Inventing a Better Patent System

A great source of information on the new frontier of patents, copyright and the ongoing battles of intellectual property protection is: www.techdirt.com

GARY LOCKE, the secretary of commerce, has urged Congress to overhaul the nation’s patent law by the end of the year. Although a bill has been circulating since 2005, a fierce fight involving the high-tech and drug industries on a technical issue — how to measure damages when a company violates a patent applying to one component of a larger product — has kept it from reaching a vote.

The best way forward is for Congress to sidestep the damages question and instead add five amendments to existing statutes that would improve the processing of patents, reduce lawsuits and speed up the arrival of innovations on the market.

The quality of American patents has been deteriorating for years; they are increasingly issued for products and processes that are not truly innovative — things like the queuing system for Netflix, which was patented in 2003. Yes, it makes renting movies a snap, but was it really a breakthrough deserving patent protection?

One root of the problem is that patent examiners, many of whom are young or lack practical experience, are not qualified to evaluate whether complex claims in biotech or physics meet the most critical tests: whether the claim is novel relative to prior art, and whether this would be obvious to a person skilled in the art. To help fix this, Congress should pass an amendment allowing experts in the field to submit explanatory or critical comments on patent applications.

Currently, most such evaluations are prohibited “without the express written consent of the applicant.” But academic scientists and industry researchers are the best judges of an application’s novelty. Their input would help federal examiners better understand the merits of claims. True, outside comments would likely elicit disagreements from the applicant — but it is better to have this debate first rather than waiting until after patents are granted and taking it to the courts, as we do now.

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• Become Patent-smart Entrepreneur (slideshare.net)
• Apple Tries To Patent Annoying People With Intrusive Advertising That Requires Attention (techdirt.com)
• That Whole Watch An Ad To Get Content Thing? Patented… And The Patent Holder Has Been Suing (techdirt.com)
• BMW Trying To Patent Technological Problem Solving (techdirt.com)
• Podcasting patented! VoloMedia claims major tech patent (arstechnica.com)
• Software Patents? Does Anyone Have A Clue? (lockergnome.com)

Random Posts:

• Hybrid biological machines powered by bacteria
• New Way to Tap Gas May Expand Global Supplies
• Brew your own
• “Wake Up, Gentlemen”
• Fingernail-sized implant successfully eliminates tumors in mammals

Related posts:

1. Bad Ideas: Trying To Build Patent Marketplaces
2. The Key To Innovation: Putting Ideas And Information Together In New Ways
3. Yet Another Nobel Prize Winner Says That Intellectual Property Is Harming Science
4. An end to frivolous patents may finally be in sight
5. Who Owns Green Tech?

Tags: american patents, gary locke, innovative things, intellectual property protection, netflix, patent applications, patent examiners, patent law, patent protection, Techdirt

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 at 11:15 am and is filed under Consider This, Innovation Needed, NY Times, Need to Know, Shape of Things to Come?. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.