The EPA must act swiftly to evaluate the possible health risks of nanotechnology
A decade ago the great worry about nanotechnology was that it could quite literally destroy the planet. As Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy warned in his essay “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us,” self-assembling nanobots could potentially spread out of our control (Mis-)programmed to replicate ad infinitum, these subsentient bots would spread across the landscape as a gray goo of devastation, consuming the earth and every unlucky creature who called it home.
Nowadays we can only wish that our planet-dooming scenarios were so far-fetched. Our existential worries revolve around the all too immediate problems of global warming and disease, and nanotechnology—incorporated into improved solar panels, wind turbines or drug delivery mechanisms—could, if anything, emerge as an important tool to fight these threats.
Yet like any new technology, nanomaterials carry with them potential both for good and for harm. The most salient worries concern not a gray goo apocalypse but rather the more prosaic and likely possibility that some of these novel materials may turn out to be hazardous to our health or the environment. Because ordinary materials display unique properties at the nanoscale, the nanometer-size bits of a seemingly benign material might turn out to be noxious. As John D. Young and Jan Martel report in “The Rise and Fall of Nanobacteria,” even naturally occurring nanoparticulates can have an deleterious effect on the human body. If natural nanoparticulates can harm us, we would be wise to carefully consider the possible actions of engineered nanomaterials. The size of nanoparticles also means that they can more readily escape into the environment and infiltrate deep into internal organs such as the lungs and liver. Adding to the concern, each nanomaterial is unique. Although researchers have conducted a number of studies on the health risks of individual materials, this scattershot approach cannot provide a comprehensive picture of the hazards—quantitative data on what materials, in what concentrations, affect the body over what timescales.
In response to this uncertainty, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently announced a grand research strategy to study the health and environmental effects of nanomaterials, a welcome step that many have been advocating for years. We hope that the program will help build a robust database that will give policy makers and the public the facts needed to understand the possible health risks that specific nanomaterials might create. And although it would be unwise to rush careful research efforts, speed is paramount. According to the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, more than 1,000 consumer products containing nanomaterials are available in the U.S., a number that is quickly growing.
First published on Dec 28, 2009
The Latest on: Possible health risks of nanotechnology
via Google News
The Latest on: Possible health risks of nanotechnology
- The iPhone 12 Ships Without a Charger. Will It Curb E-Waste?on October 14, 2020 at 4:00 am
Apple’s decision to skip the charger and EarPods sounds like a step that would reduce the company's environmental footprint. But it’s not that simple.
- Covid Masks Go Science Fiction with Nanotechnologyon October 6, 2020 at 9:40 pm
Initially, the WHO discouraged the use of face masks as a preventative measure against contracting the coronavirus. Now, they are widely accepted and in many parts of the world, including here in ...
- Nanotech + IoT Brings Exciting Possibilitieson October 6, 2020 at 11:03 am
A “nanomachine” is nanotechnology’s basic functional unit, “able to perform simple tasks such as sensing or actuation.” What intrigued me was that it would be feasible( once the research had evolved ...
- Modifiable Health Risks Linked to more than $730 Billion in US Health Care Costson September 30, 2020 at 4:04 am
since unmanaged risk factors often lead to more serious health conditions later in life. While we can't draw conclusions about possible reductions in spending from this research, the findings ...
- Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market 2020 - Market Share, Top Countries Analysis & Top manufacturers, Globally Market Size and Forecast to 2026on September 20, 2020 at 11:59 pm
Nanotechnology in Medical Devices provides details by vendors, including company overview, company total revenue (financials), market potential, global presence,Nanotechnology in Medical Devices ...
- Healthcare Nanotechnology Market Size to accrue $ 257080 million by 2025on September 15, 2020 at 9:57 pm
A gist of these driving factors, in tandem with myriad other dynamics pertaining to the Healthcare Nanotechnology market, such as the risks that are prevalent across this industry as well as the ...
- Ten things you should know about nanotechnologyon August 18, 2020 at 4:32 am
The environmental, health, and safety (EHS ... One term you hear quite often in discussion about the potential risks of nanotechnology is precautionary principle. This moral and political principle, ...
- Nanotechnology in Foodon August 15, 2020 at 1:55 pm
Let's take a look at the potentially beneficial effects nanotechnology-enabled innovations ... Nanotechnology also has the potential to improve food processes that use enzymes to confer nutrition and ...
- Why are nanoparticles so useful? - OCR 21Con July 25, 2020 at 9:11 pm
The small size of nanoparticles means that it is possible that they can penetrate into the body. This could bring medical benefits but it could also be a risk to human health. Nanotechnology does ...
- Taming Nanotechnology's Potential Riskson December 20, 2019 at 1:47 pm
But understanding the potential risks and courtroom implications can help manufacturers ... one of the wonder materials of the new age of nanotechnology, may carry a health risk similar to that of ...
via Bing News