Social media had only a small influence on how much people believed falsehoods about candidates and issues in the last two presidential elections, a pair of new national studies found.
And Facebook – which came under fire for spreading misinformation in the 2016 campaign – actually reduced misperceptions by users in that election compared to those who consumed only other social media.
The results suggest that we need to put the dangers of social media spreading misinformation in perspective, said R. Kelly Garrett, author of the study and professor of communication at The Ohio State University.
“Given the amount of attention given to the issue, it may seem surprising that social media doesn’t have a larger impact on Americans’ belief in falsehoods,” Garrett said.
“It is an issue that we should be concerned about, but it is not the main driver of why so many people believe false information about issues and candidates.”
The study was published today (March 27, 2019) in the journal PLOS ONE.
In previous research, Garrett found evidence suggesting that email contributed to the spread of false information in the 2008 election, before social media was as popular as it is today. Garrett specifically designed these studies to gauge the role of social media in what Americans believed in the last two election campaigns.
Reliance on social media for political news has increased rapidly. In 2012, about two in five Americans reported using social media for political purposes, according to the Pew Research Center.
In 2016, more Americans named Facebook as the source they used for pre-election political information than any other site, including those of major news organizations, this new research found.
“This study began long before ‘fake news’ became as popular a topic as it is today. But the questions that drive this study are very much in keeping with our concerns about how disinformation is spread online,” Garrett said.
During both the 2012 and 2016 election seasons, groups of more than 600 Americans filled out surveys online three times, indicating their social media use at each point as well as their beliefs in confirmed falsehoods.
The 2012 study involved misperceptions about the two presidential candidates, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Participants rated on a five-point scale how much they agreed with eight falsehoods, including “Barack Obama is Muslim, not Christian” and “As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney signed a health care law providing taxpayer-funded abortions.”
Overall, Republicans tended to hold less accurate beliefs about President Obama than Democrats did, while Democrats held less accurate beliefs about Romney than did Republicans.
Results showed that increasing social media use reduced participants’ belief accuracy about Obama falsehoods, although the effect was small.
In the most extreme case, someone using social media to get political information could have an accuracy score concerning Obama falsehoods almost half a point lower on the five-point scale than someone who did not use social media at all.
Social media use did not influence belief in the Romney falsehoods, Garrett said. One important reason may be that the rumors about Romney were much less known than those about Obama.
The 2016 study focused on false beliefs about four campaign issues. The misperceptions studied were: Repealing the Affordable Care Act would reduce the national debt; Most Muslims support violence against Western countries, including the U.S.; Immigrants are more likely to commit violent crimes than individuals born in the U.S.; and Human activity has no influence on global climate.
After considering more than a dozen potential issues, Garrett selected these four because they were referenced most frequently on the campaign trail and received extensive media coverage, and because of evidence that Americans were at least occasionally mistaken about them.
Results showed that, overall, Republicans beliefs tended to be less accurate than those of Democrats, which made sense because the falsehoods were a prominent part of the Republican campaign strategy, Garrett said.
Participants with higher levels of education held more accurate beliefs.
Unlike in 2012, participants in 2016 were asked which social media platforms they used during each of the three waves of the study.
Facebook was the most popular social media platform for following news among study participants, followed by YouTube and Twitter.
Overall, social media use was not related to participants’ belief accuracy on the four issues.
But the influence of using social media was different for people who used Facebook than for people who only used other platforms. Among the heaviest social media users, those who used Facebook were about a half point more accurate on the five-point scale, on average, than those who didn’t.
“It is not a huge difference, but it does call into question the conventional wisdom that Facebook had an especially harmful influence on campaign issue beliefs,” Garrett said.
He said the small effects found in this study don’t mean we should ignore the problem of fake news shared on social media – but we should reevaluate its role in Americans’ belief in falsehoods.
“We have evidence that foreign powers have tried to sway American elections by sharing falsehoods on social media and that is profoundly troubling. If it has an effect, even a small one, we should be deeply concerned,” he said.
“But we need to have a broader perspective on the problem. We know that Americans hold beliefs that are not accurate, with frightening regularity. And if social media aren’t the primary driver of this, we really should invest more energy into finding out what else is going on.”
The study was based on work supported by the National Science Foundation.
The Latest on: Social media
via Google News
The Latest on: Social media
- Mike Pence's answer to question about Breonna Taylor draws backlash on social mediaon October 7, 2020 at 10:34 pm
"Pence's response to the question 'did Breonna Taylor receive justice' was disgusting," rapper Megan Thee Stallion wrote in a tweet, which went viral.
- A Fly Landed on Mike Pence's Head at the VP Debate. The Social Media Electorate Responded Accordingly.on October 7, 2020 at 9:02 pm
As the predictably tense and longwinded debate came to an end, a fly landed on Pence's head as he attempted to navigate the complex waters of speaking about Breonna Taylor and Black Lives Matter. As ...
- The Fly In Pence's Hair And His Red Eye Dominated Social Media During Wednesday's Debateon October 7, 2020 at 8:36 pm
The issues during the hour and a half debate took a backseat on social media to a house fly and possible case of pink eye.
- The Vice Presidential Debate Got Big Social Media Attention, With or Without Mother's Approvalon October 7, 2020 at 8:09 pm
After a tumultuous news week in which [gestures wildly], this particular debate was one of the most monumental in recent history. Last week's near incomprehensible Fox News-hosted debate between ...
- Parler and Gab, two conservative social media sites, keep alleged Russian disinformation up, despite reporton October 7, 2020 at 8:07 pm
An alleged Russian disinformation campaign that has been purged from three mainstream social media platforms has moved to Parler and Gab, sites that attract conservatives.
- With A Month Until The Election There Is Open Hostility When It Comes To Politics On Social Mediaon October 7, 2020 at 5:09 am
According to some on social media President Trump is a racist who should have died from Covid-19 before it is the end of democracy, while Vice President Biden is a socialist who will bankrupt America.
- Social-Media Users May Have to Get a Special License in Lesothoon October 7, 2020 at 4:33 am
Lesotho’s government is seeking to regulate online behavior with a law compelling social-media users to obtain a so-called internet broadcasting allowance, as unease about digital platforms grows in ...
- U.S. Agency Shows No Sign of Quick Action on Trump Social Media Petitionon October 7, 2020 at 3:18 am
The Federal Communications Commission has given no indication it will move quickly on an effort by President Donald Trump to narrow the ability of social media companies to remove objectionable ...
- A new social-media platform wants to enforce “kindness.” Can that ever work?on October 7, 2020 at 2:38 am
So she was “pretty cynical” when a friend invited her to be a private beta tester for a new social-media platform, Telepath, in March 2019. She was particularly skeptical as a woman of color in tech.
- Social media postings linked to hate crimeson October 6, 2020 at 12:33 am
A new paper in the Journal of the European Economic Association, published by Oxford University Press, explores the connection between social media and hate crimes. The researchers combined methods ...
via Bing News