A Case Western Reserve University professor wondered why some types of research were more apt to secure federal grants, while others—especially exploratory science—often didn’t.
Using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a case study, Assistant Philosophy Professor Chris Haufe concluded that hypothesis-based research has the edge over discovery research for several reasons that he explains in a new paper.
Haufe discusses the NIH’s peer-reviewed grant process in his Studies in History and Philosophy of Science journal article, “Why do funding agencies favor hypothesis testing?”
Hypothesis-driven research is based on scientific theories, while exploration is based on a search for discovery backed by few theories or none at all.
While looking into the types of research most often funded, Haufe shows that instructions to reviewers and applicants strongly favor hypothesis-based inquiries that are related to and relevant to current science issues.
For example, Haufe reports that the NIH guidelines for RO1 grants (described by the NIH as investigator-initiated or a response to a program announcement or request for application) to researchers advise applicants, “A strong grant application is driven by a strong, solid hypothesis with clear research objectives. The specific aims are a formal statement of objectives and milestones of the research project towards testing the hypothesis.”
The article offers two explanations why the NIH prefers hypothesis testing: The research is driven by best practices (how to do and test science), and it’s easy for peer reviewers to separate good from bad science based on the research methods.
Those with a realistic chance to prove what they set out to find and have the biggest impact for the public’s benefit tend to receive the federal research dollars, Haufe concludes.
With hypothesis testing, researchers present what the study hopes to accomplish, how it will be done and possible outcomes. Many researchers also conduct pilot studies or draw from findings by other researchers to build a strong case for future success.
Exploratory research, however, is driven more by hope and chance of discovery, Haufe writes.
Funding success also tends to take the path of least risk, Haufe explains.
Hypothesis testing takes the next step in scientific theory, having already stood the rigors of examination. Meanwhile, exploratory research examines unknown areas with no or little-known theories to back them—perceived as a riskier bet.
Haufe said the federal government, with limited funding, wants to support research where there’s a chance of success that serves both public and science interests. The closer the research is to what’s already known also improves chances of funding, he reports.
The science community has long accepted hypothesis testing.
The Latest on: Exploratory funding
- Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Raising $500 Million in Funding on December 18, 2018 at 6:07 am
Elon Musk’s rocket company, Space Exploration Technologies Corp., is set to raise $ ... SpaceX investors are paying $186 per share for new stock in the latest funding round, this person said. That is ... […]
- Oil industry funding supports campaign to roll back fuel-economy rules on December 14, 2018 at 7:59 am
Perhaps he wasn't referring to tax incentives for oil companies, such as deductions for drilling wells, depleting oil and gas deposits (including in shale formations), exploration and ... in tax reven... […]
- Partners seek funding for gas exploration in the Area 1 block in Mozambique on December 14, 2018 at 3:00 am
The process of securing funding from international banks for the project to explore natural gas deposits in the Rovuma Area 1 block in northern Mozambique has begun, the Mozambican minister of Mineral ... […]
- European development bank pulls plug on funding for coal mines on December 12, 2018 at 5:43 am
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development also announced it would stop funding oil exploration projects. It will only pay for oil development in exceptional circumstances where the investme... […]
- With federal funding for science on the decline, what's the role of a profit motive in research? on December 11, 2018 at 8:15 am
Proposed and actual funding conveys a recurring message to American academic ... History shows there’s an intrinsic value to letting people explore, because such exploration is critical to later marke... […]
- MCC receives funding for STEM career exploration program on December 10, 2018 at 8:36 am
Rochester, N.Y. (WHAM) - Monroe Community College will now have the funding to offer career exploration opportunities to Rochester city high school students. On Monday, the U.S. Department of ... […]
- Lost Ember Interview – Talking About Exploration, Narrative, and More on December 10, 2018 at 8:26 am
Lost Ember is a title that’s been pretty low-key in terms of the anticipation surrounding it so far, but everything we’ve seen of the upcoming exploration based, story-focused adventure title ... […]
- McEwen Mining announces 2019 Timmins exploration strategy and funding on December 10, 2018 at 3:26 am
McEwen Mining Inc announced a strategic financing to continue our successful ongoing exploration program at our properties in the Timmins region of Ontario. Mr Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner ... […]
- PolarX secures $1.26 million funding from share placement on December 9, 2018 at 7:09 pm
Funding will also be used to reduce helicopter support requirements for the 2019 field program, intended to significantly reduce future exploration costs. […]
- New Funding Allows Caltrain To Purchase Additional Electric Cars on December 6, 2018 at 8:13 pm
Funding from the California State Transportation ... of design alternatives to address bike security concerns and an exploration of policy considerations related to onboard and wayside bicycle ... […]
via Google News and Bing News