Revisions to Fisheries Act were unscientific, biologists at universities of Calgary and Dalhousie say
Federal government changes to Canada’s fisheries legislation have eviscerated the ability to protect habitat for most of the country’s fish species, scientists at the universities of Calgary and Dalhousie say in a new study.
The changes were politically motivated, unsupported by scientific advice – contrary to government policy – and are inconsistent with ecosystem-based management, fisheries biologists John Post and Jeffrey Hutchings say.
Their comprehensive assessment, in a peer-reviewed paper titled “Gutting Canada’s Fisheries Act: No fishery, no fish habitat protection,” is published in Fisheries, a journal of the 10,000-member American Fisheries Society.
“The biggest change is that habitat protection has been removed for all species other than those that have direct economic or cultural interests, through recreational, commercial and Aboriginal fisheries,” says Post, professor of biological sciences at the University of Calgary.
Habitat protection curtailed
Before, “there used to be a blanket habitat protection for all fish species,” he says. “Now there’s a protection just for species of economic importance which, from an ecological standpoint, makes no sense.”
Studies cited by Post and Hutchings show that not protecting habitat is the “single greatest factor” for the decline and loss of commercial and non-commercial species on land and in water.
Yet the changes to the Fisheries Act removed the “mandated legal protection” of habitat even for fish species that are in decline, Post says.
About three-quarters of approximately 80 freshwater fish species in Canada listed as being at risk, threatened or endangered “are not going to receive the protection that they did in the past,” Post says.
Hutchings is a former chair of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada while Post is a current member. Both scientists’ research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
A streamlined process for development projects
One reason the federal government gave for making the changes last year was to streamline environmental reviews and make the regulatory process more efficient for development projects.
But Post and Hutchings’ paper cites peer-reviewed scientific studies which found that between 2006 and 2011, only one project proposal among thousands was denied by the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Only 1.6 per cent of 1,238 convictions under the previous Fisheries Act between 2007 and 2011 pertained to the destruction of fish habitat.
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Bolivia and Paraguay unite to protect critically endangered guanacoson February 26, 2020 at 7:00 pm
While the species as a whole is not considered threatened with extinction, low numbers in Bolivia and Paraguay and continued declines there as its habitat is razed for agriculture cloud its future in ...
- Enviros, Feds Reach Agreement On Hawaii Habitat Deadlineson February 26, 2020 at 5:29 pm
In some instances, the government can extend its critical habitat designation decision by a year after it moves to protect a species, according to the lawsuit. But the environmental group said that ...
- Marin County Purchase Of Bucks Landing Adds Protected Landon February 26, 2020 at 5:07 pm
"Protection and preservation of tidal marshes and wetlands like these on San Pablo Bay are so important," one official said.
- Land set aside for yellow-billed cuckoo habitaton February 26, 2020 at 4:16 pm
U.S. Fish and Wildlife is looking to designate nearly 500,000 acres as critical habitat for a threatened bird, some of it in New Mexico. The yellow-bill cuckoo is a migratory bird that breeds along ...
- County Purchase Of Bucks Landing Adds Protected Land Along San Pablo Bayon February 26, 2020 at 4:09 pm
Its location south of Gallinas Creek will ensure public access to the Bay, county officials said. "Protection and preservation of tidal marshes and wetlands like these on San Pablo Bay are so ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Legal Victory Secures Habitat Protection for Two Central Texas Salamanderson February 26, 2020 at 12:27 pm
Habitat loss and degradation from urban sprawl are pushing these species toward ... The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 1.7 million ...
- Nearly 500,000 Acres Proposed as Protected Habitat for Western Cuckooon February 26, 2020 at 12:04 pm
The new proposal also identifies 145,000 acres as being considered for exclusion from protection when critical habitat is finalized. Among others, today’s proposal includes stretches of the Sacramento ...
- Rare snake wins protection in Mississippi, Alabama under critical habitat lawsuiton February 26, 2020 at 7:44 am
As a result of the lawsuit, 325,679 acres of critical habitat in Mississippi and Alabama will be protected for the rare black pinesnake.
- Rare snake wins protection under critical habitat lawsuiton February 26, 2020 at 12:00 am
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — A rare snake has won protection in two states under a critical habitat lawsuit filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Tuesday. As a ...
- Erie Marsh to benefit from habitat investmenton February 25, 2020 at 10:10 am
The southern-most jewel of habitat is the Erie Marsh located off E ... The majority of grant funding comes from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative.