Further delay in the implementation of comprehensive international climate policies could substantially increase the short-term costs of climate change mitigation.
Global economic growth would be cut back by up to 7 percent within the first decade after climate policy implementation if the current international stalemate is continued until 2030 – compared to 2 percent if a climate agreement is reached by 2015 already, a study to be published next tuesday by scientists of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) shows. Higher costs would in turn increase the threshold for decision-makers to start the transition to a low-carbon economy. Thus, to keep climate targets within reach it seems to be most relevant to not further postpone mitigation, the researchers conclude.
“The transitional economic repercussions that would result if the switch towards a climate-friendly economy is delayed, are comparable to the costs of the financial crisis the world just experienced,” lead-author Gunnar Luderer says. The later climate policy implementation starts, the faster – hence the more expensive – emissions have to be reduced if states world-wide want to achieve the internationally agreed target of limiting global warming to 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels. A binding global agreement to implement the emissions reductions required to reach this target is currently still under negotiation, while global emissions have continued to rise.
“For the first time, our study quantifies the short-term costs of tiptoeing when confronted with the climate challenge,” Luderer says. “Economists tend to look at how things balance out in the long-term, but decision-makers understandably worry about additional burdens for the people and businesses they are responsible for right now. So increased short-term costs due to delaying climate policy might deter decision-makers from starting the transformation. The initial costs of climate policies thus can be more relevant than the total costs.”
Future energy price increases could be limited
The researchers investigated a number of cost dimensions, including climate policy effects on energy prices. If emissions reductions are delayed beyond 2030, global energy price levels are likely to increase by 80 percent in the short term. Such price increases are of particular concern because of the burden they put on the world’s poor. In the past, comparable energy price increases in developing countries have resulted in massive public opposition and social unrest, like in Indonesia in 1998 after a cutback of fuel subsidies. If an agreement on emissions reductions compatible with the 2 degree target is reached until 2015, short-term energy price increases could be limited to 25 percent.
The Latest on: Climate policy
- View from The Hill: Malcolm Turnbull’s home truths on the NEG help Labor in the climate wars on April 21, 2019 at 3:13 am
The consequence is no integration of energy and climate policy, uncertainty continues to discourage investment with the consequence, as I have often warned, of both higher emissions and higher ... […]
- Earth Day founder's daughter says her dad would be 'deeply distressed' by climate inaction on April 21, 2019 at 3:03 am
It was a report that had no policy advocacy in it. It was called the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts. It was simply a report compiling the best available science on climate change ... […]
- Putting California’s climate action plans to work for our communities on April 21, 2019 at 2:11 am
Locally, these efforts have been recently highlighted by Supervisor Rafael Mandelman’s leadership in pushing for San Francisco’s declaration of a climate emergency. In fact, this declaration ... […]
- ‘Climate before cash’: young Norwegians call time on oil industry on April 20, 2019 at 11:08 pm
“A stricter global climate policy may mean that this will occur sooner than foreseen earlier,” he said, though cautioned against actively forcing a downsizing of the industry. […]
- Morrison faces pressure over climate change policy on April 20, 2019 at 2:54 pm
After a week of pressuring Bill Shorten over his climate change policy Scott Morrison's coming under attack from his own side. Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull is criticising the coalition for ... […]
- Inane Climate Policies of Canadian Politicians: Paul Beckwith Speaks Out on April 20, 2019 at 12:51 pm
Idiotic, Inane Climate Policies by Canadian Politicians of all Ilks (excepting Green's) There is nothing like a family Easter trip to Toronto to get my creative rant juices flowing. I let loose about ... […]
- A climate change solution slowly gains ground on April 19, 2019 at 9:53 am
“We concluded that it was not possible to square it with our work to end fossil fuel subsidies,” said David Hawkins, director of climate policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council, which stayed ... […]
- Pressure From Above, Pressure From Below Compels Companies And Investors To Tackle Climate Change on April 19, 2019 at 7:16 am
including assessing their strategic resilience to climate change policy. Firms are encouraged to take a long-term, strategic approach to considering these risks, and to embed them into their ... […]
- Fed Policy Makers Take Notice of Climate Change’s Implications for Economic Outlook on April 18, 2019 at 10:39 am
The Federal Reserve is starting to take notice of climate change and its implications for the U.S. economic outlook. “In coming decades, climate change—and efforts to limit that change and ... […]
- What Does Climate Change Sound Like As Music? on April 18, 2019 at 5:30 am
In her TEDxSeattle talk, Twedt says, “Music can be intimate, even vulnerable, and help us understand, through rhythm and vibration, that climate change isn't simply a test problem, or a policy problem ... […]
via Google News and Bing News