A large scale expansion in bioenergy crop production could be just as detrimental to biodiversity as climate change itself, according to new research.
The study, which involved expertise from Durham University’s Department of Biosciences, investigated the potential impacts of future climate and land-use change on vertebrate biodiversity across the planet.
The authors argue there is an urgent need to carefully consider biodiversity when expanding bioenergy cropland, for example growing oil palm, maize and rapeseed.
Familiar species that would be predicted to decline substantially across their global range as a consequence of an expansion in bioenergy cropland combined with climate change include the hedgehog (44% potential loss), red squirrel (46% potential loss) and common starling (15% potential loss), say the researchers.
Globally, palm oil production is already known to be having a detrimental impact on orang-utan populations.
The study, which is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences today, Monday 10 December 2018, was led by the Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre and the Technical University of Munich, Germany, in collaboration with Durham University.
Speaking about the research findings, Professor Stephen Willis, Durham University Department of Biosciences, said: “We found that the combination of climate change and large-scale expansion of bioenergy crops would together threaten about 36% of the habitats of all global vertebrate species, including many that are already the subject of significant conservation work.
“While bioenergy is clearly an important tool for climate change mitigation, the potential impacts on biodiversity must not be ignored.
“A strong reliance on bioenergy to combat climate change could result in outcomes for biodiversity that are little better than would occur if we didn’t implement bioenergy strategies, despite the consequent climate change implications.
“Instead, we should be thinking about how to swiftly and significantly reduce energy consumption if biodiversity is to be protected.”
In order to meet the Paris Agreement aims to keep the rise in global temperatures below two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, many climate mitigation scenarios rely on increased bioenergy use, requiring large-scale production of crops such as corn, rape and oil palm.
As part of their study the team compared two scenarios. The first would result in global warming of approximately 1.5 degrees Celsius by the year 2100 and relies on a maximum use of bioenergy. Under the second scenario temperatures rise by approximately three degrees Celsius by the year 2100, with a very low use of bioenergy.
Dr Christian Hof, who conducted the study at the Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre and is now based at the Technical University of Munich, said: “In order to limit climate change in this way, we would need to cultivate bioenergy crops on approximately 4.3 % of the global land area by 2100 – which corresponds to almost one-and-a-half times the area of all EU countries combined.
“This would severely affect the biodiversity currently found in these regions. The reduction of the negative effects of climate change achieved by the maximum use of bioenergy is not enough to offset this loss of biodiversity.”
Limiting climate change has been central to discussions at the recent UN Climate Change Conference in Poland.
The impacts of an expansion in bioenergy cropland are already becoming apparent. In tropical regions, oil-palm plantations are having a detrimental impact on flora and fauna. In temperate areas, the replacement of other crops with maize has negatively affected populations of farmland birds and mammals.
The Latest on: Bioenergy crop production
via Google News
The Latest on: Bioenergy crop production
- Corn Ethanol Production has Minimal Effect on Cropland Use, Study Shows on December 27, 2018 at 3:21 am
Ethanol production has increased sharply in the United States in ... Consumer and Environmental Sciences and the Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, University of Illinois, and R... […]
- Bioenergy crops could be as bad for biodiversity as climate change on December 11, 2018 at 5:08 am
A large scale expansion in bioenergy crop production could be just as detrimental to biodiversity as climate change itself, according to new research. The study, which involved expertise from Durham U... […]
- Offsetting greenhouse gas emissions using charcoal on August 10, 2018 at 5:00 pm
Richer soils would increase the crop and biomass growth – and future ... Their analysis showed that bioenergy production on fertile soils would offset the greenhouse gas emissions of coal-fired power ... […]
- Can we feed the world without destroying it? on June 2, 2018 at 11:25 pm
Food prices will likely experience future shocks due to market speculation, bio-energy crop expansions, and climatic disturbances [source]. Furthermore, only 62% of crop production is allocated to hum... […]
- Gauging the effects of water scarcity on an irrigated planet on April 20, 2018 at 4:33 am
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center researchers are evaluating the performance of a variety of novel bioenergy crop production systems for crop yield and quality, impacts on microbial-plant interact... […]
- No Crop Left Behind: Inside the USDA’s bioeconomy feedstock strategy on November 8, 2017 at 7:32 am
Seven of them were established in a $156 million NIFA commitment to AFRI Regional Bioenergy System’s Coordinated Agricultural ... on marginal lands and buffers bordering traditional row crop productio... […]
- Volner: A&B not farming any GMO food, animal feed crops on September 6, 2017 at 9:10 am
Many in the crowd were concerned about A&B farming genetically modified organism crops and suggested more food crop production on the former 36,000 ... done has been on research and development for bi... […]
- In search of next-gen bioproducts and fuels, DOE invests $40M in 4 Bioenergy Research Centers on July 17, 2017 at 12:55 pm
“The Feedstocks theme will be at the cutting edge of bioenergy crop production”, said Kimberlee K. Kidwell, Dean of the College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences (ACES) at Illinois, ... […]
- New model suggests scrubbing CO2 from the atmosphere on October 26, 2016 at 10:15 am
The researchers propose using a “bioenergy-biochar system” that removes carbon ... it can be placed into the soil as a fertilizer substitute and improve crop production. Although it has been omitted f... […]
- Texas A&M study: Bioenergy sorghum could help with GHG emissions on June 6, 2014 at 2:54 am
Researchers in the Texas A&M University soil and crop sciences department have been measuring greenhouse gases from biofuel production scenarios to help quantify the carbon footprint of a bioenergy cr... […]
via Bing News