Evidence for human interference with Earth’s climate continues to accumulate

On November 18, with the United Nations Global Warming Conference in Copenhagen fast approaching, U.S. Senator James R. Inhofe (R-Okla.) took the floor of the Senate and proclaimed 2009 to be “The Year of the Skeptic.” Had the senator’s speech marked a new commitment to dispassionate, rational inquiry, a respect for scientific thought and a well-grounded doubt in ghosts, astrology, creationism and homeopathy, it might have been cause for cheer. But Inhofe had a more narrow definition of skeptic in mind: he meant “standing up and exposing the science, the costs and the hysteria behind global warming alarmism.”

Within the community of scientists and others concerned about anthropogenic climate change, those whom Inhofe calls skeptics are more commonly termed contrarians, naysayers and denialists. Not everyone who questions climate change science fits that description, of course—some people are genuinely unaware of the facts or honestly disagree about their interpretation. What distinguishes the true naysayers is an unwavering dedication to denying the need for action on the problem, often with weak and long-disproved arguments about supposed weaknesses in the science behind global warming.

What follows is only a partial list of the contrarians’ bad arguments and some brief rebuttals of them.

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• Climate Change Is Inevitable – It’s Time to Adapt (wired.com)
• Steep Decline In Americans’ Belief In Global Warming (huffingtonpost.com)
• Dalai Lama urges world to act on climate change (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Deep freeze ‘arks’ to save coral reefs (guardian.co.uk)

Related posts:

1. How Can Humanity Avoid or Reverse the Dangers Posed by a Warming Climate?
2. Climate Change May Mean Slower Winds
3. Climate change cover-up? You better believe it
4. Trusting Nature as the Climate Referee
5. Global climate deal only 50:50 chance: Flannery

Tags: climate ccontrarian, climate change nonsense, climate change science, Dalai Lama, global warming conference, human interference, inhofe, skeptic

This entry was posted on Monday, November 30th, 2009 at 8:20 pm and is filed under Consider This, Innovation Needed, Project Energy, Scientific American, Shape of Things to Come?, climate change, environment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.