A Case Western Reserve University professor wondered why some types of research were more apt to secure federal grants, while others—especially exploratory science—often didn’t.
Using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a case study, Assistant Philosophy Professor Chris Haufe concluded that hypothesis-based research has the edge over discovery research for several reasons that he explains in a new paper.
Haufe discusses the NIH’s peer-reviewed grant process in his Studies in History and Philosophy of Science journal article, “Why do funding agencies favor hypothesis testing?”
Hypothesis-driven research is based on scientific theories, while exploration is based on a search for discovery backed by few theories or none at all.
While looking into the types of research most often funded, Haufe shows that instructions to reviewers and applicants strongly favor hypothesis-based inquiries that are related to and relevant to current science issues.
For example, Haufe reports that the NIH guidelines for RO1 grants (described by the NIH as investigator-initiated or a response to a program announcement or request for application) to researchers advise applicants, “A strong grant application is driven by a strong, solid hypothesis with clear research objectives. The specific aims are a formal statement of objectives and milestones of the research project towards testing the hypothesis.”
The article offers two explanations why the NIH prefers hypothesis testing: The research is driven by best practices (how to do and test science), and it’s easy for peer reviewers to separate good from bad science based on the research methods.
Those with a realistic chance to prove what they set out to find and have the biggest impact for the public’s benefit tend to receive the federal research dollars, Haufe concludes.
With hypothesis testing, researchers present what the study hopes to accomplish, how it will be done and possible outcomes. Many researchers also conduct pilot studies or draw from findings by other researchers to build a strong case for future success.
Exploratory research, however, is driven more by hope and chance of discovery, Haufe writes.
Funding success also tends to take the path of least risk, Haufe explains.
Hypothesis testing takes the next step in scientific theory, having already stood the rigors of examination. Meanwhile, exploratory research examines unknown areas with no or little-known theories to back them—perceived as a riskier bet.
Haufe said the federal government, with limited funding, wants to support research where there’s a chance of success that serves both public and science interests. The closer the research is to what’s already known also improves chances of funding, he reports.
The science community has long accepted hypothesis testing.
The Latest on: Exploratory funding
- Ecosurety launches £1 million Exploration Fundon December 2, 2019 at 12:19 am
The Ecosurety Exploration Fund, is the first ever such fund to be launched by a UK compliance scheme and will build on Ecosurety’s experience in supporting innovative projects and new technologies ...
- Exploration spend up in Sept quarteron December 1, 2019 at 11:41 pm
“It has been a challenging investment environment for mineral exploration companies, however, the statistics show that companies are finding ways to continue funding exploration programmes, and ...
- Earth observation, deep space exploration big winners in new ESA budgeton November 30, 2019 at 10:02 pm
contribute to NASA-led lunar exploration efforts, and continue ESA’s participation in the International Space Station until 2030. The funding approved Thursday at the conclusion of a two-day meeting ...
- European Space Agency Gets More Funding For Future Space Explorationon November 29, 2019 at 1:25 pm
"Fueling Discovery" is a joint effort of the UW-Madison College of Letters & Science and the Wisconsin State Journal. No taxpayer dollars were used to create the section. The effort was financed ...
- Europe gets a $15.9 billion funding boost for its space exploration planson November 28, 2019 at 9:42 am
(CNN) — The European Space Agency has received a 14.4 billion-euro ($15.9 billion) funding boost from its 22 member states as it seeks to launch new missions and safeguard its role in space ...
- Outcrop Gold and Funding Partner Newmont Goldcorp to Resume Exploring the Buritica Trend on Lyra Projecton November 27, 2019 at 4:03 pm
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - November 27, 2019) - Outcrop Gold Corp. (TSXV: OCG) ("Outcrop" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that the Company and its funding partner Newmont ...
- Nicola Sturgeon to fight for a multi-billion-pound increase in UK NHS fundingon November 26, 2019 at 11:08 pm
Ms Sturgeon will say: “Despite Tory cuts, since 2010 we’ve increased frontline health funding by 13% in real terms ... Scottish oil and gas exploration firm Cairn Energy has announced today that it ...
- Pelangio Exploration Signs Term Sheet to Acquire Abansuaso Property Adjacent to Its Manfo Projecton November 26, 2019 at 5:18 am
November 26, 2019 (ACCESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- TORONTO, ON / ACCESSWIRE / November 26, 2019 / Pelangio Exploration Inc. (PX)(otcpink ... Pelangio would incur initial expenditures of US$2.5 million and ...
- Outcrop Gold Appoints Vice President of Explorationon November 25, 2019 at 4:09 pm
Outcrop performs its own grass roots exploration and then employs a joint venture business model on its projects to maximize investor exposure to discovery and minimize financial risk. Outcrop has ...
- Sarama Resources Ltd.: Sarama Resources Commences Drilling at the Prospective Bamako 2 Exploration Property in South-West Burkina Fasoon November 25, 2019 at 4:32 am
Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the Company's ability to carry on its exploration activities, the sufficiency of funding, the timely receipt of required approvals, the price ...
via Google News and Bing News