.
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Group makes icy dive to install fish habitaton January 17, 2020 at 10:26 pm
HERSHEY, Neb. (AP) - Through 6 inches of ice into water that varies between 38 and 40 degrees, the Platte River Scuba Divers braved the cold to install fishing habitat at the Hershey Wildlife ...
- Habitat Restoration Planned For Lighthouse Beach Area In Evanstonon January 17, 2020 at 12:33 pm
Work will not expand onto the Harley Clarke Mansion manicured grounds. (View photos.) This habitat restoration work is essential to protecting and conserving this natural area, while also maintaining ...
- To Conserve Marine Species, Make Protected Areas Mobileon January 17, 2020 at 10:48 am
Today, marine protected areas are among the primary tools for conserving marine habitats and protecting threatened species. These are areas where fishing and other disturbances are supposed to be ...
- Who shot a federally protected bald eagle in Tacoma and left it to die?on January 17, 2020 at 4:20 am
An adult male bald eagle looks out from an animal carrier after it was captured at the Port of Tacoma’s Gog-le-hi-te wetland habitat site Jan. 10. The bird had been shot and ... “U.S. Fish and ...
- More than 100 Exeter homes and wildlife reserve to be protected from floodson January 16, 2020 at 3:55 pm
The repairs to the flood bank are required to protect the site from wave and tide flooding. Mr Bartram added: “The site is popular with bird watchers and considered to be the most important freshwater ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Conservationists Seek Wolverine Protectionon January 16, 2020 at 1:04 pm
There are fewer than 300 wolverines left in the lower 48 and they remain threatened by habitat loss and climate change. Today’s notice is the latest step in a 20-year effort to save the species, one ...
- Herrera Beutler calls bill critical to preserving salmon habitaton January 15, 2020 at 8:23 pm
The allocation to regional programs — part of the Mitchell Act, a 1938 law that helps guide protection and harvest of salmon from ... parties to take the next critical step: protect salmon habitat and ...
- Outrage over plan to bulldoze 'Bear Hill' koala habitat amid bushfire crisison January 15, 2020 at 5:29 pm
With so much koala habitat already destroyed, he believes key forests such as Mount Lofty in Toowoomba ... To avoid more extinctions, the government will need to massively ramp up protection and ...
- Sandy Bottom wetlands to receive protection for 'national ecological significance'on January 15, 2020 at 9:54 am
Plan to widen NC 191 spurred effort to enhance protections on the habitat, which is home to rare reptiles and amphibians, bats, birds and more.
- New study reveals international movements of Atlantic tarpon, need for protectionon January 14, 2020 at 12:25 am
They also found the fish use both freshwater and estuarine habitat throughout their life and identified several previously unknown spawning locations in Florida and the Gulf of Mexico. "Our findings ...