Photo credit: Denys Nevozhai
There’s a fairly large flaw in the way that programmers are currently addressing ethical concerns related to artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous vehicles (AVs). Namely, existing approaches don’t account for the fact that people might try to use the AVs to do something bad.
For example, let’s say that there is an autonomous vehicle with no passengers and it is about to crash into a car containing five people. It can avoid the collision by swerving out of the road, but it would then hit a pedestrian.
Most discussions of ethics in this scenario focus on whether the autonomous vehicle’s AI should be selfish (protecting the vehicle and its cargo) or utilitarian (choosing the action that harms the fewest people). But that either/or approach to ethics can raise problems of its own.
“Current approaches to ethics and autonomous vehicles are a dangerous oversimplification – moral judgment is more complex than that,” says Veljko Dubljevi?, an assistant professor in the Science, Technology & Society (STS) program at North Carolina State University and author of a paper outlining this problem and a possible path forward. “For example, what if the five people in the car are terrorists? And what if they are deliberately taking advantage of the AI’s programming to kill the nearby pedestrian or hurt other people? Then you might want the autonomous vehicle to hit the car with five passengers.
“In other words, the simplistic approach currently being used to address ethical considerations in AI and autonomous vehicles doesn’t account for malicious intent. And it should.”
As an alternative, Dubljevi? proposes using the so-called Agent–Deed–Consequence (ADC) model as a framework that AIs could use to make moral judgments. The ADC model judges the morality of a decision based on three variables.
First, is the agent’s intent good or bad? Second, is the deed or action itself good or bad? Lastly, is the outcome or consequence good or bad? This approach allows for considerable nuance.
For example, most people would agree that running a red light is bad. But what if you run a red light in order to get out of the way of a speeding ambulance? And what if running the red light means that you avoided a collision with that ambulance?
“The ADC model would allow us to get closer to the flexibility and stability that we see in human moral judgment, but that does not yet exist in AI,” says Dubljevi?. “Here’s what I mean by stable and flexible. Human moral judgment is stable because most people would agree that lying is morally bad. But it’s flexible because most people would also agree that people who lied to Nazis in order to protect Jews were doing something morally good.
“But while the ADC model gives us a path forward, more research is needed,” Dubljevi? says. “I have led experimental work on how both philosophers and lay people approach moral judgment, and the results were valuable. However, that work gave people information in writing. More studies of human moral judgment are needed that rely on more immediate means of communication, such as virtual reality, if we want to confirm our earlier findings and implement them in AVs. Also, vigorous testing with driving simulation studies should be done before any putatively ‘ethical’ AVs start sharing the road with humans on a regular basis. Vehicle terror attacks have, unfortunately, become more common, and we need to be sure that AV technology will not be misused for nefarious purposes.”
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Artificial intelligence ethics
- Tamil Nadu to highlight initiatives in Artificial Intelligence at global summit in Delhion October 6, 2020 at 3:29 am
This comes after Union Minister for Communications and Information Technology Ravi Shankar Prasad appreciated TN for bringing out policies on ethical Artificial Intelligence and cybersecurity ...
- The biggest barrier to humane, ethical AI: Capitalism itselfon October 5, 2020 at 12:21 pm
Over the last several years, a growing chorus of academics, activists, and technologists have decried the ways in which artificial intelligence technology could engender bias, exacerbate inequity, and ...
- Data and artificial intelligence: new perspectives for customers and societyon October 5, 2020 at 4:04 am
The tremendous increase in the volume of data produced globally combined with the accelerated growth in capacity for processing this data – including artificial intelligence (AI) in particular – is ...
- RBC launches ethical AI hub for Canadian firmson October 4, 2020 at 4:24 pm
Royal Bank of Canada's artificial intelligence research unit has launched a programme to help promote "ethical AI".
- News Analysis: Italy, Europe betting on artificial intelligence to help drive post-coronavirus growth, say expertson October 3, 2020 at 3:03 pm
Hopes in Italy are high that artificial intelligence will play a major role in the country's post-coronavirus economic plans, according to analysts. And Italy is not the only country betting on that ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Artificial intelligence ethics
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Wasps Finance PLC - LAUNCH OF CONSENT SOLICITATIONon October 6, 2020 at 9:59 pm
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OR BENEFIT OF, U.S. PERSONS OR IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES OR ANY ...
- Roomba Vs Poop: Teaching Robots To Detect Pet Messon October 2, 2020 at 5:00 pm
At some point after the dog’s deed ... an agent of destruction, smearing a foul smelling mess throughout the space it was assigned to clean. Technology sometimes has unintended consequences.
- Only a Virtuous Person Can Live a Beautiful Lifeon September 24, 2020 at 2:54 pm
We cooperate with the grace given to us, or we do not, and the biggest consequence is what ... harmony with its source if the agent is virtuous. Even our best deeds are often mixed with selfish ...
- Home improvements?on September 20, 2020 at 5:01 pm
In April, real estate agents and consultants Knight Frank predicted ... around 15% of people surveyed were considering moving as a consequence of the lockdown. ‘As a result of Covid-19 many ...
- From Oedipus to coronavirus: Homo Sapiens and the making of scapegoatson September 7, 2020 at 10:08 am
Humanity assumes responsibility for its deeds and its destiny ... the inhabitants of Thebes that he alone will bear the consequences, that the whole city will be freed through this transfer.