Researchers at Oregon State University are challenging the premise that trophy hunting is an acceptable and effective tool for wildlife conservation and community development.
They argue that charging hunters to kill animals and claim body parts should be a last resort rather than a fallback plan.
In a paper published today in Conservation Letters, the researchers label the practice as morally inappropriate and say alternative strategies such as ecotourism should be fully explored and ruled out before trophy hunting is broadly endorsed.
“Trophies are body parts,” said lead author Chelsea Batavia, a Ph.D. student in OSU’s College of Forestry. “But when I read the literature, I don’t see researchers talking about them like that. Nobody’s even flinching. And at this point it seems to have become so normalized, no one really stops to think about what trophy hunting actually entails.”
Furthermore, the authors point out, the notion that trophy hunting is imperative to conservation seems to have taken hold largely without compelling empirical evidence. Such an assumption is not only unsubstantiated but can also serve to squelch the search for alternatives.
“Rejecting trophy hunting could open up space for innovation and creativity,” they write.
Batavia worked with colleagues in Oregon State’s Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society and collaborators from Canada and Australia. The idea for the paper occurred to them over the course of a review of scholarly literature on trophy hunting.
“Conservation scientists commonly recognize strong public opposition to the practice, and at times even point to some sort of ethical tension, but they don’t really define or address it,” Batavia said.
She and her co-authors decided it was time to break the silence and highlight an issue they suspect may underpin the public discomfort around trophy hunting – that it involves a hunter paying a fee to kill an animal and subsequently retaining some or all of the animal’s body as a trophy.
Part of the ongoing problem, the researchers write, is the word “trophy,” a sanitized expression for the tusks, ears, feet, heads, etc. that hunters remove from the animals’ bodies.
“It’s almost like an ethical distraction, calling it by some other name,” said co-author Michael Paul Nelson, a professor and the Ruth H. Spaniol Chair of Renewable Resources at OSU. “We have these metaphors that we hide behind. It’s like we recognize it’s an ethically loaded topic but we don’t know what to do about it. And we’ve tied conservation to the practice of trophy hunting – how do we get off that train?”
Proponents argue that trophy hunting supports conservation goals by generating money and reducing poaching and also that it bolsters local economies.
Nelson, Batavia and their co-authors recognize these benefits, but they counter that “collecting bodies or body parts as trophies is an ethically inappropriate way to interact with individual animals, regardless of the beneficial outcomes that do or do not follow.”
“We owe these animals some basic modicum of respect,” the researchers suggest. “To transform them into trophies of human conquest is a violation of common decency, and to accept trophy hunting as the international conservation community seems to have done is to aid and abet an immoral practice.”
If it’s determined that saving wildlife is inexorably linked to trophy hunting, conservationists should then “accept the practice only with a due appreciation of tragedy, and proper remorse,” the researchers write. They do acknowledge the possibility that future scientific research may suggest trophy hunting is in fact critical to the conservation mission in certain contexts.
“In that case trophy hunting should be used reluctantly,” they write. “The enthusiasm with which trophy hunting has already been championed as a potential conservation success story is misplaced. Trophy hunting violates the dignity of individual nonhuman animals, and is beneath our dignity as human beings. Continuing complicity by conservationists without fully exhausting other options is not now appropriate nor has it ever been.”
The Latest on: Trophy hunting
via Google News
The Latest on: Trophy hunting
- Liam the Charmer Journeys to Qatar for Emir's Trophy on February 21, 2019 at 7:09 am
Several of the world's top jockeys are named to ride in the Trophy, including Tyler Gaffalione on Liam the Charmer and Ryan Moore, who makes his first Doha appearance to pilot Hunting Horn for trainer ... […]
- The markhor population may have increased due to trophy hunting — but at what cost? on February 15, 2019 at 3:44 am
The recent news about trophy hunting of markhor and ibex in Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) has sparked intriguing public debates. Many have questioned the ethics of this practice, while others have asked about ... […]
- Does trophy hunting really benefit conservation and local communities? on February 15, 2019 at 2:16 am
But how many of these travellers know that some of the most luxurious safari destinations and self-declared champions of conservation also allow these iconic animals to be killed by trophy hunters for ... […]
- A Texas trophy hunter reportedly paid $110K to kill a rare mountain goat in Pakistan on February 14, 2019 at 5:13 am
"It was an easy and close shot and I am pleased to take this trophy," said Harlan as reported by Dawn ... Ethical Treatment of Animals said on Twitter criticized Harlan for his hunting adventure. "Goa... […]
- Trophy hunter 'pays $110k' to kill and pose with rare mountain goat on February 13, 2019 at 1:51 pm
(CNN) - An American trophy hunter has sparked outrage after reportedly paying ... while some Pakistanis called for a ban on hunting such animals. The markhor is the national animal of Pakistan, but it... […]
- American trophy hunter under fire after allegedly paying $110k to kill rare goat on February 13, 2019 at 10:40 am
But as pleased as the Texas-native may have been with the expedition, photos of Harlan and the slain goat have sparked outrage on social media, with people in both Pakistan and the United States calli... […]
- Trophy hunter pays $110k to kill rare mountain goat on February 13, 2019 at 7:16 am
An American trophy hunter has sparked outrage after reportedly ... Bryan Kinsel Harlen Markhor hunting in Pakistan.. Posted by Abdullah Khalid on Tuesday, February 5, 2019 Harlan poses with ... […]
- Zambia hippo cull a ‘money-grabbing’ deal with trophy hunters, charity claims on February 13, 2019 at 2:04 am
The killing of 1,250 hippos over five years could generate upwards of $3.4 million for trophy hunting outfitters and the Zambian government, the charity claims. Dr. Mark Jones, Associate Director ... […]
- Trophy Hunter Pays $110K to Kill 'Screw Horn Goat' on February 12, 2019 at 8:32 pm
For decades, the goats' numbers had been falling due to poachers, deforestation, logging, and uncontrolled trophy hunting—along with many other reasons. In 2011, just 2,500 of the animals, which are n... […]
via Bing News