Giant pandas. Self-fertilizing plants. People.
Lots of species have been proposed as “evolutionary dead ends” (though whether they actually are is another question). And now added to those ranks might be science itself.
A new paper has argued that science appears to be in something of an evolutionary cul-de-sac, mired in poor methodology and misguided objectives that have changed only for the worse over the past 60 years. Indeed, science is doing pretty much what it has evolved to do — produce a steady stream of plausible and attention-grabbing but frequently false findings.
At least, that’s what a pair of researchers at the University of California, Davis, said in their new paper, titled “The Natural Selection of Bad Science.” The authors, Paul Smaldino and Richard McElreath, argued that “some of the most powerful incentives in contemporary science actively encourage, reward, and propagate poor research methods and abuse of statistical procedures.”
Smaldino and McElreath, who posted their article on the preprint server arXiv, meaning it has not yet been through peer review, noted that the behavioral sciences in particular fail to produce statistically rigorous studies. The term of art here is “power” — an indication of the ability of an analysis to detect the outcomes it purports to find. And, according to Smaldino and McElreath, “despite over 50 years of reviews of low statistical power and its consequences, there has been no detectable increase” in the average power of studies.
Why the lack of improvement? The UC Davis researchers, like many others, believe that science is simply behaving the way it has evolved to behave: as a publishing factory. “An incentive structure that rewards publication quantity will, in the absence of countervailing forces, select for methods that produce the greatest number of publishable results. This in turn will lead to the natural selection of poor methods and increasingly high false discovery rates.” Sticking with the Darwinian metaphor, Smaldino and McElreath said that successful labs churn out “progeny” — grad students, junior faculty, future lab heads — that mimic their approach.
And the evolutionary metaphor is telling in another way. Evolutionary theory talks about the presence of “cheaters” in any population, but Smaldino and McElreath pointed out that the influence of such cheaters is even more insidious than one would think. For example, cheaters may invent ways to game the system, but others are quickly forced to mimic their methods, lest they be left behind.
The Latest on: Bad science
via Google News
The Latest on: Bad science
- 7 bad science and health ideas that should die with 2018 on December 31, 2018 at 6:26 am
Editor's note: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author on behalf of our content partner and do not represent the views of MSN or Microsoft Immigrants aren’t a disease risk. Nean... […]
- ‘Junk science’ goes under review on December 21, 2018 at 9:37 pm
“Several fields of forensic science are under a lot of scrutiny lately — we’re asking jurors to do a very difficult thing, and we have to provide them with the best evidence we can,” he said. “The par... […]
- 'Bad science' took away this mother's right to a normal life after falsely being convicted of murdering her son on December 21, 2018 at 6:41 am
This article is a partnership between ProPublica, where Pamela Colloff is a senior reporter, and The New York Times Magazine, where she is a writer at large. “I tucked Joel in, but I feel so guilty I ... […]
- Bad science risks lives on December 10, 2018 at 10:30 pm
Last week The Seguin Gazette published an article and an accompanying editorial about the flu vaccine and health officials urging people to get the shot before the influenza season really spikes ... […]
- 'Brainwashed: The Bad Science Behind CTE and the Plot to Destroy Football' by Merril Hoge on November 24, 2018 at 11:07 pm
From the publisher: The outcry surrounding CTE is missing something critical: the science to justify it. When post-concussion syndrome forced star NFL running back Merril Hoge into early retirement in ... […]
- When Superhero TV Shows Get Real Science Wrong, Do We Just Accept It? on November 24, 2018 at 5:01 pm
When committing to a superhero TV show, does the viewer make a pact to accept bad science as well as the inherently weird science? It’s a question that comes up now and again, and one that I often rai... […]
- Experts say teachers are being taught bad science on November 5, 2018 at 8:18 pm
Here’s a quick quiz. Rate the following statements on a scale from one to five, with one meaning you totally disagree and five meaning you wholeheartedly agree: Beginners and experts essentially think ... […]
- 'A bad science fiction movie': Florence breeds mosquitoes in North Carolina on September 27, 2018 at 11:42 am
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Robert Phillips walked onto the porch of his Eastover home Tuesday night and was almost immediately swarmed by aggressive mosquitoes. Worse yet, Phillips said, one type of mosquit... […]
- It's not that bad! Science, tourism clash on Great Barrier Reef on September 27, 2018 at 12:11 am
A row is raging over Australia's warming-damaged Great Barrier Reef, with firms worried that scientists' apocalyptic warnings are scaring visitors out of the water. Every year, more than two million s... […]
- Bad Science of the Havana Embassy “Sonic Attack” on April 7, 2018 at 5:19 am
In late 2016, staff at the US embassy in Havana, Cuba, began to report hearing unusual sounds. Over the coming months, some staff were struck down by hearing loss and concussion-like symptoms. The str... […]
via Bing News