A statement by the U.N.-convened group suggests that tinkering with the atmosphere could be necessary to meet climate goals
Attempts to counter global warming by modifying Earth’s atmosphere have been thrust into the spotlight following last week’s report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Mention of ‘geoengineering’ in the report summary was brief, but it suggests that the controversial area is now firmly on the scientific agenda. Some climate models suggest that geoengineering may even be necessary to keep global temperature rises to below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.
Most geoengineering technologies generally either reflect sunlight — through artificial ‘clouds’ of stratospheric aerosols, for example — or reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The latter approach, described as ‘negative emissions’, involves capturing carbon dioxide with strategies that range from building towers to collect it from the atmosphere to grinding up rocks to react with CO2 and take it out of circulation.
Critics say that the technologies are unproven, will have unforeseen impacts and could distract from attempts to limit emissions of greenhouse gases. But advocates point to language in the summary for policy-makers produced by the IPCC working group that assessed the scientific evidence for climate change as evidence that reducing emissions will not be enough.
The document notes that a “large fraction” of anthropogenic climate change is irreversible except with a “large net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere over a sustained period”. Under some climate models, keeping temperature rise below 2 °C will require negative emissions.
The summary reads: “Methods that aim to deliberately alter the climate system to counter climate change, termed geoengineering, have been proposed. Limited evidence precludes a comprehensive quantitative assessment of both Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and their impact on the climate system.”
Piers Forster, a climate-change researcher at the University of Leeds, UK, and one of the authors of the summary, says: “The policy relevance of the information is that if you do not start mitigating [ie reducing emissions] tomorrow we will have to start to consider these unattractive options.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Looking for Climate Solutions Down in the Dirt on April 17, 2019 at 5:17 am
Geoengineering is more than orbiting mirrors and stratospheric aerosols. Innovative modeling considers the impact of no-till farming and radical irrigation. Irrigation policies and methodologies ... […]
- Solar geoengineering: what if countries could move the earth’s thermostat? on April 16, 2019 at 10:27 pm
Solar geoengineering (also known as solar radiation management) is a technology in its infancy – and it is controversial. It has the potential to reverse or mitigate some of the global warming caused ... […]
- Longshot presidential candidate Andrew Yang thinks rogue geoengineering could cause a war. He wants the US to take the lead before it happens. on April 13, 2019 at 8:02 am
For the first time in recent memory, climate change has muscled its way into the US presidential election conversation, thanks in large part to politicians like New York Representative Alexandria ... […]
- In The Tank (ep186) – Geoengineering, Tax Freedom Day, and Lindsey Stroud on Vaping on April 12, 2019 at 4:57 pm
Heartland's Donald Kendal, and Justin Haskins are joined by Isaac Orr in episode #186 of the In The Tank Podcast. Today's episode features work from the Center of the American Experiment, the Reason ... […]
- COMMENT: Let’s talk about geoengineering on April 11, 2019 at 6:26 am
The debate about the Sun is heating up at the UN Deadlock at UN Environment Assembly in Nairobi shows it’s a complex problem without a single solution Project Syndicate | DAVID KEITH | Negotiations on ... […]
- Adding iron to oceans could increase carbon storage on April 8, 2019 at 7:08 am
“These geoengineering approaches are not solutions to the whole problem, but they are potential ways we can mitigate the worst effects.” Click here to see our subscription options. Looking for ... […]
- Geoengineering experiments to protect the Great Barrier Reef highlight the need for Australian law to catch up, research on April 8, 2019 at 5:26 am
More robust rules are needed to ensure the public acceptability of new technologies which aim to protect Australia's Great Barrier Reef from further coral bleaching due to climate change ... […]
- Legal protections urged as science gears up to aid Great Barrier Reef on April 7, 2019 at 6:00 am
So-called geoengineering to draw down carbon dioxide or mask the effect of a warming planet has begun to draw science funding, including for three projects to protect Australia's largest network of ... […]
- Shuchi Talati on April 5, 2019 at 3:35 pm
Shuchi Talati is a UCS Fellow on solar geoengineering research governance and public engagement with the Climate & Energy program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. Dr. Talati works to guide sound ... […]
- Confronting Solar Geoengineering: What You Need to Know on April 5, 2019 at 3:31 pm
Climate change threatens public health, food security, water availability, and national security – just to name a few areas of impact. Dramatic reductions in emissions and increased investments in ... […]
via Google News and Bing News