It’s difficult to express how important and worthwhile analysis this is.
Chris Tolles points us to what I have to say is an absolute must read piece by Jim Manzi (who I haven’t always agreed with in the past), exploring the biggest challenge the US faces in going forward. It’s difficult to express how important and worthwhile analysis this is. I don’t agree with everything, but it frames the issues in ways that are incredibly helpful. There’s very little I disagree with in the first half, which highlights the basic struggle that the US faces in really clear terms: innovation is necessary for economic growth, and less government interference is key for the type of innovation we need. However, with such innovation comes social upheaval and disruption that creates a different set of problems that could be just as bad for the US:
First is the inherent conflict between the creative destruction involved in free-market capitalism and the innate human propensity to avoid risk and change. Second is ever-increasing international competition. And third is the growing disparity in behavioral norms and social conditions between the upper and lower income strata of American society.
These realities combine to form a daunting problem. And the task of resolving it turns out not, by and large, to be a matter of foreign policy. Rather, it compels us to consider how we balance economic dynamism and growth against the unity and stability of our society. After all, we must have continuous, rapid technological and business-model innovation to grow our economy fast enough to avoid losing power to those who do not share America’s values — and this innovation requires increasingly deregulated markets and fewer restrictions on behavior. But such deregulation would cause significant displacement and disruption that could seriously undermine America’s social cohesion — which is not only essential to a decent and just society, but also to producing the kind of skilled and responsible citizens that free markets ultimately require. Moreover, preserving the integrity of our social fabric by minimizing the divisions that can rend society often requires government policies — to reduce inequality or ensure access to jobs, education, housing, or health care — that can in turn undercut growth and prosperity. Neither innovation nor cohesion can do without the other, but neither, it seems, can avoid undermining the other.
There’s a lot in the piece that I wanted to quote, but you should just go read the whole thing yourself. Manzi basically points out the difficulty in pulling any of the levers: if you increase the pace of innovation, you also increase social upheaval at the lower end of the pyramid. But if you work to protect social upheaval, you decrease the pace of innovation, and in a global economy, that can actually lead to another set of problems that, in turn, also could result in serious problems for the economy.
It’s a really sobering picture that is inherently non-partisan, and highlights how the views and plans of both major political parties, when implemented by people who don’t understand these countervailing forces, is likely to make the overall situation worse, not better.
The Latest on: Innovation and social upheaval
via Google News
The Latest on: Innovation and social upheaval
- CANDIDATE ESSAY: Scott Comegys, 130th Assembly Districton October 17, 2020 at 6:00 am
Listening to how representatives for the 130th Assembly District vote and their objections to work done in the state government gives the impression that the people of Cayuga, Oswego, and ...
- This School Was Built for Idealists. It Could Use Some Rich Alumni.on October 16, 2020 at 2:03 am
For the past century, the New School produced iconoclastic thinkers. Now it is finding that idealism is very expensive.
- Luxury in the new normal: Leadership and innovation in 2020 and beyondon October 16, 2020 at 1:56 am
As fashion brands adapt and survive, they can drive a renewed vision of how to decouple volume growth from value growth.
- Book review: ‘Right/Wrong – How Technology Transforms Our Ethics’on October 14, 2020 at 5:30 am
But TED speaker Juan Enriquez argues that one of the biggest drivers of ethical upheaval and change is technology ... linked to the evolution of innovation and technology, changes our own ethics. This ...
- Hispanic Heritage Month events at UTSA to wrap up this weekon October 11, 2020 at 11:40 pm
From the history and contributions of the Hispanic community to their strength and resiliency, for the next month the Hispanic community is being recognized as part of National Hispanic Heritage Month ...
- Endorsement: Pennsylvania needs Joe Bidenon October 11, 2020 at 2:16 am
From COVID-19 to the environment to racial justice, Donald Trump has failed. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris can set us on a new course. The stakes for Pennsylvanians could not be higher.
- Extremism Researcher On Prevalence Of Militia Groups In The Pandemicon October 9, 2020 at 1:08 pm
Idriss, who runs the Polarization and Extremism Research & Innovation Lab at American University, about the growth of right-wing militia groups in 2020.
- How ‘hyperlocal’ journalism can restore trust in the mediaon October 9, 2020 at 7:30 am
Their stories could help restore public trust in journalism – but only if the government puts its money where its mouth is, and helps to fund them. According to the Independent Community News Network ...
- Innovation amid crisis: Social Enterprise Summit invites young changemakers to envision how cities can stay resilient in the ‘new normal’on October 8, 2020 at 8:00 am
[sponsored] Political crises, social upheaval, environmental disasters and the global ... solutions in areas including “Community Empowerment”; “Digital Social Innovation”; “Sustainability and ...
- Is Your Executive Compensation Plan Undermining Your Mission?on October 8, 2020 at 6:33 am
Executive compensation, however, has not changed accordingly. Even as industries are restructuring, most executives operate within standardized pay plan parameters that can hinder creativity. Metrics ...
via Bing News