Giant pandas. Self-fertilizing plants. People.
Lots of species have been proposed as “evolutionary dead ends” (though whether they actually are is another question). And now added to those ranks might be science itself.
A new paper has argued that science appears to be in something of an evolutionary cul-de-sac, mired in poor methodology and misguided objectives that have changed only for the worse over the past 60 years. Indeed, science is doing pretty much what it has evolved to do — produce a steady stream of plausible and attention-grabbing but frequently false findings.
At least, that’s what a pair of researchers at the University of California, Davis, said in their new paper, titled “The Natural Selection of Bad Science.” The authors, Paul Smaldino and Richard McElreath, argued that “some of the most powerful incentives in contemporary science actively encourage, reward, and propagate poor research methods and abuse of statistical procedures.”
Smaldino and McElreath, who posted their article on the preprint server arXiv, meaning it has not yet been through peer review, noted that the behavioral sciences in particular fail to produce statistically rigorous studies. The term of art here is “power” — an indication of the ability of an analysis to detect the outcomes it purports to find. And, according to Smaldino and McElreath, “despite over 50 years of reviews of low statistical power and its consequences, there has been no detectable increase” in the average power of studies.
Why the lack of improvement? The UC Davis researchers, like many others, believe that science is simply behaving the way it has evolved to behave: as a publishing factory. “An incentive structure that rewards publication quantity will, in the absence of countervailing forces, select for methods that produce the greatest number of publishable results. This in turn will lead to the natural selection of poor methods and increasingly high false discovery rates.” Sticking with the Darwinian metaphor, Smaldino and McElreath said that successful labs churn out “progeny” — grad students, junior faculty, future lab heads — that mimic their approach.
And the evolutionary metaphor is telling in another way. Evolutionary theory talks about the presence of “cheaters” in any population, but Smaldino and McElreath pointed out that the influence of such cheaters is even more insidious than one would think. For example, cheaters may invent ways to game the system, but others are quickly forced to mimic their methods, lest they be left behind.
The Latest on: Bad science
via Google News
The Latest on: Bad science
- The Scientist Fighting The Dumbest Kind Of Bad Science Reporting On Twitter on April 18, 2019 at 5:30 am
Late last week, a Twitter account highlighting one of the cardinal sins of bad science journalism popped up online, catching the eye of scientists, reporters, and the public: @justsaysinmice. The ... […]
- Column | Why are we so bad at science? on April 7, 2019 at 7:27 pm
What do most Americans know about science? If a March 28 Pew Research Center poll is to be believed – not nearly enough. And at a time when knowledge and facts are under assault as they have not ... […]
- Micek: Why are we so bad at science? on April 5, 2019 at 10:21 pm
What do most Americans know about science? If a March 28 Pew Research Center poll is to be believed — not nearly enough. And at a time when knowledge and facts are under assault as they have not been ... […]
- Fining one ‘predatory’ publisher won’t fix the problem of bad science in journals on April 5, 2019 at 2:33 am
Science publishers aren’t supposed to be in the disinformation business. And that’s precisely what a federal judge in Nevada was saying late last month when she slapped OMICS International with a $50 ... […]
- Sweden's Small Feet Premieres BAD SCIENCE Video via Billboard, New Album Out Tomorrow on March 28, 2019 at 2:07 pm
In anticipation of the upcoming release of With Psychic Powers, the sophomore effort from Swedish artist Small Feet out tomorrow on Barsuk Records, Billboard is premiering the video for the track "Bad ... […]
- Small Feet Shares 'Bad Science' Video From Upcoming 'With Psychic Powers': Premiere on March 28, 2019 at 12:29 pm
Small Feet's video for "Bad Science," premiering below from the Swedish act's sophomore album With Psychic Powers, is not exactly what group leader Simon Stalhamre intended. Stalhamre had initially ... […]
- Bad science creates fictional insects on February 21, 2019 at 9:02 pm
I have always loved reading and watching both science fiction and fantasy. I can easily suspend disbelief and enjoy dragons, wizards and the like because they obviously do not exist, but I have no ... […]
- Bullied Into Bad Science? on January 20, 2019 at 3:03 pm
Today, I was made aware of a site called Bullied Into Bad Science which aims to tackle this problem. Founded by behavioral ecologist Corina Logan, the initiative aims to help early career researchers ... […]
- Turns out the science saying screen time is bad isn’t science on January 14, 2019 at 4:08 pm
A new study is making waves in the worlds of tech and psychology by questioning the basis of thousands of papers and analyses with conflicting conclusions on the effect of screen time on well-being. ... […]
- 7 bad science and health ideas that should die with 2018 on December 26, 2018 at 4:41 am
If you’re a science enthusiast who has followed the news in 2018, you probably noted a few moments when science got the shaft. Yet in 2018, scientists also helped us get a better handle on the truth ... […]
via Bing News