Since 1955, The Journal of Irreproducible Results has offered “spoofs, parodies, whimsies, burlesques, lampoons and satires” about life in the laboratory.
Among its greatest hits: “Acoustic Oscillations in Jell-O, With and Without Fruit, Subjected to Varying Levels of Stress” and “Utilizing Infinite Loops to Compute an Approximate Value of Infinity.” The good-natured jibes are a backhanded celebration of science. What really goes on in the lab is, by implication, of a loftier, more serious nature.
It has been jarring to learn in recent years that a reproducible result may actually be the rarest of birds. Replication, the ability of another lab to reproduce a finding, is the gold standard of science, reassurance that you have discovered something true. But that is getting harder all the time. With the most accessible truths already discovered, what remains are often subtle effects, some so delicate that they can be conjured up only under ideal circumstances, using highly specialized techniques.
Fears that this is resulting in some questionable findings began to emerge in 2005, when Dr. John P. A. Ioannidis, a kind of meta-scientist who researches research, wrote a paper pointedly titled “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.”
Given the desire for ambitious scientists to break from the pack with a striking new finding, Dr. Ioannidis reasoned, many hypotheses already start with a high chance of being wrong. Otherwise proving them right would not be so difficult and surprising — and supportive of a scientist’s career. Taking into account the human tendency to see what we want to see, unconscious bias is inevitable. Without any ill intent, a scientist may be nudged toward interpreting the data so it supports the hypothesis, even if just barely.
The effect is amplified by competition for a shrinking pool of grant money and also by the design of so many experiments — with small sample sizes (cells in a lab dish or people in an epidemiological pool) and weak standards for what passes as statistically significant. That makes it all the easier to fool oneself.
Paradoxically the hottest fields, with the most people pursuing the same questions, are most prone to error, Dr. Ioannidis argued. If one of five competing labs is alone in finding an effect, that result is the one likely to be published. But there is a four in five chance that it is wrong. Papers reporting negative conclusions are more easily ignored.
Putting all of this together, Dr. Ioannidis devised a mathematical model supporting the conclusion that most published findings are probably incorrect.
The Latest on: Research results
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Research results” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Research results
- V Foundation’s Sonoma Epicurean Raised 3.4 Million For Cancer Researchon April 19, 2024 at 8:00 am
Sonoma Epicurean is not just any fundraiser; it's a testament to the collective power of humanity and the hope it holds for a future free from the clutches of this deadly disease.
- Future quantum computers could use bizarre 'error-free' qubit design built on forgotten research from the 1990son April 19, 2024 at 3:00 am
Qubits can be made by floating a suspended electron over a pool of liquid helium rather than being embedded them a solid-state crystal — which leads to impurities and errors.
- Why Do People Hate Inflation? New Research Uncovers Key Attitudeson April 18, 2024 at 12:51 pm
Despite an otherwise robust recovery, inflation still ranks high on everyone’s list of economic concerns, and because of this, Americans overwhelmingly rank ...
- Lam Research: Benefiting From HBM-Driven DRAM; Initiate With 'Strong Buy'on April 18, 2024 at 12:46 pm
Lam Research is well-positioned to benefit from the growth in HBM products and strong future revenue growth. Learn why I rate LRCX stock a strong buy.
- Google consolidates its DeepMind and Research teams amid AI pushon April 18, 2024 at 11:27 am
Alphabet-owned Google said on Thursday it would consolidate teams that focus on building artificial intelligence models across its Research and DeepMind divisions in its latest push to develop its AI ...
- Bitcoin Halving Is Not a Bullish Event, Says 10x Research Analyston April 18, 2024 at 11:15 am
Bearish signals are looming over the crypto market these days and will almost certainly push prices down in the short term, well-known research analyst Markus Thielen said.
- Demystifying Lam Research: Insights From 21 Analyst Reviewson April 18, 2024 at 8:13 am
Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $955.19, a high estimate of $1200.00, and a low estimate of $825.00. Marking an ...
- Research: Boards Still Have an ESG Expertise Gap — But They’re Improvingon April 18, 2024 at 5:05 am
The role of U.S. public boards in managing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues has significantly evolved over the past five years. Initially, boards were largely unprepared to handle ...
- Is Lam Research Stock Going to $1,050? 1 Wall Street Analyst Thinks So.on April 18, 2024 at 1:20 am
The stock of semiconductor equipment maker Lam Research ( LRCX -2.56%) has done very well of late (it's up 87% over the past year), yet one pundit tracking the company believes it can go even higher.
- FSU Panama City to host annual Preview Day and Research Symposium for students on Fridayon April 17, 2024 at 11:49 am
In the Research Symposium, students present their work to a university panel. Preview Day is for prospective students to learn about FSU.
via Bing News