Revisions to Fisheries Act were unscientific, biologists at universities of Calgary and Dalhousie say
Federal government changes to Canada’s fisheries legislation have eviscerated the ability to protect habitat for most of the country’s fish species, scientists at the universities of Calgary and Dalhousie say in a new study.
The changes were politically motivated, unsupported by scientific advice – contrary to government policy – and are inconsistent with ecosystem-based management, fisheries biologists John Post and Jeffrey Hutchings say.
Their comprehensive assessment, in a peer-reviewed paper titled “Gutting Canada’s Fisheries Act: No fishery, no fish habitat protection,” is published in Fisheries, a journal of the 10,000-member American Fisheries Society.
“The biggest change is that habitat protection has been removed for all species other than those that have direct economic or cultural interests, through recreational, commercial and Aboriginal fisheries,” says Post, professor of biological sciences at the University of Calgary.
Habitat protection curtailed
Before, “there used to be a blanket habitat protection for all fish species,” he says. “Now there’s a protection just for species of economic importance which, from an ecological standpoint, makes no sense.”
Studies cited by Post and Hutchings show that not protecting habitat is the “single greatest factor” for the decline and loss of commercial and non-commercial species on land and in water.
Yet the changes to the Fisheries Act removed the “mandated legal protection” of habitat even for fish species that are in decline, Post says.
About three-quarters of approximately 80 freshwater fish species in Canada listed as being at risk, threatened or endangered “are not going to receive the protection that they did in the past,” Post says.
Hutchings is a former chair of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada while Post is a current member. Both scientists’ research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
A streamlined process for development projects
One reason the federal government gave for making the changes last year was to streamline environmental reviews and make the regulatory process more efficient for development projects.
But Post and Hutchings’ paper cites peer-reviewed scientific studies which found that between 2006 and 2011, only one project proposal among thousands was denied by the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Only 1.6 per cent of 1,238 convictions under the previous Fisheries Act between 2007 and 2011 pertained to the destruction of fish habitat.
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Yellowstone grizzlies being killed to protect Wyoming cowson May 13, 2020 at 10:30 am
There are tens of millions of cows in the U.S. but only about 700 grizzly bears in the remote and wild public lands known as the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem that ...
- Legislation Introduced to Protect NM's Gila, San Francisco Riverson May 13, 2020 at 12:07 am
Many Americans have been drawn to nature during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the significance of a bill introduced in Congress to protect two of New Mexico's rivers. The Greater Gila Wild and ...
- Udall, Heinrich introduce bill to protect Gila Riveron May 12, 2020 at 9:18 pm
The “M.H. ‘Dutch’ Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic River Act” is named in memory of the longtime Gila River conservation advocate. “We worked closely with community members, private landowners, ...
- How do you prevent viral outbreaks? By protecting animal healthon May 12, 2020 at 7:32 am
Ebola and Q fever have jumped from animals to humans. But it is not only because of these diseases that we should include animals in our health policy, but also because of their right to health, ...
- Working With the Environment to Protect People: UNEP’s COVID-19 Responseon May 11, 2020 at 11:37 pm
English Analysis on World about Climate Change and Environment, Health, Epidemic and more; published on 12 May 2020 by UNEP ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Mars shock: NASA could use Red Planet's LAVA TUBES for human habitaton May 13, 2020 at 7:07 am
MARS explorers could exploit the Red Planet's subterranean lava tubes to shelter from brutal space radiation, a NASA report has revealed.
- Outrage as koala habitat flattened for housing developmenton May 12, 2020 at 9:30 pm
A Noosa development is jeopardising the safety of a local koala community, according to wildlife protection group.
- Humane Society International Welcomes $150 Million Funding For Wildlife & Habitat Bushfire Recoveryon May 11, 2020 at 11:10 pm
HSI welcomes the additional $150 million in funding for wildlife and habitat bushfire recovery the Prime Minister announced yesterday. Federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley has set out the details ...
- West Marin nonprofit buys site for salmon habitaton May 9, 2020 at 5:49 pm
It probably has one of the longest creekside habitats on a single-family home anywhere in the San Geronimo Valley,” said Todd Steiner, executive director of the organization and its Salmon Protection ...
- Zoom gloom? Habitat ReStore can get you goatson May 7, 2020 at 9:49 pm
LA CROSSE, Wis. — If Zoom meetings are getting your goat because of glitches or, for instance, a flushing toilet in the background, here’s the perfect way to become a hero. Habitat for Humanity of the ...