Climate change cover-up? You better believe it

Was Sen. James Inhofe right when he declared 2009 the year of the climate contrarian? A slew of emails stolen from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit highlight definite character flaws among some climate scientists—including an embarrassing attempt to delete emails that discussed the most recent report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—while also exposing what looks like a failure of scientists to acknowledge a halt to global warming in the past decade.

Sadly for the potential fate of human civilization, rumors of the demise of climate change have been much exaggerated. The past decade recorded nine of the warmest years in recent history as well as the rapid dwindling of Arctic sea ice, surely the result of imminent global cooling if climate change contrarians are to be believed. After all, one of the most “damaging” emails in question from Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., is actually mourning the paucity of Earth observation systems and data in the past decade, such as satellites (gutted by a lack of funding and launch miscues in recent years) to monitor climate change in the midst of natural variability.

The “Copenhagen Diagnosis” released today reveals that by any objective measure—melting ice sheets, greenhouse gas concentrations, sea level rise—the climate is warming faster than anticipated. And when the natural variability induced by massive climate systems such as oscillations over decades in ocean temperatures, currents and even sunspots reverts to the mean, the roughly three warming watts per square meter added by greenhouse gases will still be there to drive climate change.

You can judge the emails for yourself at this wonderful searchable database. While the revelations about pressuring the peer review process and apparent slowness in responding to an avalanche of requests for information unveil something below impressive scientific and personal behavior, they can also be seen as the frustrated responses of people working on complex data under deadline while being harassed by political opponents.

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• Key Scientist Says Politics Behind Stolen E-Mails (abcnews.go.com)
• University of East Anglia emails: the most contentious quotes (telegraph.co.uk)
• Climate change scientist at centre of leaked email row ‘absolutely’ stands by his findings (telegraph.co.uk)
• Pretending the climate email leak isn’t a crisis won’t make it go away | George Monbiot (guardian.co.uk)
• Hacked e-mails fuel climate debate (cnn.com)
• Professor rubbishes leaked email row (guardian.co.uk)

Random Posts:

• Is It Possible To Teach Experience?
• Electric car pumps energy back into grid
• Local TV for Devices on the Move
• AlterG M300 Anti-Gravity Treadmill: train or rehabilitate weightlessly
• Welcome ToJam3!

Related posts:

1. Combating climate change by observing the Earth
2. Climate Change May Mean Slower Winds
3. How Can Humanity Avoid or Reverse the Dangers Posed by a Warming Climate?
4. Trusting Nature as the Climate Referee
5. Climate Change Odds Much Worse Than Thought

Tags: climate change, climate change controversy, climate change cover-up, climate scientist, copenhagen, greenhouse gas concentrations, intergovernmental panel on climate change, national center for atmospheric research, university of east anglia

This entry was posted on Saturday, November 28th, 2009 at 9:58 am and is filed under Need to Know, Scientific American, Worth Repeating, climate change, environment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.