New research published today in Nature Geoscience has found that climate engineering that modifies the properties of the land surface in highly populated areas and agricultural areas over North America, Europe and Asia could reduce extreme temperatures there by up to 2-3°C.
The modifications could include lightening buildings, roads and other infrastructure in high population areas and changing crops and engaging in no-till agricultural practices.
Unlike many other climate-engineering methods proposed to tackle climate change, many of these regional modifications have already been tested and proven to work. Critically, this method has fewer risks compared with injecting aerosols into the atmosphere.
“Extreme temperatures are where human and natural systems are most vulnerable. Changing the radiative properties of land helps address this issue with fewer side effects,” said Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, Prof Andy Pitman.
“This research suggests that by taking a regional approach, at least in temperate zones, policy and investment decisions can be pragmatically and affordably focused on areas of greatest need.”
By contrast other proposed forms of large-scale climate engineering, such as spraying sulphate aerosols into the atmosphere, fertilising the ocean with iron and even building giant mirrors in space, have questionable effectiveness and are likely to alter climate systems in unexpected ways. They could make situations worse for some countries.
The researchers gained their results by modelling how changing only the radiative properties of agricultural land and high population areas across North America, Europe and Asia would impact average temperatures, extreme temperatures and precipitation.
The results showed small impacts on average temperatures, little change in precipitation – except in Asia – but significant reductions in extreme temperatures.
“Regional land-based climate engineering can be effective but we need to consider competing demands for land use, for instance for food production, biodiversity, carbon uptake, recreational areas and much more before putting it into effect,” said lead author Prof Sonia Seneviratne of ETH Zurich.
“We must remember land-based climate engineering is not a silver bullet, it is just one part of a possible climate solution, and it would have no effects on global mean warming or ocean acidification. There are still important moral, economic and practical imperatives to consider that mean mitigation and adaption should still remain at the forefront of our approach to dealing with global warming.”
The Latest on: Climate engineering
Climate Engineering Would Have Severe Impacts If Stopped
on January 22, 2018 at 8:14 am
Facing a climate crisis, we may someday spray sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere to form a cloud that cools the Earth, but suddenly stopping the spraying would have a severe global impact on animals and plants, according to the first study on the ... […]
Letter: Geo-engineering and climate change
on December 9, 2017 at 4:00 am
Has anyone noticed the weather lately? People mowing their lawns in December? Heat waves all over the country and abroad? ("Freak warm spell surges temps 50+ degrees in Greenland," weather.com, Nov 29.) There has been an upsurge in reporting on climate ... […]
Public—and researchers—skeptical to climate engineering
on November 15, 2017 at 6:40 am
What does the general public know about climate engineering, and what do they think about what they know? These were questions asked by researchers from Linköping University, together with researchers from Japan, the US and New Zealand. With the Paris ... […]
Geo-Engineering: Can We “Science Our Way” Out Of A Climate Catastrophe?
on October 16, 2017 at 9:13 am
Today, I opened my digital copy of The Guardian while I having my morning cup of Darjeeling and see this headline: “Geo-engineering Is Not A Quick Fix For Climate Change, Experts Warn Trump.” But it’s the sub-head that grabs my attention ... […]
Team Trump Ponders Climate ‘Engineering’
on April 5, 2017 at 6:15 am
Exclusive: Rather than take prudent steps to reduce the release of global-warming gases, some Trump advisers are pondering risky gambles to re-engineer the Earth’s climate, as Jonathan Marshall explains. Now, to compound the irony, members of Trump’s ... […]
Scientists Who Want To Study Climate Engineering Shun Trump
on March 29, 2017 at 5:00 am
President Trump issued a sweeping executive order on Tuesday that will begin to undo a slew of government efforts to fight global warming. Among those worrying and watching to see how the executive order plays out are scientists who actually are in favor ... […]
on March 10, 2016 at 4:08 am
Novel approaches in climate engineering have been suggested to bring temperatures down (“Cooling the earth down”, March 9). However, the apprehensions that have also been stated need to be considered and the implications carefully studied before ... […]
via Google News and Bing News