A seemingly counterintuitive approach – converting one greenhouse gas into another – holds promise for returning the atmosphere to pre-industrial concentrations of methane, a powerful driver of global warming.
A relatively simple process could help turn the tide of climate change while also turning a healthy profit. That’s one of the hopeful visions outlined in a new Stanford-led paper that highlights a seemingly counterintuitive solution: converting one greenhouse gas into another.
The study, published in Nature Sustainability on May 20, describes a potential process for converting the extremely potent greenhouse gas methane into carbon dioxide, which is a much less potent driver of global warming. The idea of intentionally releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere may seem surprising, but the authors argue that swapping methane for carbon dioxide is a significant net benefit for the climate.
“If perfected, this technology could return the atmosphere to pre-industrial concentrations of methane and other gases,” said lead author Rob Jackson, the Michelle and Kevin Douglas Provostial Professor in Earth System Science in Stanford’s School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences.
The basic idea is that some sources of methane emissions – from rice cultivation or cattle, for example – may be very difficult or expensive to eliminate. “An alternative is to offset these emissions via methane removal, so there is no net effect on warming the atmosphere,” said study coauthor Chris Field, the Perry L. McCarty Director of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.
A problem and a possible solution
In 2018, methane – about 60 percent of which is generated by humans – reached atmospheric concentrations two and a half times greater than pre-industrial levels. Although the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is much greater, methane is 84 times more potent in terms of warming the climate system over the first 20 years after its release.
Most scenarios for stabilizing average global temperatures at 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels depend on strategies for both reducing the overall amount of carbon dioxide entering the atmosphere and removing what’s already in the atmosphere through approaches such as tree planting or underground sequestration. However, removing other greenhouse gases, particularly methane, could provide a complementary approach, according to the study’s authors, who point to the gas’s outsized influence on the climate.
Most scenarios for removing carbon dioxide typically assume hundreds of billions of tons removed over decades and do not restore the atmosphere to pre-industrial levels. In contrast, methane concentrations could be restored to pre-industrial levels by removing about 3.2 billion tons of the gas from the atmosphere and converting it into an amount of carbon dioxide equivalent to a few months of global industrial emissions, according to the researchers. If successful, the approach would eliminate approximately one-sixth of all causes of global warming to date.
Methane is challenging to capture from air because its concentration is so low. However, the authors point out that zeolite, a crystalline material that consists primarily of aluminum, silicon and oxygen, could act essentially as a sponge to soak up methane. “The porous molecular structure, relatively large surface area and ability to host copper and iron in zeolites make them promising catalysts for capturing methane and other gases,” said Ed Solomon, the Monroe E. Spaght Professor of Chemistry in the School of Humanities and Sciences.
The whole process might take the form of a giant contraption with electric fans forcing air through tumbling chambers or reactors full of powdered or pelletized zeolites and other catalysts. The trapped methane could then be heated to form and release carbon dioxide, the authors suggest.
A profitable future
The process of converting methane to carbon dioxide could be profitable with a price on carbon emissions or an appropriate policy. If market prices for carbon offsets rise to $500 or more per ton this century, as predicted by most relevant assessment models, each ton of methane removed from the atmosphere could be worth more than $12,000.
A zeolite array about the size of a football field could generate millions of dollars a year in income while removing harmful methane from the air. In principle, the researchers argue that the approach of converting a more harmful greenhouse gas to one that’s less potent could also apply to other greenhouse gases.
While reducing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to pre-industrial levels may seem unlikely in the near future, the researchers argue that it could be possible with strategies like these.
The Latest on: Climate change solution
via Google News
The Latest on: Climate change solution
- KPMG unveils blockchain solution to track climate emissionson October 7, 2020 at 10:11 pm
As organizations come under pressure to ramp up climate change policies, accounting giant KPMG has launched a new blockchain-based solution ...
- Utahns sign compact committing to pollution, climate change mitigationon October 7, 2020 at 5:11 pm
A mix of Utah leaders gathered virtually on Wednesday to sign the Utah Climate and Clean Air Compact, a new initiative that commits to a more sustainable future in the Beehive State.
- Prince William announces 'Earthshot' prize to spur climate innovationon October 7, 2020 at 4:34 pm
The Earthshot Prize will offer five 1 million-pound (nearly $1.3 million) awards each year for the next 10 years for projects that seek environmental solutions by 2030.
- Mark Ruffalo, Dia Mirza Join Global Initiative Aimed At Inspiring 1 Billion to Act On Climate Changeon October 7, 2020 at 11:56 am
There is an urgent need to move beyond the activist community and engage the non-activist middle to combat the threat posed by climate change. Extreme weather and rising sea levels from climate change ...
- The Democrats Have Quietly Given Up Their Old Myths About Climate Changeon October 7, 2020 at 11:00 am
The Democrats Have Quietly Given Up Their ... A year after President Donald Trump was elected, Robinson Meyer, a staff writer for the Atlantic, observed that, although Democrats had become the party ...
- Climate change could mean fewer sunny days for hot regions banking on solar poweron October 7, 2020 at 8:54 am
The first study to assess the day-to-day reliability of solar energy under climate change found that areas currently considered ideal for solar power production may be less viable in the future.
- For Gen Z, climate change is a clear and present danger to our planeton October 7, 2020 at 6:25 am
In America, climate change is often portrayed as a ticking time bomb of far-off devastation through videos of dying polar bears, melting ice caps and rising flood waters. Rarely do we confront the ...
- Underwood and Oberweis believe climate change is real, but their solutions differon October 6, 2020 at 2:29 pm
Both candidates for Illinois' 14th Congressional District seat believe mankind is responsible for global climate change, but their solutions differ.
- What is holding back the promise of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation?on October 6, 2020 at 2:22 am
This perspective piece examines the issues that deserve greater attention to expand the use and financing of nature-based solutions.
- Rep. Dan Crenshaw calls wind and solar energy ‘silly solutions’ to climate changeon October 1, 2020 at 2:46 pm
Congressman Dan Crenshaw has made waves before by calling on Republicans to take climate change more seriously. But on Thursday, he said solar and wind power are not the answer.
via Bing News