As CRISPR-Cas9 starts to move into clinical trials, a new study published in Nature Methods has found that the gene-editing technology can introduce hundreds of unintended mutations into the genome.
“We feel it’s critical that the scientific community consider the potential hazards of all off-target mutations caused by CRISPR, including single nucleotide mutations and mutations in non-coding regions of the genome,” says co-author Stephen Tsang, MD, PhD, the Laszlo T. Bito Associate Professor of Ophthalmology and associate professor of pathology and cell biology at Columbia University Medical Center and in Columbia’s Institute of Genomic Medicine and the Institute of Human Nutrition.
CRISPR-Cas9 editing technology — by virtue of its speed and unprecedented precision — has been a boon for scientists trying to understand the role of genes in disease. The technique has also raised hope for more powerful gene therapies that can delete or repair flawed genes, not just add new genes.
The first clinical trial to deploy CRISPR is now underway in China, and a U.S. trial is slated to start next year. But even though CRISPR can precisely target specific stretches of DNA, it sometimes hits other parts of the genome. Most studies that search for these off-target mutations use computer algorithms to identify areas most likely to be affected and then examine those areas for deletions and insertions.
“These predictive algorithms seem to do a good job when CRISPR is performed in cells or tissues in a dish, but whole genome sequencing has not been employed to look for all off-target effects in living animals,” says co-author Alexander Bassuk, MD, PhD, professor of pediatrics at the University of Iowa.
In the new study, the researchers sequenced the entire genome of mice that had undergone CRISPR gene editing in the team’s previous study and looked for all mutations, including those that only altered a single nucleotide.
The researchers determined that CRISPR had successfully corrected a gene that causes blindness, but Kellie Schaefer, a PhD student in the lab of Vinit Mahajan, MD, PhD, associate professor of ophthalmology at Stanford University, and co-author of the study, found that the genomes of two independent gene therapy recipients had sustained more than 1,500 single-nucleotide mutations and more than 100 larger deletions and insertions. None of these DNA mutations were predicted by computer algorithms that are widely used by researchers to look for off-target effects.
“Researchers who aren’t using whole genome sequencing to find off-target effects may be missing potentially important mutations,” Dr. Tsang says. “Even a single nucleotide change can have a huge impact.”
Dr. Bassuk says the researchers didn’t notice anything obviously wrong with their animals. “We’re still upbeat about CRISPR,” says Dr. Mahajan. “We’re physicians, and we know that every new therapy has some potential side effects–but we need to be aware of what they are.”
Researchers are currently working to improve the components of the CRISPR system–its gene-cutting enzyme and the RNA that guides the enzyme to the right gene–to increase the efficiency of editing.
“We hope our findings will encourage others to use whole-genome sequencing as a method to determine all the off-target effects of their CRISPR techniques and study different versions for the safest, most accurate editing,” Dr. Tsang says.
The Latest on: CRISPR-Cas9
- Glossier's New Makeup Remover Literally Melted Off My Waterproof Mascara on February 20, 2019 at 9:41 am
Yet, predictably, the brand’s signature millennial pink bubble packaging kept catching my eye (it is Instagram bait, after all), so I decided to ... and only two swipes on each brow to remove my eyebr... […]
- Bug Bombs May Be More Dangerous to You Than the Cockroaches You Want to Kill on January 30, 2019 at 10:38 am
DeVries and his team solicited the participation of 30 residential homes with documented cockroach infestations and used gel bait traps in 10 of them. For the rest, researchers used total release ... […]
- Bug Bombs Suck at Killing Roaches, and They Can Make You Sick on January 29, 2019 at 4:35 pm
In a real-world test, the study found that several bug bomb brands did nothing to eliminate cockroach infestations, especially when compared to simple gel bait traps. At the same time, these bombs als... […]
- Bug bombs do a crummy job of killing cockroaches, study finds on January 28, 2019 at 5:55 am
"In a cost-benefit analysis, you're getting all costs and no benefits." In follow up tests, scientists tested two different gel baits -- one commercially available and the other professional-grade -- ... […]
- ‘Bug Bombs’ Ineffective Killing Roaches Indoors on January 27, 2019 at 9:15 pm
Meanwhile, the researchers treated 10 additional homes with either a commercially available gel bait or a professional-grade gel bait. Gel baits are generally applied in small dabs via syringe, so the... […]
via Google News and Bing News