The End Of Hand Crafted Content

Old media loves nothing quite so much as writing about their own impending death. And we always enjoy adding our own two cents – the AP not knowing what YouTube is, the NYTimes guys reading TechCrunch every day, etc.

Speaking broadly, I like what Reuters, Rupert Murdoch and Eric Schmidt are saying: the industry is in crisis, and the daring innovators will prevail. Personally, I still think the best way forward for the best journalists, if not the brands they currently work for, is to leave those brands and do their own thing.

But as one of the innovators in the last go round, I think there’s a much bigger problem lurking on the horizon than a bunch of blogs and aggregators disrupting old media business models that needed disrupting anyway. The rise of fast food content is upon us, and it’s going to get ugly.

Old media frets over blogs and aggregators that summarize content and link back to the original source. They can’t make a business in that world, they say, so they run the other way and try to find a way to protect and charge for content.

These are the cavemen, or whoever, who were afraid of fire when it was discovered because it burned, or was too technologically advanced to really understand. The smart guys used it to cook their meat and keep them warm, and multiplied.

For our part, we throw a party when someone “steals” our content and links back to us. High fives all around the office. At least there’s some small nod in our direction. And the aggregators like TechMeme can figure out who broke the news. Page views are lost, but reputation is gained.

But for every link there are dozens of sites that outright steal our content with no attribution. Not just spam blogs, even the NYTimes does it. This isn’t a copyright issue – the stories are rewritten by actual people. But it’s far cheaper to simply take the news and rewrite it – if you can get away with it – than to hire people who do actual journalism. Over time, it becomes a competitive tax that is difficult to bear.

But even then, companies like ours can find a way to compete.

So what really scares me? It’s the rise of fast food content that will surely, over time, destroy the mom and pop operations that hand craft their content today. It’s the rise of cheap, disposable content on a mass scale, force fed to us by the portals and search engines.

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• The News Crisis: What Google Can Do (blogs.nybooks.com)
• Murdoch and Curley to Google: pay up! (guardian.co.uk)

Random Posts:

• A Writing Revolution
• A Very Different and Positive Way of Bringing Peace to “Trouble Spots”
• Going Green: Standby savings in the home
• 40 Million Electric Bikes Spark Environmental Dilemma in China
• Harnessing waste heat to produce electricity

Related posts:

1. Google Plans Tools to Help News Media Charge for Content
2. There Are Lots Of Ways To Fund Journalism
3. NPR Recognizes It Makes Business Sense To Give Up Content Cash Cow And Go Free
4. Publisher Lays Out Plan to Save Newspapers
5. Google Unveils News-by-Topic Service

Tags: blog, business model, business models, innovator, innovators, internet, IP, journalism, journalist, journalists, media, search engines, TechCrunch, ted, youtube

This entry was posted on Sunday, December 13th, 2009 at 3:25 pm and is filed under Communications, Consider This, Innovation Needed, TechCrunch, Worth Repeating. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.