Further delay in the implementation of comprehensive international climate policies could substantially increase the short-term costs of climate change mitigation.
Global economic growth would be cut back by up to 7 percent within the first decade after climate policy implementation if the current international stalemate is continued until 2030 – compared to 2 percent if a climate agreement is reached by 2015 already, a study to be published next tuesday by scientists of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) shows. Higher costs would in turn increase the threshold for decision-makers to start the transition to a low-carbon economy. Thus, to keep climate targets within reach it seems to be most relevant to not further postpone mitigation, the researchers conclude.
“The transitional economic repercussions that would result if the switch towards a climate-friendly economy is delayed, are comparable to the costs of the financial crisis the world just experienced,” lead-author Gunnar Luderer says. The later climate policy implementation starts, the faster – hence the more expensive – emissions have to be reduced if states world-wide want to achieve the internationally agreed target of limiting global warming to 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels. A binding global agreement to implement the emissions reductions required to reach this target is currently still under negotiation, while global emissions have continued to rise.
“For the first time, our study quantifies the short-term costs of tiptoeing when confronted with the climate challenge,” Luderer says. “Economists tend to look at how things balance out in the long-term, but decision-makers understandably worry about additional burdens for the people and businesses they are responsible for right now. So increased short-term costs due to delaying climate policy might deter decision-makers from starting the transformation. The initial costs of climate policies thus can be more relevant than the total costs.”
Future energy price increases could be limited
The researchers investigated a number of cost dimensions, including climate policy effects on energy prices. If emissions reductions are delayed beyond 2030, global energy price levels are likely to increase by 80 percent in the short term. Such price increases are of particular concern because of the burden they put on the world’s poor. In the past, comparable energy price increases in developing countries have resulted in massive public opposition and social unrest, like in Indonesia in 1998 after a cutback of fuel subsidies. If an agreement on emissions reductions compatible with the 2 degree target is reached until 2015, short-term energy price increases could be limited to 25 percent.
The Latest on: Climate policy
- Fires across Qld, NSW stoke climate debateon September 9, 2019 at 7:07 am
The institute's climate and energy director Richie Merzian said climate change was driving economic policy, diplomacy and politics but the report found Australians were concerned about the impact now ...
- Democratic Candidates Climate Policy Commitments Are Incredibly Ambitious, but Fail a Reality Teston September 9, 2019 at 6:57 am
According to a July 2019 poll, 67% of Democrats and 83% of liberal Democrats said that responding to climate change should be a top priority of the president and congress. The 2020 Democratic ...
- UN sounds alarm over climate change's impact on human rightson September 9, 2019 at 6:48 am
Climate change is not only having a devastating ... Paraguay and Brazil to "ensure the implementation of longstanding environmental policies ... thus preventing future tragedies." ...
- Climate change finally took center stage in 2020 raceon September 9, 2019 at 6:00 am
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill Climate change finally took ... Trump should work on policies that support workers Trump to speak at GOP House ...
- The Energy 202: Here how Democrats plan to pressure Trump on energy and environmental policy this fallon September 9, 2019 at 5:46 am
2. Outlining long-term policy priorities for a potential future Democratic president: Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee hope to introduce by the end of the year a bill that aims to ...
- As climate change threatens Earth, US to open nearly 200 power plantson September 9, 2019 at 3:30 am
To avoid a climate change apocalypse, carbon dioxide emissions need ... an analyst with EQ Research, a clean energy policy consulting firm in Cary, North Carolina. Companies also focus on reliability.
- Opinion: The Democrats' Climate-Change Litmus Teston September 8, 2019 at 1:43 pm
From the policy debates to the political fights, each week get critical perspective and the analysis you need on developments from Washington.
- Column: For Democrats, climate messaging could outweigh policieson September 7, 2019 at 11:30 pm
Climate policy is one of the top issues among Democratic primary voters. But how the candidates connect with voters on the issue may have less to do with policy points and more with how they frame ...
- Democrats Debate Climate Change Policies! Blame 'Them'on September 5, 2019 at 5:01 pm
When asked whether I would watch the 7 hours of televised debate on climate change between Democratic candidates, I replied that it reminded me of the scene from the classic movie “Airplane,” where ...
- Cory Booker Says Every Policy Should Be Informed by Climate Changeon September 4, 2019 at 9:57 pm
Combating climate change is not one item on a list of policies, Senator Cory Booker said: It is “the lens through which we must do everything.” Under a Booker administration, he said, every department ...
via Google News and Bing News