Machine learning computer systems, which get better with experience, are poised to transform the economy much as steam engines and electricity have in the past. They can outperform people in a number of tasks, though they are unlikely to replace people in all jobs.
So say Carnegie Mellon University’s Tom Mitchell and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Erik Brynjolfsson in a Policy Forum commentary published in the Dec. 22 edition of the journal Science. Mitchell, who founded the world’s first Machine Learning Department at CMU, and Brynjolfsson, director of the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy in the Sloan School of Management, describe 21 criteria to evaluate whether a task or a job is amenable to machine learning (ML).
“Although the economic effects of ML are relatively limited today, and we are not facing the imminent ‘end of work’ as is sometimes proclaimed, the implications for the economy and the workforce going forward are profound,” they write. The skills people choose to develop and the investments businesses make will determine who thrives and who falters once ML is ingrained in everyday life, they argue.
ML is one element of what is known as artificial intelligence. Rapid advances in ML have yielded recent improvements in facial recognition, natural language understanding and computer vision. It already is widely used for credit card fraud detection, recommendation systems and financial market analysis, with new applications such as medical diagnosis on the horizon.
Predicting how ML will affect a particular job or profession can be difficult because ML tends to automate or semi-automate individual tasks, but jobs often involve multiple tasks, only some of which are amenable to ML approaches.
“We don’t know how all of this will play out,” acknowledged Mitchell, the E. Fredkin University Professor in CMU’s School of Computer Science. Earlier this year, for instance, researchers showed that a ML program could detect skin cancers better than a dermatologist. That doesn’t mean ML will replace dermatologists, who do many things other than evaluate lesions.
“I think what’s going to happen to dermatologists is they will become better dermatologists and will have more time to spend with patients,” Mitchell said. “People whose jobs involve human-to-human interaction are going to be more valuable because they can’t be automated.”
Tasks that are amenable to ML include those for which a lot of data is available, Mitchell and Brynjolfsson write. To learn how to detect skin cancer, for instance, ML programs were able to study more than 130,000 labeled examples of skin lesions. Likewise, credit card fraud detection programs can be trained with hundreds of millions of examples.
ML can be a game changer for tasks that already are online, such as scheduling. Jobs that don’t require dexterity, physical skills or mobility also are more suitable for ML. Tasks that involve making quick decisions based on data are a good fit for ML programs; not so if the decision depends on long chains of reasoning, diverse background knowledge or common sense.
ML is not a good option if the user needs a detailed explanation for how a decision was made, according to the authors. In other words, ML might be better than a physician at detecting skin cancers, but a dermatologist is better at explaining why a lesion is cancerous or not. Work is underway, however, on “explainable” ML systems.
Understanding the precise applicability of ML in the workforce is critical for understanding its likely economic impact, the authors say. Earlier this year, a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine study on information technology and the workforce, co-chaired by Mitchell and Brynjolfsson, noted that information technology advances have contributed to growing wage inequality.
“Although there are many forces contributing to inequality, such as increased globalization, the potential for large and rapid changes due to ML, in many cases within a decade, suggests that the economic effects may be highly disruptive, creating both winners and losers,” they write. “This will require considerable attention among policy makers, business leaders, technologists and researchers.”
Learn more: Machine Learning Will Change Jobs
The Latest on: Machine learning
Can machine learning make sense of government's IT spend?
on July 11, 2018 at 3:37 pm
The Trump administration wants the Technology Business Management framework -- a detailed system for tracking IT investments and measuring the business outcomes they deliver -- to be embraced governme... […]
Novartis Seeks Hidden Cures in Machine Learning, AI
on July 11, 2018 at 11:05 am
Novartis' Global Drug Development has completed the first phase of a digital transformation that has enabled it to better leverage one of its best assets -- data. Big companies may not be as fast movi... […]
Which industries will reap the biggest rewards from the machine-learning boom?
on July 11, 2018 at 10:21 am
The verticals that have most to gain from AI. How many jobs will AI destroy and why we need to share the spoils 1:39 Breaking the tech giants' stranglehold on AI: Why machine learning needs to be dece... […]
Breaking the tech giants' stranglehold on AI: Why machine learning needs to be decentralized
on July 11, 2018 at 9:52 am
Thomas Hain, chief scientific officer and co-founder of Fetch.ai, on peer-to-peer machine learning. Which industries will reap the biggest rewards from the machine-learning boom? 1:21 How many jobs wi... […]
Boston machine learning company establishes Columbus foothold by acquiring AI startup
on July 11, 2018 at 8:49 am
Nexosis Inc., a startup that helps corporate software developers plug machine learning into their problem-solving, has been acquired by a complementary Boston company that plans to grow the Columbus o... […]
Are Machine Learning and Adversarial AI the New Insider Threats?
on July 11, 2018 at 8:37 am
Share Are Machine Learning and Adversarial AI the New Insider Threats? on Twitter Share Are Machine Learning and Adversarial AI the New Insider Threats? on Facebook Share Are Machine Learning and Adve... […]
Hinge’s newest feature claims to use machine learning to find your best match
on July 11, 2018 at 8:16 am
Hinge’s newest feature — Most Compatible — attempts to use all your cumulative data to find the perfect match for you. The company’s been testing this feature, which occasionally recommends a possible ... […]
Machine Learning Vs. Artificial Intelligence: How Are They Different?
on July 11, 2018 at 6:00 am
Artificial intelligence and machines have become a part of everyday life, but that doesn't mean we understand them well. Do you know the difference between machine learning (ML) and artificial intelli... […]
Google Announces Machine Learning-Based Ads Designed for Foot Traffic, Attribution, Personalization
on July 10, 2018 at 11:43 pm
Google announced on Tuesday a suite of new machine learning-backed ad tools that promise to keep its brand partners happy at a time when digital advertising faces unprecedented brand safety concerns. ... […]
Apple combines machine learning and Siri teams, snags former Google AI chief John Giannandrea to lead them
on July 10, 2018 at 3:55 pm
Apple could be planning to take AI research more seriously in the future if recent reports are anything to go by. Today, the company decided to merge their artificial intelligence, machine learning, a... […]
via Google News and Bing News