New research published today in Nature Geoscience has found that climate engineering that modifies the properties of the land surface in highly populated areas and agricultural areas over North America, Europe and Asia could reduce extreme temperatures there by up to 2-3°C.
The modifications could include lightening buildings, roads and other infrastructure in high population areas and changing crops and engaging in no-till agricultural practices.
Unlike many other climate-engineering methods proposed to tackle climate change, many of these regional modifications have already been tested and proven to work. Critically, this method has fewer risks compared with injecting aerosols into the atmosphere.
“Extreme temperatures are where human and natural systems are most vulnerable. Changing the radiative properties of land helps address this issue with fewer side effects,” said Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, Prof Andy Pitman.
“This research suggests that by taking a regional approach, at least in temperate zones, policy and investment decisions can be pragmatically and affordably focused on areas of greatest need.”
By contrast other proposed forms of large-scale climate engineering, such as spraying sulphate aerosols into the atmosphere, fertilising the ocean with iron and even building giant mirrors in space, have questionable effectiveness and are likely to alter climate systems in unexpected ways. They could make situations worse for some countries.
The researchers gained their results by modelling how changing only the radiative properties of agricultural land and high population areas across North America, Europe and Asia would impact average temperatures, extreme temperatures and precipitation.
The results showed small impacts on average temperatures, little change in precipitation – except in Asia – but significant reductions in extreme temperatures.
“Regional land-based climate engineering can be effective but we need to consider competing demands for land use, for instance for food production, biodiversity, carbon uptake, recreational areas and much more before putting it into effect,” said lead author Prof Sonia Seneviratne of ETH Zurich.
“We must remember land-based climate engineering is not a silver bullet, it is just one part of a possible climate solution, and it would have no effects on global mean warming or ocean acidification. There are still important moral, economic and practical imperatives to consider that mean mitigation and adaption should still remain at the forefront of our approach to dealing with global warming.”
The Latest on: Climate engineering
Letters to the editor: Climate engineering isn't safe; Democrats are pro-choice
on July 18, 2018 at 1:35 pm
Until about nine months ago, I hadn't heard about Solar Radiation Management, a form of climate engineering that involves spraying highly toxic heavy metal and chemical aerosols from airplanes into th... […]
Pros and Cons of Climate Engineering to Combat Climate Change
on July 16, 2018 at 3:46 pm
It’s a popular term these days, cropping up in the news and online discussions, in books and movies. The ubiquity of the topic reflects the importance of the issue, and many of the proposed solutions ... […]
Letter: Geo-engineering and climate change
on December 9, 2017 at 4:00 am
Has anyone noticed the weather lately? People mowing their lawns in December? Heat waves all over the country and abroad? ("Freak warm spell surges temps 50+ degrees in Greenland," weather.com, Nov 29 ... […]
Public—and researchers—skeptical to climate engineering
on November 15, 2017 at 6:40 am
What does the general public know about climate engineering, and what do they think about what they know? These were questions asked by researchers from Linköping University, together with researchers ... […]
Geo-Engineering: Can We “Science Our Way” Out Of A Climate Catastrophe?
on October 16, 2017 at 9:13 am
Today, I opened my digital copy of The Guardian while I having my morning cup of Darjeeling and see this headline: “Geo-engineering Is Not A Quick Fix For Climate Change, Experts Warn Trump.” But it’s ... […]
Team Trump Ponders Climate ‘Engineering’
on April 5, 2017 at 6:15 am
Exclusive: Rather than take prudent steps to reduce the release of global-warming gases, some Trump advisers are pondering risky gambles to re-engineer the Earth’s climate, as Jonathan Marshall explai... […]
Scientists Who Want To Study Climate Engineering Shun Trump
on March 29, 2017 at 5:00 am
President Trump issued a sweeping executive order on Tuesday that will begin to undo a slew of government efforts to fight global warming. Among those worrying and watching to see how the executive or... […]
Climate engineering ideas no longer considered pie in the sky
on March 6, 2014 at 5:57 am
WASHINGTON — As international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions stall, schemes to slow global warming using fantastical technologies once dismissed as a sideshow are getting serious considera... […]
Climate engineering faces PR problem
on January 14, 2014 at 4:00 am
Climate engineering The general public have an overall negative image of climate engineering, which includes proposals to use mirrors in space to reduce global warming, a new study has found. Although ... […]
Climate engineering—what do the public think?
on January 13, 2014 at 4:00 am
Members of the public have a negative view of climate engineering, the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the environment to counteract climate change, according to a new study. The results are fr... […]
via Google News and Bing News