No consistent change occurs in the distinguishing texture of their irises for at least a decade
A new report* by biometric researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) uses data from thousands of frequent travelers enrolled in an iris recognition program to determine that no consistent change occurs in the distinguishing texture of their irises for at least a decade. These findings inform identity program administrators on how often iris images need to be recaptured to maintain accuracy.
For decades, researchers seeking biometric identifiers other than fingerprints believed that irises were a strong biometric because their one-of-a-kind texture meets the stability and uniqueness requirements for biometrics. However, recent research has questioned that belief. A study of 217 subjects over a three-year period found that the recognition of the subjects’ irises became increasingly difficult, consistent with an aging effect.**
To learn more, NIST biometric researchers used several methods to evaluate iris stability.
Researchers first examined anonymous data from millions of transactions from NEXUS, a joint Canadian and American program used by frequent travelers to move quickly across the Canadian border. As part of NEXUS, members’ irises are enrolled into the system with an iris camera and their irises are scanned and matched to system files when they travel across the border. NIST researchers also examined a larger, but less well-controlled set of anonymous statistics collected over a six-year period.
In both large-population studies, NIST researchers found no evidence of a widespread aging effect, said Biometric Testing Project Leader Patrick Grother. A NIST computer model estimates that iris recognition of average people will typically be useable for decades after the initial enrollment.
“In our iris aging study we used a mixed effects regression model, for its ability to capture population-wide aging and individual-specific aging, and to estimate the aging rate over decades,” said Grother. “We hope these methods will be applicable to other biometric aging studies such as face aging because of their ability to represent variation across individuals who appear in a biometric system irregularly.”
NIST researchers then reanalyzed the images from the earlier studies of 217 subjects that evaluated the population-wide aspect. Those studies reported an increase in false rejection rates over time—that is, the original, enrolled images taken in the first year of the study did not match those taken later. While the rejection numbers were high, the results did not necessarily demonstrate that the iris texture itself was changing. In fact, a study by another research team identified pupil dilation as the primary cause behind the false rejection rates.*** This prompted the NIST team to consider the issue.
NIST researchers showed that dilation in the original pool of subjects increased in the second year of the test and decreased the next, but was not able to determine why. When they accounted for the dilation effect, researchers did not observe a change in the texture or aging effect. Some iris cameras normalize dilation by using shielding or by varying the illumination.
The Latest on: Biometric identifiers
- An Indian oil company left the biometric ID numbers of 6.7 million customers accessible on Google on February 19, 2019 at 5:48 am
Aadhaar is the world’s largest biometric database and is used in ... and in particular Aadhaar’s regulator, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), has a record of quickly ... […]
- Russian central bank lays down security rules for protecting consumers biometric data on February 19, 2019 at 4:06 am
In particular, the document sets forth rules that make it possible to mitigate risks when gathering biometric personal data, processing individuals’ requests and personal information, and conducting r... […]
- ACIC ignored DTA's calls on failed $34 milion biometric project on February 18, 2019 at 11:38 pm
The Digital Transformation Agency attempted to call and email the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission to ascertain the status of the biometric identification system project, but had no oversig... […]
- Biometrics Spending in Government market insights shared in detailed report on February 17, 2019 at 9:34 pm
... Countries Type and Application Forecast to 2023 Rapid technological advancements in the field of biometric recognition and identification systems along with advancements in computing and other sup... […]
- Biometrics for Banking and Financial Services market insights shared in detailed report on February 17, 2019 at 9:17 pm
Biometric identifiers are the distinctive, measurable characteristics used to label and describe individuals. Biometrics for Banking and Financial Services helps to increase customer trust and improve ... […]
- Biometric Driver Identification System Market: Global Industry Analysis, size, sales and Forecast by 2022 on February 15, 2019 at 7:24 am
Biometric driver identification system is being used to prevent unauthorized access to vehicles. Automobile industry is increasingly adopting biometric identification system to ensure security of the ... […]
- Commentary: Ruling a warning about biometrics on February 15, 2019 at 1:41 am
The Illinois Supreme Court issued an important decision in late January rejecting attempts to gut the state’s landmark law that bars companies from collecting people’s biometric identifiers — includin... […]
- Healthcare Biometrics Month: Empowering Patient ID on February 14, 2019 at 11:25 am
Biometric identification and authentication technologies offer a wide range of potential uses, and thanks to their reliability and ease of use in verifying identity, they have been notably embraced by ... […]
- MLB’s Use of Biometric Ticketing May Bring Controversy and Legal Issues on February 12, 2019 at 9:15 am
Biometric identification has hit the big leagues. The league is partnering with airport security company Clear and Tickets.com, the MLB’s wholly owned ticketing tech provider, to ditch paper and mobil... […]
- What is biometrics? And why collecting biometric data is risky on February 12, 2019 at 3:03 am
Examples of these biometric identifiers are fingerprints, facial patterns, voice or typing cadence. Each of these identifiers is considered unique to the individual, and they may be used in combinatio... […]
via Google News and Bing News