New University of Minnesota research shows reallocating croplands away from fuels and animal feed could boost food available for people by 70 percent without clearing more land.
The world’s croplands could feed 4 billion more people than they do now just by shifting from producing animal feed and biofuels to producing exclusively food for human consumption, according to new research from the Institute on the Environment at the University of Minnesota.
Even a smaller, partial shift from crop-intensive livestock such as feedlot beef to food animals such as chicken or pork could increase agricultural efficiency and provide food for millions, the study says.
“We essentially have uncovered an astoundingly abundant supply of food for a hungry world, hidden in plain sight in the farmlands we already cultivate,” says graduate research assistant Emily Cassidy, lead author of the paper published in Environmental Research Letters.“Depending on the extent to which farmers and consumers are willing to change current practices, existing croplands could feed millions or even billions more people.”
Demand for crops is expected to double by 2050 as population grows and increasing affluence boosts meat consumption. Meat takes a particularly big toll on food security because it takes up to 30 crop calories to produce a single calorie of meat. In addition, crops are increasingly being used for biofuels rather than food production. This study sought to quantify the benefit to food security that would accrue if some or all of the lands used to produce animal feed and fuel were reallocated to directly produce food for people.
To get at that question, Cassidy and colleagues first mapped the extent and productivity of 41 major crops between 1997 and 2003, adjusting numbers for imports and exports and calculating conversion efficiencies of animal feed using U.S. Department of Agriculture data. The researchers assumed humans need an average of 2,700 calories per day, and grazing lands and animals were not included in the study. Among the team’s findings:
- Only 12 percent of crop calories used for animal feed end up as calories consumed by humans.
- Only 55 percent of crop calories worldwide directly nourish people.
- Growing food exclusively for direct human consumption could boost available food calories up to 70 percent
- U.S. agriculture alone could feed an additional 1 billion people by shifting crop calories to direct human consumption.
- When calculated on the basis of protein rather than calories, results were similar. For instance, of all plant protein produced, 49 percent ends up in human diets.
The Latest on: Cropland
- Local groups critical of new EPA water rule on December 17, 2018 at 4:05 am
Last week the EPA reversed what it had argued in a 2015 ruling under the Obama administration, with the agency now claiming it has no authority to regulate groundwater, ditches, converted cropland, st... […]
- Geese in the mud on December 15, 2018 at 11:12 pm
But it’s so wet right now that I spent 20 minutes the other day with the farmer who farms all the land around our deer blind figuring out where a four-wheeler can be driven on his cropland to retrieve ... […]
- How to report solar panels constructed on cropland on December 15, 2018 at 7:10 am
Producers who have solar panels constructed on their farms should notify the local Farm Service Agency office. Any area that is no longer considered suitable as cropland (producing annual or perennial ... […]
- DNR to enroll state-owned cropland in water quality effort on December 14, 2018 at 6:36 am
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has committed to pursuing certification of 15,000 acres of croplands it owns and manages as part of a statewide effort to protect water quality. The effor... […]
- Halting desertification in the Sahel with solar power on December 14, 2018 at 3:53 am
Nonetheless, a return to planting and preserving trees rather than cutting them down is crucial as the satellite greening often means growth in unsustainable cropland rather than trees and vegetation ... […]
- Governments, researchers underestimate impact of inefficient land-use on climate change on December 13, 2018 at 6:27 am
They provide a "carbon benefits index" for calculating whether efforts to combat climate change are helped or hurt by switching agricultural production from corn to soybeans to tropical fruits, or fro... […]
- RELEASE: New Study in Nature finds governments and researchers have been underestimating the significance of land and diets to reduce climate change on December 12, 2018 at 5:22 pm
PRINCETON, N.J.— When land shifts from producing corn to soybeans to kumquats, or from cropland to grazing land or bioenergy, or back to forest, does that help or hurt the world’s potential to mitigat... […]
- Growing climatic sensitivity of U.S. agriculture linked to technological change and regional specialization on December 12, 2018 at 11:26 am
We aggregate detailed 4-km gridded weather data to the state level based on 30-m cropland weights (fig. S1). We conduct the statistical analysis by USDA Climate Hub Region (fig. S2) in the lower 48 st... […]
- Bioenergy crops could be as bad for biodiversity as climate change on December 12, 2018 at 11:20 am
The authors argue there is an urgent need to carefully consider biodiversity when expanding bioenergy cropland, for example growing oil palm, maize and rapeseed. Familiar species that would be ... […]
- Bioenergy cropland expansion could be as bad for biodiversity as climate change on December 10, 2018 at 11:00 am
Frankfurt am Main, 12/07/2018. Nature is one of the beneficiaries of climate protection measures, among which bioenergy has long been touted as a potential savior. However, to reach the 1.5 degree ... […]
via Google News and Bing News