The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Crowd wisdom such as what might arise from online voting is popularly assumed to provide better answers than any one person by aggregating multiple perspectives. Democratic methods, however, tend to favor the most popular information, not necessarily the most correct. The ignorance of the masses can cancel out a knowledgeable minority with specialized information of a topic, resulting in the wrong answer becoming the most accepted.
To give more weight to correct information that may not be widely known, researchers from Princeton University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed what they call the “surprisingly popular” algorithm. Reported in the journal Nature Jan. 25, the technique hinges on asking people two things about a given question: What do they think the right answer is, and how popular do they think each answer will be?
The correct answer is that which is more popular than people predict, the researchers report. The technique could refine wisdom-of-crowds surveys, which are used in political and economic forecasting, as well as many other collective activities, from pricing artwork to grading scientific research proposals.
The researchers tested their algorithm through multiple surveys conducted on various populations. In one test, they asked people a yes-or-no question, Is Philadelphia the capital of Pennsylvania? Respondents also were asked to predict the prevalence of “yes” votes. Because Philadelphia is a “large, historically significant city,” most people in the group thought that, yes, it is the capital of Pennsylvania — Harrisburg is in fact the state’s capital. In addition, the people who mistakenly thought Philadelphia is the state capital also predicted that a very high percentage of people would answer “yes.”
Meanwhile, a certain number of respondents knew that the correct answer is “no.” But these people also anticipated that many other people would incorrectly think the capital is Philadelphia, so they also expected a very high percentage of “yes” answers. Thus, almost everyone expected other people to answer “yes,” but the actual percentage of people who did was significantly lower. “No” was the surprisingly popular answer because it exceeded expectations of what the answer would be.
Sebastian Seung, Princeton’s Evnin Professor in Neuroscience and professor of computer science and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, said that the surprisingly popular, or SP, method is still democratic because there is no expectation of who would have specialized information, only that the information exists. Seung added that the researchers’ work was published 110 years after Nature published the seminal paper in crowd wisdom, Sir Francis Galton’s 1907 study “The Wisdom of Crowds.”
“The SP method is elitist in the sense that it tries to identify those who have expert knowledge,” Seung said. “However, it is democratic in the sense that potentially anyone could be identified as an expert. The method does not look at anyone’s resume or academic degrees.”
The researchers developed their method mathematically then applied it through surveys on multiple groups of people, including U.S. state capitals, general knowledge, medical diagnoses and art auction estimates.
Across all topics, the researchers found that the “surprisingly popular” algorithm reduced errors by 21.3 percent compared to simple majority votes, and by 24.2 percent compared to basic confidence-weighted votes (where people express how confident they are in their answers). It also reduced errors by 22.2 percent compared to answers with the highest average confidence levels. On the 50 test questions related to state capitals — such as the Harrisburg-Philadelphia question — the SP method reduced incorrect decisions by 48 percent compared to the majority vote.
“The argument in this paper, in a very rough sense, is that people who expect to be in the minority deserve some extra attention,” said co-author Drazen Prelec, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management as well as of economics and brain and cognitive sciences. “In situations where there is enough information in the crowd to determine the correct answer to a question, that answer will be the one [that] most outperforms expectations.”
Aurelien Baillon, a professor of economics at Erasmus University in Rotterdam who is familiar with the new paper but had no role in it, said that the researchers’ work “opens up completely new ways to think about an old problem.” The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Receive an email update when we add a new CROWD WISDOM article.
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
via Google News
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
- Cardi B Talks Kulture's Style and How She's Teaching Her Unwavering Confidence to Her Daughter on November 15, 2018 at 9:57 am
Much of the crowd that had congregated outside of the makeshift club ... But I guess it's my personality, the way I walk in and smile, the way I talk." She's now sharing that wisdom and self-esteem wi... […]
- MHS' Wilson signs National Letter of Intent to wrestle at Nebraska in front of 'village' on November 15, 2018 at 8:33 am
Gonzales read Wilson’s bio to the crowd, In it, Wilson thanked coaches, practice partners, family and friends. He also sprinkled in some wisdom. “The wins and losses don’t mean anything ... […]
- Suicide Survivor Calls For The Wisdom of the Crowd…! on November 15, 2018 at 5:23 am
CALGARY, AB / ACCESSWIRE / November 15, 2018 / We are hearing about murder/suicides more and more frequently. So suicide is taking more than one life at a time now! One life lost to suicide is too man... […]
- Investors ask Ford about wisdom of train station and scooter purchases on November 15, 2018 at 4:54 am
Investors ask Ford about wisdom of train station and scooter purchases Ford outlines ... Hinrichs responded, "It's an important part of mobility strategy." He faced a skeptical crowd from the start. A... […]
- Harris Hines: A man of wisdom, intellect and most of all, kindness on November 13, 2018 at 3:21 pm
His wisdom, his kindness and his laughter will be sorely missed ... always that soft voice in my ear when it came to choosing right from wrong.” A capacity crowd packed the sanctuary, prompting the Ma... […]
- Fighting terror with instinct and wisdom on November 12, 2018 at 2:31 am
And so it was in central Melbourne last Friday, as the fight, freeze or flee response swept a crowd witnessing a reportedly mentally ill, deranged Islamist extremist originally from Somalia setting hi... […]
- Blubaugh: Voting based on the 'wisdom' of crowds on November 11, 2018 at 2:06 am
So when the big day — Election Day — finally arrived Tuesday, I dutifully jumped into my car, drove to my polling place, trudged through the rain saying hellos to a handful of local candidates, walked ... […]
- Geeks Vs Loneliness: finding your crowd on November 9, 2018 at 6:50 am
They are the amalgamation of the effort of writers, artists, actors, and so much more, all to entertain, and maybe impart a little wisdom along the way. It was through this realisation that I discover... […]
- Q&A on the Book Code With the Wisdom of the Crowd on November 8, 2018 at 5:14 am
Mob programming is a form of collaborative programming where a group of people work together at a single machine to solve a problem together. There are some basic structures to mob programming that ca... […]
via Bing News