A system composed of two different types of nanoparticles can be used to accurately, sensitively and quickly detect viruses.
The earlier a viral infection is detected, the more effective the treatment. Currently available tests are accurate but require a long time and/or specialized personnel, which are not a given in many outbreak settings. To address this, a team of researchers from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University developed a biosensor that detects Ebola and avian influenza subtype H7 viruses.
The team prepared gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) carrying ‘probes’ derived from the viral sample being tested. They also tagged ‘upconversion nanoparticles’ (UCNPs), which emit green light when hit by a near infrared laser, with probes specific for influenza virus H7 or Ebola. If the sample contains one of the two viruses, the two types of nanoparticles interact, causing the green light emitted by the laser-targeted UCNPs to dim. This process takes place in a short period of time (two hours in the case of the influenza test) and is quantifiable.
The system has proven to be very specific: using viral samples on the AuNPs that were only slightly different from the UCNP viral-specific tags did not yield results. The researchers then anchored the nanoparticles on a nanoporous alumina platform instead of having the two components in liquid solution. This increased the sensitivity of the assay and enabled the detection of ‘femtomolar’ amounts of virus: equivalent to the lower limit of detection in tests currently used in clinical practice. This is a crucial level of sensitivity, especially in the case of Ebola where early treatment can save lives.
The team is now planning to test the device on various subtypes of influenza and then move on to the fabrication of a multi-target detection platform that can simultaneously detect various subtypes of influenza viruses. The system is still at the research and development stage, but the researchers think it may become available in two to three years.
Learn more: Using nanoparticles to detect deadly viruses
The Latest on: Virus detection
- Forget Viruses or Spyware—Your Biggest Cyberthreat Is Greedy Cryptocurrency Miners on January 20, 2018 at 5:50 pm
Another piece of cryptojacking malware, called Cryptoloot ... of cryptomining software installed on servers and websites that some rule-based threat detection tools wouldn’t spot. Hear more about Bitcoin from the experts at the Business of Blockchain ... […]
- Why Prediction Should Be Added To The NIST Cybersecurity Framework on January 20, 2018 at 4:31 pm
Detection Requires Visibility Larson told me that “detection is a response to the limited visibility people had with antivirus solutions.” Antivirus protected your endpoints, but in the event of an attack, it couldn’t answer vital questions like ... […]
- UK’s NCSC catches Turla’s new in-memory ‘Neuron’ malware for attacking Windows on January 18, 2018 at 3:27 pm
Read more GCHQ: change your passwords now even if Uber says it contained the breach The in-memory modification most likely will allow it evade detection during antivirus disk scans, however NCSC reckons antivirus that scans memory will still likely be able ... […]
- Federal Circuit says Finjan virus-screening method not abstract, is patent eligible on January 17, 2018 at 12:00 am
Perhaps more remarkable, the claims of the ‘844 patent relate to virus-screening and were determined to be ... well as known viruses that have been cosmetically modified to avoid detection. This allows for “more flexible and nuanced” virus filtering ... […]
- Avira Antivirus Pro review: Great performance, but the free version is probably sufficient on January 12, 2018 at 1:36 pm
Avira is deemed a top performer by third-party security testing firms. A-V Test said Avira had a 99 percent detection rate for 0-day and malware attacks based on 202 samples. Malware detection, meanwhile, was at 100 percent based on more than 10,000 samples. […]
via Google News and Bing News