MANY FORENSIC METHODS HAVE NEVER BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED, SCIENTISTS NOTE IN EDITORIAL
Many of the “forensic science” methods commonly used in criminal cases and portrayed in popular police TV dramas have never been scientifically validated and may lead to unjust verdicts, according to an editorial in this week’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The authors were the six independent scientists who served on the National Commission for Forensic Science (NCFS), a panel set up in 2013 by the U.S. Department of Justice and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The NCFS was terminated early last year when the DOJ did not renewed its charter.
The scientists wrote their editorial as an appeal to the scientific community to help maintain the momentum in putting forensic science on a firmer scientific basis. The co-authors include colleagues from West Virginia University, Cornell University, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Brown University and the University of Arizona.
“We wanted to alert people that this is a continuing and a major issue: that many of the forensic techniques used today to put people in jail have no scientific backing,” says senior author Arturo Casadevall, MD, Bloomberg Distinguished Professor and the Alfred & Jill Sommer Professor and Chair of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Casadevall and colleagues argue in their essay that the problems with forensic science are rooted in the discipline’s traditional close association with prosecutors and law enforcement. “Almost all publicly funded [forensic] laboratories, whether federal, state, or local, are associated with law enforcement. At the very least, this creates a potential conflict-of-interest,” they note.
Traditional forensic methods aimed at linking suspects to patterns found at the crime scene—fingerprints, bite-marks, footprints, tire-marks—were developed by law-enforcement laboratories and matured largely outside of mainstream scientific culture. Once these methods became admissible in criminal cases they continued to be used in court by the principle of judicial precedent. Yet while fingerprint analysis recently has been reformed into a more quantified, objective, empirically based method, most other traditional pattern-matching methods continue to be used despite insufficient understanding of their accuracy and reliability.
“The forensic experts might claim, for example, that the fibers isolated from a body ‘match’ the fibers in a rug that was in the back of the suspect’s truck, but generally they won’t be able to say what the error rate in their conclusion is” Casadevall says. “In other words, they haven’t properly characterized the uncertainties involved in concluding that it is a match.”
A major catalyst for a re-think of forensic methods was DNA analysis, which entered widespread use in forensics in the 1990s and had an unprecedentedly high accuracy and reliability. DNA analysis overturned many convictions that had been based on traditional, less precise methods, and forced the recognition that these traditional methods were overdue for scientific scrutiny.
At the behest of Congress, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) convened a panel to study the problem, and in 2009 the NAS panel issued a report that was sharply critical of contemporary forensic science. The authors concluded that “with the exception of nuclear DNA analysis … no forensic method has been rigorously shown to have the capacity to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source.”
The NAS report also recommended the establishment of a research organization that would be dedicated to reforming forensic science and bringing it into mainstream scientific culture. The report urged that this entity be independent of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which understandably has little institutional interest in questioning older methods, since that could lead to the overturning of old verdicts.
In the end, though, DOJ prevailed. The NCFS was established to increase communication among academic scientists, judges, prosecutors, lawyers, and the forensic science community, but it was placed under the joint administration of the DOJ and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Following the 2016 presidential election, the winds shifted and DOJ declined to renew the commission.
“It’s a shame—we had been making a lot of progress,” Casadevall says. “Commissioners were realizing that in addressing these questions they might be able to improve their methods and the justice system.”
Casadevall sees little chance that the NCFS will be resurrected by the current administration, but he and his colleagues hope that by drawing attention to the problem, they can inspire the scientific and forensic communities to keep pushing for reforms, for example, mandatory empirical testing of all methods that are currently admissible in court.
“We’re hoping to keep the issue alive,” he says, “and we can see that a lot of otherwise educated and well-informed people still don’t understand the extent of the problem.”
The Latest on: Forensic methods
via Google News
The Latest on: Forensic methods
- Here’s how cyber forensics go about cleaning up the mess after an attack on February 20, 2019 at 3:05 am
For instance, if an agency seeks to prove that an individual has committed crimes related to identity theft, cyber forensics investigators use sophisticated methods to sift through hard drives, email ... […]
- Demand sees Grant Thornton expand its forensic and investigations team on February 19, 2019 at 1:02 am
Paul Jacob, head of the forensic and investigations team ... "By continuing to invest in new technologies, we can ensure the most advanced techniques remain at our disposal as we help keep our clients ... […]
- Network Forensics Market Global Overview By 2017 Key Players - NIKSUN, IBM Corporation, EMC RSA, NETSCOUT Systems on February 17, 2019 at 10:32 pm
In other words, network forensics is the specific network analysis that is conducted after security attacks and similar cybercrimes. Numerous methods are used in network forensics. Some kinds of netwo... […]
- Forensic expert proves why Diana WASN'T pregnant at the time of her death on February 17, 2019 at 4:25 am
who was head of the department of forensic science at King's College in London. Cowan said that blood transfusions received by the princess could complicate the result meaning they had to rely on othe... […]
- US Ambassador visits forensics training workshop in Zambia on February 15, 2019 at 4:41 am
The meeting, convened by TRACE Wildlife Forensics Network, the Netherlands Forensic Institute ... During the training events, participants learned about poaching crime scene investigation techniques, ... […]
- Learn professional hacking techniques in this online course on February 14, 2019 at 6:52 am
That includes how to breach wireless network security and how to legally collect and handle digital evidence as you conduct your own forensic investigations ... your potential employer’s business, and ... […]
- Turkish Australian scientist develops a new method in Forensic Science on February 13, 2019 at 6:03 pm
Turkish Australian Dilan Seçkiner, a Ph.D. candidate of the University of Technology Sydney, has developed a new method of analysis to detect suspects from CCTV cameras that play an essential role in ... […]
- Beyond CSI: How big data is reshaping the world of forensics on February 13, 2019 at 11:00 am
And indeed, according to a landmark 2009 National Academic of Sciences report on forensic science, such techniques have done a great deal to help capture criminals and ensure innocent people go free. ... […]
- GreyEnergy malware uses junk code and anti-analysis techniques to evade detection on February 13, 2019 at 4:40 am
"The threat actors' broad use of anti-forensic techniques underlines their attempt to be stealthy and ensure that the infection would go unnoticed," said Alessandro Di Pinto, a researcher at industria... […]
via Bing News