Aug 062017

WordNet is a lexical database for the English language. It groups English words into sets of synonyms called synsets, provides short definitions and usage examples, and records a number of relations among these synonym sets or their members. Researchers from The University of Texas at Austin developed a method to incorporate information from WordNet into informational retrieval systems. [Courtesy of Visuwords.]

Researchers combine artificial intelligence, crowdsourcing and supercomputers to develop better, and more reasoned, information extraction and classification methods

How do search engines generate lists of relevant links?

The outcome is the result of two powerful forces in the evolution of information retrieval: artificial intelligence — especially natural language processing — and crowdsourcing.

Computer algorithms interpret the relationship between the words we type and the vast number of possible web pages based on the frequency of linguistic connections in the billions of texts on which the system has been trained.

Matt Lease, Associate Professor, School of Information, University of Texas at Austin

But that is not the only source of information. The semantic relationships get strengthened by professional annotators who hand-tune results — and the algorithms that generate them — for topics of importance, and by web searchers (us) who, in our clicks, tell the algorithms which connections are the best ones.Despite the incredible, world-changing success of this model, it has its flaws. Search engine results are often not as “smart” as we’d like them to be, lacking a true understanding of language and human logic. Beyond that, they sometimes replicate and deepen the biases embedded in our searches, rather than bringing us new information or insight.

Matthew Lease, an associate professor in the School of Information at The University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin), believes there may be better ways to harness the dual power of computers and human minds to create more intelligent information retrieval (IR) systems.

Combining AI with the insights of annotators and the information encoded in domain-specific resources, he and his collaborators are developing new approaches to IR that will benefit general search engines, as well as niche ones like those for medical knowledge or non-English texts.

This week, at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics in Vancouver, Canada, Lease and collaborators from UT Austin and Northeastern University presented two papers describing their novel IR systems. Their research leverages the supercomputing resources at the Texas Advanced Computing Center, one of the leading supercomputing research centers in the world.


In one paper, led by Ph.D. student An Nguyen, they presented a method that combines input from multiple annotators to determine the best overall annotation for a given text. They applied this method to two problems: analyzing free-text research articles describing medical studies to extract details of each study (e.g., the condition, patient demographics, treatments, and outcomes), and recognizing named-entities — analyzing breaking news stories to identify the events, people, and places involved.

“An important challenge in natural language processing is accurately finding important information contained in free-text, which lets us extract it into databases and combine it with other data in order to make more intelligent decisions and new discoveries,” Lease said. “We’ve been using crowdsourcing to annotate medical and news articles at scale so that our intelligent systems will be able to more accurately find the key information contained in each article.”

Such annotation has traditionally been performed by in-house, domain experts. However, more recently crowdsourcing has become a popular means to acquire large labeled datasets at lower cost. Predictably, annotations from laypeople are of lower quality than those from domain experts, so it is necessary to estimate the reliability of crowd annotators and also aggregate individual annotations to come up with a single set of “reference standard” consensus labels.

Lease’s team found that their method was able to train a neural network — a form of artificial intelligence (AI) modeled on the human brain — so it could very accurately predict named entities and extract relevant information in unannotated texts. The new method improved upon existing tagging and training methods. The method also provides an estimate of each worker’s label quality, which can be transferred between tasks and is useful for error analysis and intelligently routing tasks — identifying the best person to annotate each particular text.


The group’s second paper, led by Ph.D. student Ye Zhang, addressed the fact that neural models for natural language processing (NLP) often ignore existing resources like WordNet — a lexical database for the English language that groups words into sets of synonyms — or domain-specific ontologies, such as the Unified Medical Language System, which encode knowledge about a given field.

An example of grouped partial weight sharing, here with two groups. Lease’s team stochastically selects embedding weights to be shared between words belonging to the same groups. Weight sharing constrains the number of free parameters that a system must learn, increases the efficiency and accuracy of the neural model, and serves as a flexible way to incorporate prior knowledge, combining the best of human knowledge with machine learning. [Courtesy: Ye Zhang, Matthew Lease, UT Austin; Byron C. Wallace, Northeastern University]

They proposed a method for exploiting these existing linguistic resources via weight sharing to improve NLP models for automatic text classification. For example, their model learns to classify whether or not published medical articles describing clinical trials are relevant to a well-specified clinical question.

In weight sharing, words that are similar share some fraction of a weight, or assigned numerical value. Weight sharing constrains the number of free parameters that a system must learn, thereby increasing the efficiency and accuracy of the neural model, and serving as a flexible way to incorporate prior knowledge. In doing so, they combine the best of human knowledge with machine learning.

“Neural network models have tons of parameters and need lots of data to fit them,” said Lease. “We had this idea that if you could somehow reason about some words being related to other words a priori, then instead of having to have a parameter for each one of those word separately, you could tie together the parameters across multiple words and in that way need less data to learn the model. It would realize the benefits of deep learning without large data constraints.”

They applied a form of weight sharing to a sentiment analysis of movie reviews and to a biomedical search related to anemia. Their approach consistently yielded improved performance on classification tasks compared to strategies that did not exploit weight sharing.

“This provides a general framework for codifying and exploiting domain knowledge in data-driven neural network models,” say Byron Wallace, Lease’s collaborator from Northeastern University. (Wallace was formerly also a faculty member at UT Austin and became a frequent user of TACC as well.)

Lease, Wallace and their collaborators used the GPUs (graphics processing units) on the Maverick supercomputer at TACC to enable their analyses and train the machine learning system.

“Training neural computing models for big data takes a lot of compute time,” Lease said. “That’s where TACC fits in as a wonderful resource, not only because of the great storage that’s available, but also the large number of nodes and the high processing speeds available for training neural models.”

In addition to GPUs, TACC deploys cutting-edge processing architectures developed by Intel to which the machine learning libraries are playing catch up, according to Lease.

“Training neural computing models for big data takes a lot of compute time. That’s where TACC fits in as a wonderful resource, not only because of the great storage that’s available, but also the large number of nodes and the high processing speeds available for training neural models.”

Matt Lease, The University of Texas at Austin

“Though many deep learning libraries have been highly optimized for processing on GPUs, there’s reason to think that these other architectures will be faster in the long term once they’ve been optimized as well,” he said.

“With the introduction of Stampede2 and its many core infrastructure, we are glad to see more optimization of CPU-based machine learning frameworks,” said Niall Gaffney, Director of Data Intensive Computing at TACC. “Project like Matt’s show the power of machine learning in both measured and simulated data analysis.”

Gaffney says that in TACC’s initial work with Caffe — a deep learning framework developed at the University of California, Berkeley, which has been optimized by Intel for Xeon Phi processors — they are finding that CPUs have roughly the equivalent performance for many AI jobs at GPUs.

“This can be transformative as it allows us to offer more nodes that can satisfy these researchers as well as allowing HPC users to leverage AI in their analysis phases, without having to move to a different GPU enabled system,” he said.

By improving core natural language processing technologies for automatic information extraction and the classification of texts, web search engines built on these technologies can continue to improve.

Lease has received grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to improve the quality of crowdsourcing across a variety of tasks, scales, and settings. He says that though commercial web search companies invest a lot of resources to develop practical, effective solutions, the demands of industry lead them to focus on problems with commercial application and short-term solutions.

“Industry is great at looking at near-term things, but they don’t have the same freedom as academic researchers to pursue research ideas that are higher risk but could be more transformative in the long-term,” Lease said. “This is where we benefit from public investment for powering discoveries. Resources like TACC are incredibly empowering for researchers in enabling us to pursue high-risk, potentially transformative research.”



The Latest on: Search engines
  • Tibetan-language search engine receives 120 mln visits
    on August 22, 2017 at 6:36 pm

    China's first Tibetan-language search engine,, has attracted more than 120 million visits since its launch a year ago, the developers said. Users of the search engine cover China's 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities, as ... […]

  • Google's Personalized Search Explained:
    on August 22, 2017 at 6:11 pm

    Add the newly created search engine to your active columns, and go on and check your rankings. Your previous searches, the search results you clicked on, and your browser history affect how Google will personalize search results for you in the future. […]

  • Chrome on Android adding support for third-party search engine logos
    on August 22, 2017 at 6:05 pm

    Earlier this year, an anti-trust lawsuit in Russia led Google to make some changes with Chrome on Android. The settlement required Google to develop a search widget that uses any search engine, which shipped as part of Chrome 60. Chrome also now asks users ... […]

  • 9 Quick Restaurant SEO Tips to Boost Your Google Search Visibility
    on August 22, 2017 at 4:55 am

    Regardless of how your restaurant website has performed in Google to date, there are always opportunities to improve your search engine optimization (SEO) and increase your Google rankings. Improving your search visibility will drive more hungry customers ... […]

  • 2017: A Year of Experimentation for Google Local Search
    on August 22, 2017 at 4:28 am

    Now, restaurants can upload their entire menu to Google, using structured markup that allows the search engine to understand the content. Along with providing consumers with a lot more information about a restaurant’s offerings, structured menus could ... […]

  • Search Analytics in Google Search Console Delayed 1 Week
    on August 21, 2017 at 12:38 pm

    As you can imagine, this is very frustrating for many website owners, including myself. As a search engine optimization consultant, I honestly can’t provide the top-notch service to my clients when I can’t get access to this data. Search engine keyword ... […]

  • Optimized store landing pages: An important part of local search strategy
    on August 21, 2017 at 9:11 am

    These pages also exist within a logical hierarchy of pages, as evidenced by their URL structure: Party City also leverages structured data markup from to provide search engines ... […]

  • Fashion-Finding Search Engines
    on August 20, 2017 at 4:13 am

    Finding just the right product or clothing piece that you're looking for can consist of a difficult process that includes searching all your favorite online retailers, so 'theurge' is here to be your own personal fashion search engine. 'theurge' works by ... […]

  • Google needs to pay Apple a small fortune to remain the default search engine on iOS
    on August 20, 2017 at 12:00 am

    Apple and Google could be the biggest frenemies in tech. While they both compete like there’s no tomorrow, they also partner on some very specific deals. For instance, Google is paying a ton of money to remain the default search engine on iOS. As CNBC ... […]

  • SEO Tutorial: 12 Immutable Laws For Dominating Google's Search
    on August 18, 2017 at 8:30 am

    We are all experts at searching. But how many of us know how to dominate Google's search engine to appear relevantly in an online search? Not many. But if you search for an SEO tutorial online, you get an endless array of tips from so-called "experts." […]

via Google News and Bing News

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: