LED Bulbs Save Substantial Energy, a Study Finds

Does the latest generation of energy-saving light bulbs save energy? A comprehensive study conducted by Osram, the German lighting company, provides evidence that they do.

While that may seem self-evident, until the release of the report on Monday the answer remained unclear.

That is because no one knew if the production of LED lamps required more energy than needed for standard incandescent bulbs. While it is indisputable that LEDs use a fraction of the electricity of a regular bulb to create the same amount of light, if more energy were used in the manufacturing and distribution process, then the lighting industry could be traveling down a technological dead end.

The study results show that over the entire life of the bulb — from manufacturing to disposal — the energy used for incandescent bulbs is almost five times that used for compact fluorescents and LED lamps.

The energy used during the manufacturing phase of all lamps is insignificant — less than 2 percent of the total. Given that both compact fluorescents and LEDs use about 20 percent of the electricity needed to create the same amount of light as a standard incandescent, both lighting technologies put incandescents to shame.

“We welcome these kinds of studies,” said Kaj den Daas, chief executive of Philips Lighting North America. The Osram study “provides facts where we often have only emotional evidence.” Philips recently became the first entrant in the Energy Department’s L Prize, a race to develop the first practical 60-watt LED equivalent to a standard light bulb.

To calculate what is know as a Life Cycle Assessment of LED lamps, Osram compared nearly every aspect of the manufacturing process, including the energy used in manufacturing the lamps in Asia and Europe, packaging them, and transporting them to Germany where they would be sold. It also looked at the emissions created in each stage, and calculated the effect of six different global warming indexes.

Those included the amount of greenhouse gas emissions created by each process, the acid rain potential, eutrophication (excessive algae), photochemical ozone creation, the release of harmful chemical compounds, and the resultant scarcity of gas, coal, and oil.

Compact fluorescents also contain harmful mercury, which can pollute the soil when discarded.

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• LEDs: Throwing Some Light on the Hype (boingboing.net)
• Gadgetwise: Contender in a Light Bulb Contest (gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com)
• Philips Submits LED Light Bulb Hoping for a $10 Million Prize (takepart.com)
• Build a Better Bulb for a $10 Million Prize (innovationtoronto.com)
• Remote-Controlled LED Light Bulbs Offer 7 Shades of White (lightbulbs.org)

Random Posts:

• Maized and confused
• LED Bulbs Save Substantial Energy, a Study Finds
• A Future That Doesn’t Guzzle
• One Giant Leap to Nowhere
• 3-D Printing Hits Rock-bottom Prices With Homemade Ceramics Mix

Related posts:

1. Build a Better Bulb for a $10 Million Prize
2. LEDs And Smart Lighting Could Save Trillions Of Dollars, Spark Global Innovation
3. Digital Tools Help Users Save Energy, Study Finds
4. A brilliant new approach
5. Green Promise Seen in Switch to LED Lighting

Tags: compact fluorescents, energy saving light bulbs, led lamps, led lighting, led lights, life cycle assessment, lighting technologies, osram, philips lighting

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009 at 1:08 pm and is filed under Buying Time, Innovation, NY Times, Project Energy, environment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.