Jul 242012
 

The Ring of Gyges has the power to obscure the obvious.

As the debate on the morality of the United States’ use of unmanned aerial vehicles (“U.A.V.’s,” also known as drones) has intensified in recent weeks, several news and opinion articles have appeared in the media. Two, in particular, both published this month, reflect the current ethical divide on the issue. A feature article in Esquire by Tom Junod censured the “Lethal Presidency of Barack Obama” for the administration’s policy of targeted killings of suspected militants; another, “The Moral Case for Drones,” a news analysis by The Times’ Scott Shane, gathered opinions from experts that implicitly commended the administration for replacing Dresden-style strategic bombing with highly precise attacks that minimize collateral damage.

Amid this discussion, we suggest that an allegory might be helpful to illustrate some of the many moral perils of drone use that have been overlooked. It shows that our attempts to avoid obvious ethical pitfalls of actions like firebombing may leave us vulnerable to other, more subtle, moral dangers.

While drones have become the weapons of our age, the moral dilemma that drone warfare presents is not new.  In fact, it is very, very old:

Once upon a time, in a quiet corner of the Middle East, there lived a shepherd named Gyges.  Despite the hardships in his life Gyges was relatively satisfied with his meager existence.  Then, one day, he found a ring buried in a nearby cave.

This was no ordinary ring; it rendered its wearer invisible.  With this new power, Gyges became increasingly dissatisfied with his simple life.  Before long, he seduced the queen of the land and began to plot the overthrow of her husband.  One evening, Gyges placed the ring on his finger, sneaked into the royal palace, and murdered the king.

In his “Republic,” Plato recounts this tale, but does not tell us the details of the murder. Still, we can rest assured that, like any violent death, it was not a pleasant affair.  However, the story ends well, at least for Gyges.  He marries the queen and assumes the position of king.

This story, which is as old as Western ethics itself, is meant to elicit a particular moral response from us: disgust.  So why do we find Plato’s story so appalling?

Read more . . .

via New York Times – JOHN KAAG and SARAH KREPS
 

The Latest Streaming News: The Moral Hazard of Drones updated minute-by-minute

Bookmark this page and come back often
 

Latest NEWS

 

Latest VIDEO

 

The Latest from the BLOGOSPHERE

Other Interesting Posts

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: