The EPA must act swiftly to evaluate the possible health risks of nanotechnology
A decade ago the great worry about nanotechnology was that it could quite literally destroy the planet. As Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy warned in his essay “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us,” self-assembling nanobots could potentially spread out of our control (Mis-)programmed to replicate ad infinitum, these subsentient bots would spread across the landscape as a gray goo of devastation, consuming the earth and every unlucky creature who called it home.
Nowadays we can only wish that our planet-dooming scenarios were so far-fetched. Our existential worries revolve around the all too immediate problems of global warming and disease, and nanotechnology—incorporated into improved solar panels, wind turbines or drug delivery mechanisms—could, if anything, emerge as an important tool to fight these threats.
Yet like any new technology, nanomaterials carry with them potential both for good and for harm. The most salient worries concern not a gray goo apocalypse but rather the more prosaic and likely possibility that some of these novel materials may turn out to be hazardous to our health or the environment. Because ordinary materials display unique properties at the nanoscale, the nanometer-size bits of a seemingly benign material might turn out to be noxious. As John D. Young and Jan Martel report in “The Rise and Fall of Nanobacteria,” even naturally occurring nanoparticulates can have an deleterious effect on the human body. If natural nanoparticulates can harm us, we would be wise to carefully consider the possible actions of engineered nanomaterials. The size of nanoparticles also means that they can more readily escape into the environment and infiltrate deep into internal organs such as the lungs and liver. Adding to the concern, each nanomaterial is unique. Although researchers have conducted a number of studies on the health risks of individual materials, this scattershot approach cannot provide a comprehensive picture of the hazards—quantitative data on what materials, in what concentrations, affect the body over what timescales.
In response to this uncertainty, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently announced a grand research strategy to study the health and environmental effects of nanomaterials, a welcome step that many have been advocating for years. We hope that the program will help build a robust database that will give policy makers and the public the facts needed to understand the possible health risks that specific nanomaterials might create. And although it would be unwise to rush careful research efforts, speed is paramount. According to the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, more than 1,000 consumer products containing nanomaterials are available in the U.S., a number that is quickly growing.
First published on Dec 28, 2009
The Latest on: Possible health risks of nanotechnology
via Google News
The Latest on: Possible health risks of nanotechnology
- 5 Possible Weird Effects of the Texas Anti-Health Law Ruling on December 17, 2018 at 11:49 am
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. The big federal health law ruling in Texas has put a new spotlight on an old problem: Policymakers are attacking and defending the ... […]
- New Blog Looks at Potential Nanotechnology Risks on November 6, 2018 at 4:00 pm
Maynard, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies chief scientist, will be a regular contributor to the blog and will explore the many facets of ... and consultancy concerning the potential risks to the e... […]
- Advantages & Disadvantages of Nanotechnology on July 18, 2018 at 10:24 pm
Potential disadvantages include economic disruption and possible threats to security, privacy, health and the ... will be some negative effects on the environment as potential new toxins and pollutant... […]
- The Strategic Risk of Nanotechnology on January 22, 2018 at 4:00 pm
There has been much talk and hand-wringing about health and environmental risks associated with nanotechnology ... views nanotechnology as a looming issue. Lloyd's Emerging Risks Team just issued a re... […]
- We don’t talk much about nanotechnology risks anymore, but that doesn’t mean they’re gone on March 29, 2016 at 3:29 am
The worries that even nanotech proponents had in the early 2000s about possible health and environmental ... to public interest in possible nanotech risks? It could be argued that maybe investment in ... […]
- Small Packages on May 20, 2014 at 9:55 am
Although there have been other instances where engineered nanoparticles have been suspected of causing ill health ... s good news for nanotechnology safety. But it will only stay good as long as the s... […]
- Hyperbolic Reporting on Nanotechnology in Food Wreaks Havoc on December 7, 2012 at 2:33 pm
I wonder if over 250 years of mankind eating mayonnaise passes the long-term-health-risk test? Two years ago, the UK government's House of Lords Science and Technology Committee decided they were goin... […]
- Scientists: Nanotech-based products offer great potential but unknown risks on July 11, 2012 at 10:58 am
But the development of applications for nanotechnology ... unexpected risks to human health and the environment, according to scientific literature on the subject. "We haven't characterized these mate... […]
- Report on Potential Risks of Nanotechnology in Electronics Needs a Second Draft on March 16, 2011 at 5:06 am
The latest insult to our collective intelligence is their white paper entitled “Nanotechnology in Electronics: The Risk to Human Health”. Let’s take a look at it. It starts out with a definition of na... […]
- More Federal Research Sought on EHS Risks of Nanotechnology on January 18, 2009 at 4:00 pm
The U.S. House Science and Technology Committee has introduced a bill that seeks to boost federal research on potential environmental, health, and safety risks ... for understanding and managing EHS r... […]
via Bing News