During a traditional lineup, eyewitnesses are either shown six photographs of individuals at the same time (simultaneous lineup) or presented one picture at a time (sequential lineup). The paired comparison (PAR) method asks the eyewitness to choose the picture that is more similar to the culprit when shown two photographs at the same time. A technique called signal detection analysis is then used to reveal the structure of the witness’s recognition memory and eliminate unconscious bias.
Credit: Gepshtein et al., Nature Communications
Salk scientists devise a new lineup method to help eyewitnesses more accurately identify suspects
People wrongfully accused of a crime often wait years—if ever—to be exonerated. Many of these wrongfully accused cases stem from unreliable eyewitness testimony. Now, Salk scientists have identified a new way of presenting a lineup to an eyewitness that could improve the likelihood that the correct suspect is identified and reduce the number of innocent people sentenced to jail. Their report is published in Nature Communications on July 14, 2020.
“Misidentification by eyewitnesses is a long-standing problem in our society. Our new lineup method uncovers the structure of eyewitness memory, removes decision bias from the identification process, and quantifies performance of individual witnesses,” says Salk Professor Thomas D. Albright, co-corresponding author of the study. “This study is a great example of using laboratory science to bring about criminal justice reform.”
In the United States, nearly 70 percent of DNA exonerations are due to misidentifications by eyewitnesses, according to the Innocence Project. To overcome this societal problem, research has focused on factors that influence the likelihood that a witness will identify the correct person. One key factor is the way individuals are presented to the eyewitness during the lineup, according to Albright, who co-chaired a National Academy of Sciences committee to examine the validity of eyewitness identification. Albright, an expert in the fields of visual perception and recognition, taps into decades of research suggesting that people commonly misperceive visual events, and memories of those events are continuously augmented and deteriorate over time.
Currently, the two most common (or traditional) methods used by law enforcement are known as simultaneous and sequential lineups. In the simultaneous method the eyewitness views six photographs of individuals at the same time; in the sequential method the eyewitness views six photos, one at a time. The witness then either identifies a suspect or rejects the lineup if no face matches their memory of the crime scene.
The research team sought to create a new lineup method that would help estimate the strengths of memories for each face and eliminate unconscious biases that shape decisions without awareness.
“Traditional lineups just reveal the top choice—the tip of the iceberg. But the cause of the witness’s decision is ambiguous. It may reflect strong memory for the culprit, or it may mean that the witness was not very discerning,” says Albright. “Our new procedure overcomes that ambiguity by revealing the strength of recognition memory for all lineup faces.”
The scientists used a technique, called the method of paired comparisons, which works similar to how an optometrist gives an eye exam: Just like looking through pairs of lenses and stating which lens is clearer, the eyewitness is shown two photographs of individuals at a time and they choose the one that looks more similar to the person they remember from the crime scene. The procedure yields an estimate of the strength of recognition memory for each lineup face. Statistical analysis of these memory strengths then reveals the probability of correctly identifying the culprit.
“Our methods derive from a branch of science called sensory psychophysics,” says Staff Scientist Sergei Gepshtein, first and co-corresponding author of the paper, who founded and directs the Collaboratory for Adaptive Sensory Technologies at Salk. “Psychophysical tools are designed to reveal how properties of the physical world are ordered—or ‘scaled’—in the mind. Our approach allowed us to peek into the ‘black box’ and measure how lineup faces are organized in the witness’s memory in terms of their similarity to the culprit.”
The paired comparison method yields greater information about the identity of the culprit than previous methods. What is more, it offers an unprecedented quantitative index of certainty for individual eyewitnesses, which is what the judge and jury really need to know.
“The conduct of a lineup is just one application of our method,” says Gepshtein. “Another application is selection of lineup ‘fillers,’ which are faces of people known to be innocent. The fillers should not be too similar or too dissimilar to the suspect. Because the new method reveals the perceived similarity of faces, it can be used to optimize the choice of lineup fillers.”
The paired comparison lineup holds much promise as a research tool as well as a practical tool for investigation and prosecution of crimes. The authors hope that the new technique will soon be applied in real police casework, leading to more correct identifications and fewer wrongful convictions.
“Convictions should be based on science, not precedent,” says Albright.
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Keeping innocent people out of jail
- Even Though They Are Free, Harlem Park Three Struggle To Adjust To Life After Prisonon October 6, 2020 at 6:43 pm
After 36 years wrongly imprisoned, the Harlem Park Three are struggling to adjust to life, connect with their family and feel like they lost so much of their life.
- Exonerated Harlem Park Three recall their 1983 murder arrests, say more innocent people are ‘wasting away’ in prisonon October 6, 2020 at 5:18 pm
You might remember the celebrated release of the Harlem Park Three last year. Now grown men, in 1983 at age 16, they were wrongfully convicted of murder. Their release was a victory thanks to the ...
- Los Angeles Man Exonerated After 7 Years in Prison for Robbery He Did Not Commiton October 6, 2020 at 5:07 pm
Derrick Harris was released on Tuesday after his co-defendant signed a declaration that Harris was not part of the robbery ...
- Boise State forensics lab helps free an innocent man after he spent 26 years in prison for a crime he didn't commiton October 6, 2020 at 9:16 am
Lucino Hamilton was convicted of killing his foster mom in 1995, and after spending 26 years in a Michigan prison for the crime he didn't commit, Hamilton is now a free man.
- In Their Own Words: Exonerated Harlem Park Three Recall Their 1983 Murder Arrests, Say More Innocent People Are ‘Wasting Away’ In Prisonon October 5, 2020 at 8:24 pm
In an exclusive interview, the Harlem Park Three share what it was like to be wrongfully convicted and the freed more than 30 years later.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Keeping innocent people out of jail
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Science of perception
- Girls' Interest in Computer Science Still a Challengeon October 6, 2020 at 1:13 am
A new Google/Gallup report shows boys in grades seven to 12 are nearly three times as likely as girls to say they may pursue a career in computer science.
- India ranks 4th in global survey assessing public perception of government response to Covid-19on October 5, 2020 at 11:31 pm
Around 13,400 people were surveyed across 19 countries in June, whose findings have come out in PLOS ONE, a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science ...
- The challenges of following the scienceon October 5, 2020 at 5:23 pm
Listen to the science,” the pundits and smart people on television say. I wonder if they know what that means.
- COVID-score: A tool to evaluate public perception of countries' response to the pandemicon October 5, 2020 at 11:02 am
The Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), a center supported by the "la Caixa" Foundation, in coordination with the City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health & Health ...
- Exploring prediction errors that can influence human perceptions of time.on October 5, 2020 at 10:30 am
Researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel have recently carried out a fascinating study exploring if and how prediction errors can bias how ...