Oct 122013
 

Aluminum-Teacher-Sign-K-2633

Good teachers have a surprisingly big impact on their pupils’ future income

THERE are few policy questions to which improving the quality of education is not a reasonable answer. Yet assessing teachers is far from straightforward. Pupils’ grades or test scores may reflect any of a host of influences, not just the standard of instruction. Neither can one take for granted that good teaching, however it is measured, will translate into better lives for its recipients. In two new working papers , Raj Chetty and John Friedman of Harvard University and Jonah Rockoff of Columbia University deploy some statistical wizardry to tease out the value of teaching (see sources below). Good teachers, they find, are worth their weight in gold.

School systems often try to assess the quality of their teachers by measuring “value added”: the effect a given teacher has on pupils’ test scores. Research is divided on whether this makes sense. Critics reckon that pupils with particular backgrounds—from richer families, for instance, or with more attentive parents—wind up in classrooms with better teachers. If so, the teachers who excel in assessments of value added may simply be teaching more privileged pupils. Messrs Chetty, Friedman and Rockoff try first to settle this debate.

To do so, the economists draw on a substantial data-set from a large, urban American school district, which they do not name. It covers 20 years of results and takes in more than 2.5m pupils. The data include teacher assignments and their pupils’ test scores from third to eighth grade (ages eight to 14, roughly speaking). The authors dig into the mountain of numbers to calculate the effect each teacher has on their pupils’ performance, after adjusting for demography and previous test scores. Previous scores, they reckon, do a good job of capturing the various external influences pupils bring to the classroom, from how well-nourished they are to how good their former teachers were. The authors also control for “drift”, or the fact that more recent test scores are better reflections of a teacher’s effectiveness than older ones, perhaps because the quality of an individual’s teaching tends to change a bit over time. In the end they produce a value-added score for every teacher in their sample.

The researchers then go hunting for bias: the possibility that good teacher scores actually reflect the lucky circumstances of their pupils. Using data from income-tax records, the authors show that the characteristics of pupils’ parents, such as family income, do not generally predict how teachers perform. They also use changes in the average quality of a school’s teaching staff from year to year (from the movement of a particularly good teacher to a different school, for instance) to check their findings. When the average quality of teachers in fourth grade falls from one year to the next, for example, the performance of the fourth-graders also drops as expected.

A bias-free measure of teacher quality allows the economists to wring fascinating conclusions from their data-set. They find, for instance, that the quality of teachers varies much more within schools than among them: a typical school has teachers spanning 85% of the spectrum for the school system as a whole. Not only do teachers matter, in other words, but the best teachers are not generally clumped within particular schools.

Read more . . .

 

The Latest on: Good teachers
  • Elementary School Homework Probably Isn’t Good For Kids
    on February 25, 2018 at 5:04 pm

    “Teachers and possibly schools confuse homework with rigor ... but homework is really more of an obligation than anything. “A struggle is good when there is a success at the end of the struggle,” suggests Vatterott. “But it’s a very simplistic ... […]

  • Teens 'have raging passions' and fights, so guns in schools 'not a good idea': Florida HS teacher
    on February 25, 2018 at 6:05 am

    A Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School teacher who sheltered students in her classroom during the Feb. 14 massacre that killed 17 said arming teachers with guns is "not a good idea." Ashley Kurth, a culinary arts teacher at the high school in Parkland ... […]

  • UIS Perspectives: Good teachers are always working to be better teachers
    on February 24, 2018 at 6:11 pm

    A few weeks ago, a headline in the Chronicle of Higher Education, a widely respected weekly publication for college and university personnel, caught my eye. “What Makes a Good Teacher?” the headline read. The writer, himself a well-known author and ... […]

  • Why Arming Teachers Is a Good Idea
    on February 23, 2018 at 8:01 pm

    Evildoers can no longer storm a cockpit without fear of being shot. President Donald Trump was spot on to cite the armed pilot FFDO program as a model for a new program for teachers to protect schools. Many resist the idea of having a few trained and armed ... […]

  • NYPD Commissioner James O'Neill shoots down Trump's plan to arm teachers: 'It's not a good idea'
    on February 23, 2018 at 1:55 pm

    The city’s top cop urged President Trump to put a silencer on his call to arm America’s educators as a deterrent to the U.S. epidemic of deadly school shootings. “Let teachers teach,” declared NYPD Commissioner James O’Neill after delivering the ... […]

via Google News and Bing News

Other Interesting Posts

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: