The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Crowd wisdom such as what might arise from online voting is popularly assumed to provide better answers than any one person by aggregating multiple perspectives. Democratic methods, however, tend to favor the most popular information, not necessarily the most correct. The ignorance of the masses can cancel out a knowledgeable minority with specialized information of a topic, resulting in the wrong answer becoming the most accepted.
To give more weight to correct information that may not be widely known, researchers from Princeton University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed what they call the “surprisingly popular” algorithm. Reported in the journal Nature Jan. 25, the technique hinges on asking people two things about a given question: What do they think the right answer is, and how popular do they think each answer will be?
The correct answer is that which is more popular than people predict, the researchers report. The technique could refine wisdom-of-crowds surveys, which are used in political and economic forecasting, as well as many other collective activities, from pricing artwork to grading scientific research proposals.
The researchers tested their algorithm through multiple surveys conducted on various populations. In one test, they asked people a yes-or-no question, Is Philadelphia the capital of Pennsylvania? Respondents also were asked to predict the prevalence of “yes” votes. Because Philadelphia is a “large, historically significant city,” most people in the group thought that, yes, it is the capital of Pennsylvania — Harrisburg is in fact the state’s capital. In addition, the people who mistakenly thought Philadelphia is the state capital also predicted that a very high percentage of people would answer “yes.”
Meanwhile, a certain number of respondents knew that the correct answer is “no.” But these people also anticipated that many other people would incorrectly think the capital is Philadelphia, so they also expected a very high percentage of “yes” answers. Thus, almost everyone expected other people to answer “yes,” but the actual percentage of people who did was significantly lower. “No” was the surprisingly popular answer because it exceeded expectations of what the answer would be.
Sebastian Seung, Princeton’s Evnin Professor in Neuroscience and professor of computer science and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, said that the surprisingly popular, or SP, method is still democratic because there is no expectation of who would have specialized information, only that the information exists. Seung added that the researchers’ work was published 110 years after Nature published the seminal paper in crowd wisdom, Sir Francis Galton’s 1907 study “The Wisdom of Crowds.”
“The SP method is elitist in the sense that it tries to identify those who have expert knowledge,” Seung said. “However, it is democratic in the sense that potentially anyone could be identified as an expert. The method does not look at anyone’s resume or academic degrees.”
The researchers developed their method mathematically then applied it through surveys on multiple groups of people, including U.S. state capitals, general knowledge, medical diagnoses and art auction estimates.
Across all topics, the researchers found that the “surprisingly popular” algorithm reduced errors by 21.3 percent compared to simple majority votes, and by 24.2 percent compared to basic confidence-weighted votes (where people express how confident they are in their answers). It also reduced errors by 22.2 percent compared to answers with the highest average confidence levels. On the 50 test questions related to state capitals — such as the Harrisburg-Philadelphia question — the SP method reduced incorrect decisions by 48 percent compared to the majority vote.
“The argument in this paper, in a very rough sense, is that people who expect to be in the minority deserve some extra attention,” said co-author Drazen Prelec, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management as well as of economics and brain and cognitive sciences. “In situations where there is enough information in the crowd to determine the correct answer to a question, that answer will be the one [that] most outperforms expectations.”
Aurelien Baillon, a professor of economics at Erasmus University in Rotterdam who is familiar with the new paper but had no role in it, said that the researchers’ work “opens up completely new ways to think about an old problem.” The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Receive an email update when we add a new CROWD WISDOM article.
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
via Google News
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
- Refined by fire: How brutal challenges at Cornell forged strength and wisdom in me on December 16, 2018 at 9:22 pm
Most of my peers would agree on some liberal policy, and I would be the sole dissenter, defending my views against a hostile crowd. Sometimes I even changed a few minds, but the emotional toll was tax... […]
- Winter Commencement: Surprises, celebration and moving on to that ‘adult thing’ on December 16, 2018 at 1:30 pm
“It is not always easy to view difficult and painful experiences in your life as opportunities, but I hope you will remember that these are often the places where wisdom begins,” Blank said. The crowd ... […]
- WATCH: Basra police disperse crowd with tear gas as protests intensify on December 14, 2018 at 10:23 am
The nominee is believed to be a member of the al-Hikma (Wisdom) movement, led by cleric Ammar al-Hakim ... some of which claimed that protesters also threw rocks at riot police. Later, crowds scramble... […]
- Big K.R.I.T Provides Wisdom to Attendees During Hip Hop Weekly Holiday Party on December 14, 2018 at 9:49 am
As the guest of honor, Big K.R.I.T. took part in a discussion where he imparted words of key wisdom on the crowd of attendees. “Creativity and art is a very beautiful way to express yourself ... […]
- Trump, a global loner, finds his China trade war complaints draw a crowd on December 14, 2018 at 8:52 am
Despite his reputation as a global loner, Trump’s views on China are becoming the conventional wisdom. Last month, as the president prepared to travel to Buenos Aires for an international summit and d... […]
- Wisdom of The Crowd: Gameweek 17 on December 14, 2018 at 12:26 am
Each week we will be reviewing the aggregated predictions on Superbru’s Premier League Predictor game, using the collective Wisdom of the Crowd predictions to guide our fantasy football thinking. Plea... […]
- Experts Say Things Are OK, But Crowd Sending Very Different Message on December 13, 2018 at 8:30 am
This phenomenon of the crowd outsmarting the expert was well documented in James Surowiecki’s 2004 book The Wisdom of Crowd, and is shown to extend well beyond the world of game shows. […]
- Wisdom Teeth Extractions - Emergencies Welcome on December 12, 2018 at 1:29 pm
Although, more often than not, they are misaligned and require extraction. Poor alignment of wisdom teeth can crowd or damage adjacent teeth, the jawbone, or nerves. It is very common for wisdom ... […]
- Wisdom of the Crowd Could Be Ideal Model to Teach AI on December 12, 2018 at 3:46 am
We are all familiar with some of the internet’s largest crowdsourcing experiments, like Wikipedia and Amazon Mechanical Turk. But, crowdsourcing today is being applied to new, high technologies, like ... […]
via Bing News