A statement by the U.N.-convened group suggests that tinkering with the atmosphere could be necessary to meet climate goals
Attempts to counter global warming by modifying Earth’s atmosphere have been thrust into the spotlight following last week’s report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Mention of ‘geoengineering’ in the report summary was brief, but it suggests that the controversial area is now firmly on the scientific agenda. Some climate models suggest that geoengineering may even be necessary to keep global temperature rises to below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.
Most geoengineering technologies generally either reflect sunlight — through artificial ‘clouds’ of stratospheric aerosols, for example — or reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The latter approach, described as ‘negative emissions’, involves capturing carbon dioxide with strategies that range from building towers to collect it from the atmosphere to grinding up rocks to react with CO2 and take it out of circulation.
Critics say that the technologies are unproven, will have unforeseen impacts and could distract from attempts to limit emissions of greenhouse gases. But advocates point to language in the summary for policy-makers produced by the IPCC working group that assessed the scientific evidence for climate change as evidence that reducing emissions will not be enough.
The document notes that a “large fraction” of anthropogenic climate change is irreversible except with a “large net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere over a sustained period”. Under some climate models, keeping temperature rise below 2 °C will require negative emissions.
The summary reads: “Methods that aim to deliberately alter the climate system to counter climate change, termed geoengineering, have been proposed. Limited evidence precludes a comprehensive quantitative assessment of both Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and their impact on the climate system.”
Piers Forster, a climate-change researcher at the University of Leeds, UK, and one of the authors of the summary, says: “The policy relevance of the information is that if you do not start mitigating [ie reducing emissions] tomorrow we will have to start to consider these unattractive options.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Negative emissions: Scientists meet in Australia to discuss removing CO2 from air on November 12, 2018 at 2:58 pm
An international group of researchers and policymakers met in Australia’s capital this week for the country’s first major conference dedicated to the topic of “negative emissions”. The two-day event, ... […]
- Nations are manipulating the weather on November 11, 2018 at 10:56 am
Canada is one of them. The perpetrators are basing their "geoengineering" activities on input from professional meteorologists, science foundations and government officials. "The consequences of meddl... […]
- The Colonial Logic of Geoengineering’s “Last Resort” on November 9, 2018 at 1:02 am
As panic starts to set in about what little time we have to avert catastrophic climate change, elites have begun in earnest to drum up support for geoengineering fixes – including the fix of injecting ... […]
- We Must Remove Carbon from the Atmosphere to Limit Climate Change: Here's How We Can Do It on November 8, 2018 at 4:27 am
This special report underscores the importance of innovations for effective carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and other geoengineering or climate engineering methods to slow down global warming. In this co... […]
- Y Combinator’s Search For a Climate Change Unicorn on November 5, 2018 at 7:00 am
An incubator that became famous for spawning internet-based unicorns like AirBnB, DropBox, and Stripe is not the most obvious vehicle for supporting next-generation geoengineering approaches. But with ... […]
- Solar geoengineering could provide 'temporary fix' on November 5, 2018 at 12:34 am
We need to consider all options if we are to keep global warming below 1.5°C - even engineering the climate. The message is simple: even if we make it to a net-zero economy, we have little chance of m... […]
- The Sea May Be Absorbing Way More Heat Than We Thought on November 1, 2018 at 9:04 am
Not only is the work important, it involves an absolute mess of variables—emissions, maybe sequestering those emissions, atmospheric patterns, maybe geoengineering that atmosphere. Data is often spars... […]
- Geoengineering could stop warming but comes with side of sea-level rise on October 31, 2018 at 8:39 am
Since we've only made moderate progress in cutting greenhouse gas emissions, climate science has turned to seriously investigating options that have typically been in the “far-fetched” category. […]
- Geoengineering Is Still Nowhere Close to Working on October 31, 2018 at 6:53 am
Scientists have established a strategic error in one version of the climate change debate: they still say geoengineering is no guarantee of a cooler world. There is no practical technology available t... […]
- Solar geoengineering may not halt ocean warming, study says on October 30, 2018 at 5:03 pm
Spraying aerosols high in the stratosphere could dampen global warming over land, but may not prevent the oceans from heating up, new research says. The findings suggest that this type of “solar geoen... […]
via Google News and Bing News