In Search Of Wildlife-friendly Biofuels: Are Native Prairie Plants the Answer?

When society jumps on a bandwagon, even for a good cause, there may be unintended consequences. The unintended consequence of crop-based biofuels may be the loss of wildlife habitat, particularly that of the birds who call this country’s grasslands home, say researchers from Michigan Technological University and The Nature Conservancy.

In a paper published in the October 2009 issue of the journal BioScience, David Flaspohler, Joseph Fargione and colleagues analyze the impacts on wildlife of the burgeoning conversion of grasslands to corn. They conclude that the ongoing conversion of grasslands to corn for ethanol production is posing a very real threat to the wildlife whose habitat is being transformed. One potential solution: Use diverse native prairie plants to produce bioenergy instead of a single agricultural crop like corn.

“There are ways to grow biofuel that are more benign,” said Flaspohler, an associate professor in the School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science at Michigan Tech. “Our advice would be to think broadly and holistically about the approach you use to solve a problem and to carefully consider its potential long-term impacts.”

The rapidly growing demand for corn ethanol, fueled by a government mandate to produce 136 billion liters of biofuel by 2022—more than 740 percent more than was produced in 2006—and federal subsidies to farmers to grow corn, is causing a land-use change on a scale not seen since virgin prairies were plowed and enormous swaths of the country’s forests were first cut down to grow food crops, the researchers say.

“Bioenergy is the most land-intensive way to produce energy, so we need to consider the land use implications of our energy policies,” said Fargione, lead scientist for The Nature Conservancy’s North America Region.

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• Strategy outlined for growing bioenergy while protecting wildlife (scienceblog.com)
• In Search of Wildlife-Friendly Biofuels (usnews.com)
• Food-for-fuel controversy angers ethanol producer (thestar.com)
• Grassoline: Biofuels Beyond Corn (scientificamerican.com)
• Use the Toilet, Produce Biofuels! High-Yield Cellulosic Ethanol From Sewage System Debuted (treehugger.com)
• A Better Bug for Biofuels (technologyreview.com)

Random Posts:

• Broken hearts mend with ‘patch’
• Industrial Farming is Giving us Less Nutritious Food
• Spotlight on Science Diplomacy
• Google Working On Micropayment Scheme To Help Newspapers Commit Suicide Faster
• Smart Electricity Meter Developed

Related posts:

1. Is Algae Worse than Corn for Biofuels?
2. Wind, Water And Sun Beat Biofuels, Nuclear And Coal For Clean Energy
3. Some Biofuels Are Worse Environmentally Than Fossil Fuels, Analysis Shows
4. Why Ethanol–Not Electric Cars and Hybrids–Is the Answer
5. U.S. Navy Green: Military Investigates Biofuels to Power Its Ships and Planes

Tags: biofuel, biofuels, corn ethanol, david flaspohler, energy policies, ethanol production, food crops, forest resources, grasslands, native prairie plants, nature conservancy, potential solution, unintended consequence, unintended consequences, virgin prairies

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 11th, 2009 at 3:48 pm and is filed under Consider This, Innovation Needed, Project Energy, Resources, Science Digest / Science Daily, disruptive innovation, environment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.