It may surprise many, especially those susceptible to the CSI effect, but fingerprint evidence is not conclusive beyond a reasonable doubt.
A new American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) working group report on the quality of latent fingerprint analysis says that courtroom testimony and reports stating or even implying that fingerprints collected from a crime scene belong to a single person are indefensible and lack scientific foundation.
“Fingerprinting is one of the most heavily used forensic methods. Routinely, fingerprint analysts report and testify to ‘identification,’ that is, that the person who left the mark at the crime scene is the same person whose fingerprint is in the database, said Joseph B. (Jay) Kadane, Carnegie Mellon University’s Leonard J. Savage University Professor of Statistics and Social Sciences, Emeritus. “Our review of the scientific literature found that there is no scientific way to estimate the number of people in some community—a city, a state, the country, the world—who share the characteristics found, and hence no scientific basis for identification.”
Kadane, William Thompson, of the University of California, Irvine, Black & White Forensics, LLC’s John Blackand Michigan State University’s Anil Jain illustrate in “Forensic Science Assessments: A Quality and Gap Analysis of Latent Fingerprint Analysis” that while latent fingerprint examiners can successfully rule out most of the population from being the source of a latent fingerprint based on observed features, insufficient data exist to determine how fingerprint features really are unique. This makes it scientifically baseless to claim that an analysis has enabled examiners to narrow the pool of sources to a single person.
Forensic science is an important tool for investigating crime and helping to determine guilt or innocence at trial, but questions have been raised about the validity and reliability of many forensic disciplines. A crucial National Research Council report issued in 2009 noted that most forensic disciplines have not been subjected to rigorous scientific study. And there is no way to know which aspects of these disciplines were based on a solid scientific footing and which were not.
This new report examines the bases for latent fingerprint examination, and sets forth what is known, what is not known and where there are gaps. The 14 recommendations in the report constitute a roadmap for further research. The report should also help key actors in the criminal justice system–law enforcement, lawyers and judges–make more informed decisions.
The Latest on: Fingerprint evidence
- Nelson County students participate in fingerprinting workshop on February 20, 2019 at 7:13 am
In the new class offering, they learn how to reconstruct a [crime scene] and how to analyze physical evidence such as blood, DNA, and fingerprints. “The students choose a topic each semester they want ... […]
- Clark trial begins in Fort Dodge on February 20, 2019 at 12:07 am
We’ve got his fingerprint.” He also said that Clark posted a selfie ... s witnesses is a gang member and that the gun used in the Applebee’s case “is evidence in another case.” Wilson also said that t... […]
- Forensic scientists testify about DNA, other evidence in murder trial on February 19, 2019 at 5:40 pm
He was able to retrieve evidence from a cellphone that was submitted for analysis ... According to the scientists, there was no DNA or fingerprints on the cellphone. Daniels said she did not test the ... […]
- The fingerprints taken in 1990 that led to the arrest of accused Claremont serial killer on February 19, 2019 at 2:23 pm
New details and allegations surrounding the fingerprints were put forward by prosecutors as proposed evidence on Tuesday during Mr Edwards' pre-trial directions hearing. Lead prosecutor, Carmel Barbag... […]
- Fingerprints, foot impressions: Further proposed evidence emerges in Claremont serial killer case on February 19, 2019 at 2:23 pm
Three out of four fingerprints found at the scene of an 1988 attempted break-in in Huntingdale allegedly matched Bradley Robert Edwards nearly 30 years later, the Supreme Court heard on Tuesday. New d... […]
- Crisp County murder conviction upheld by Georgia Supreme Court on February 19, 2019 at 1:48 pm
S. Constitution and Georgia statutory law, that the trial court erred by denying a motion in limine to exclude an incriminating statement by Grant, that the trial court erred by admitting testimony ab... […]
- UPDATE: Attorney for Grundy Co. man convicted in 2006 murder says new evidence shows innocence on February 16, 2019 at 3:14 pm
Braseel's attorney says five pieces of new evidence show that he did not commit the crime. A fingerprint at the scene of the crime was identified as belonging to someone else. The individual Braseel's ... […]
- DNA from facial tissue, fingerprints lead to murder charge in Kansas City on February 16, 2019 at 3:48 am
KANSAS CITY. Mo. - A Kansas City man is accused of second-degree murder and armed criminal action after DNA evidence and fingerprints linked to a fatal shooting outside a convenience store, the The Ka... […]
- Jury considering verdict in soldier murder trial ask about fingerprint evidence on February 15, 2019 at 6:23 am
A jury considering their verdict in the trial of a Dublin man accused of murdering a former soldier has asked about fingerprint evidence. Gary Watson (35), with an address at Millbrook Avenue, Kilbarr... […]
- Judge orders new trial for Whalen, cites 'new, relevant and material evidence' on February 13, 2019 at 11:00 am
Drazewski said the DNA evidence and fingerprint evidence presented during the post-conviction process warrants a new trial for Whalen. He noted the new evidence is great enough to "undermine confidenc... […]
via Google News and Bing News